GENOTYPIC VARIABILITY AND TRAIT ASSOCIATION IN COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.) SEEDLINGS UNDER NORMAL AND DROUGHT CONDITIONS

Authors

  • MF KHAN Cotton Research Station, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • SAS SHAH Cotton Research Station, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • T MANZOOR Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.266

Keywords:

Genetic variability, correlation, seedling traits, drought, greenhouse

Abstract

The genetic variability and correlation parameter studies for seedling traits viz; fresh root length, fresh shoot length, fresh shoot weight, dry shoot weight, tissue moisture percentage and root/shoot ratio in 40 accessions of cotton germplasm, including both local and exotic available at different research stations and institutes of Pakistan were carried out under greenhouse in the department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, during the year 2006. Sufficient genetic variability was observed for seedling characters like root length, shoot length, shoot fresh weight, shoot dry weight, tissue moisture percentage and root/shoot ratio under normal and water stress conditions. Based on rooting character and root/shoot ratio, three drought-tolerant cotton genotypes 149-F, BH-124 and DPL-26 and three drought susceptible VH-28, FH-945 and CIM-446 were selected. Correlation coefficients under normal conditions were greater than under drought stress, and the direction of correlations of seedling traits in most cases remained the same. Under normal (r = 0.72) and drought (r = 0.48) conditions, shoot length and root length, were positively correlated, indicating a corresponding increase in shoot length with an increase in root length and vice versa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, H. G., Mahmood, A., & Ali, Q. (2016). Zero tillage: a potential technology to improve cotton yield. Genetika, 48(2), 761-776.

Abbas, H. G., Mahmood, A., & Ali, Q. (2015). Genetic variability and correlation analysis for various yield traits of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Journal of Agricultural Research, 53(4), 481-491.

Ali, F., Ahsan, M., Ali, Q., & Kanwal, N. (2017). Phenotypic stability of Zea mays grain yield and its attributing traits under drought stress. Frontiers in plant science, 8, 1397.

Ali, Q., Ali, A., Awan, M. F., Tariq, M., Ali, S., Samiullah, T. R., ... & Hussain, T. (2014). Combining ability analysis for various physiological, grain yield and quality traits of Zea mays L. Life Sci J, 11(8s), 540-551.

Aaliya, K., Qamar, Z., Ahmad, N. I., Ali, Q., Munim, F. A., & Husnain, T. (2016). Transformation, evaluation of gtgene and multivariate genetic analysis for morpho-physiological and yield attributing traits in Zea mays. Genetika, 48(1), 423-433.

Al-Hamdani, S.H. and T.W. Barger, (2003). Influence of water stress on selected physiological responses of three sorghum genotypes. Italy Journal of Agronomy, 7:15-22

Anonymous. (2012-13). Pakistan Economic Survey. Economic Advisor’s Wing, Finance Div. Gov. of Pak. Islamabad.

Ball, R.A., D.M. Oosterhuis, and A.Mauromoustakos. (1994). Growth dynamics of the cotton plant during water-deficit stress. Agronomy Journal, 86: 788-795.

Basal, H., C.W. Smith, P.S. Thaxton, and J.K. Hemphill. (2005). Seedling drought tolerance in upland cotton. Crop Science. 45(2):766-771.

Batool, F., Hassan, S., Azam, S., Sher, Z., Ali, Q., & Rashid, B. (2023). Transformation and expressional studies of GaZnF gene to improve drought tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 5064.

Cook, C.G. (1985). Identifying Root Traits Among MAR and Non-MAR Cotton, Gossypium Hirsutum L. Cultivars that Relate to Performance Under Limited Moisture Conditions. Master’s thesis, Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas.

Hafeez, M. N., Khan, M. A., Sarwar, B., Hassan, S., Ali, Q., Husnain, T., & Rashid, B. (2021). Mutant Gossypium universal stress protein-2 (GUSP-2) gene confers resistance to various abiotic stresses in E. coli BL-21 and CIM-496-Gossypium hirsutum. Scientific reports, 11(1), 20466.

Genty, B., J.M. Briantais and J.B. Vieira da Silva. (1987). Effects of drought on primary photosynthetic processes of cotton leaves. Plant Physiology, 83: 360-364.

Iqbal, A., Ali, M. A., Ahmed, S., Hassan, S., Shahid, N., Azam, S., ... & Shahid, A. A. (2022). Engineered resistance and risk assessment associated with insecticidal and weeds resistant transgenic cotton using wister rat model. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1-8.

IPCC 2001. Climate change 2001: Synthesis report, In R.T. Watson (ed.). A contribution of working groups I,II, and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, UK.

Loffory, O., Hubac, C. and Vieira da Silva, J.B. (1983). Effect of temperature on drought resistance and growth of cotton plants. Physiologia Plantarum, 59: 297-301.

Malik, R.S., J.S. Dhankar, and N.C. Turner. (1979). Influence of soil water deficits on root growth and cotton seedlings. Plant and Soil, 53: 109-115.

McMichael, B.L. and J.E., Quisenberry. (1991). Genetic variation for root - shoot relationship among cotton germplasm. Environmenatl and Expimental Botany. 31: 461-470.

Natarajan S (1992). Genetic variability and association of leaf area, root length and root dry weight: shoot dry weight ratio in tomato under moisture stress. Madras Agriculture Journal, 79: 271-276.

Nepo-muceno, A.I., D.M. Oosterhuis, and J.M. Stewart. (1998). Physiological response of cotton leaves and roots to water deficit induced by polyethylene glycol. Environmenatl and Expimental Botany, 40 (1): 29-41.

Pace, P.F., H.T. Cralle, S.H.M El-Halawani and S.A. Senseman. (1999). Drought induced changes in root and shoot growth of young cotton plants. Journal of Cotton Science, 3: 183-187.

Pettigrew, W.T. (2004). Physiological consequences of moisture deficit stress in cotton. Crop Science. 44: 1265-1272.

Puspito, A. N., Rao, A. Q., Hafeez, M. N., Iqbal, M. S., Bajwa, K. S., Ali, Q., ... & Husnain, T. (2015). Transformation and evaluation of Cry1Ac+ Cry2A and GTGene in Gossypium hirsutum L. Frontiers in plant science, 6, 943.

Quisenberry J.E., W.R.Jordan, B.A. Roark and D.W. Fryrear. (1981). Exotic cottons as genetic sources for drought resistance. Crop Science. 21: 889-895.

Rehman, I., Aftab, B., Bilal, S. M., Rashid, B., Ali, Q., Umair, M. M., ... & Husnain, T. (2017). Gene expression in response to Cotton Leaf Curl Virus Infection In Gossypium hirsutum under variable environmental conditions. Genetika, 49(3), 1115-1126.

Saranga Y., M. Menz, C.X. Jiang, R. Wright, D. Yakir and A.H. Paterson. (2001). Genomic dissection of genotype x environment interactions conferring adaptation of cotton to arid conditions. Genome Research. 11: 1988-1995.

Sharp R.E. and W.J. Davis. 1985. Root growth and water uptake by maize plants indrying soil. Journal of Expimental Botany. 36: 1441-1456.

Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie and D.A. dickey. 1997. Principal and Procedures of Statistics: A biometrical approach. 3rd ed. WCB/ Mc Graw Hill. Inc. New York, USA.

Zafar, M. M., Mustafa, G., Shoukat, F., Idrees, A., Ali, A., Sharif, F., ... & Li, F. (2022). Heterologous expression of cry3Bb1 and cry3 genes for enhanced resistance against insect pests in cotton. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 10878.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-24

How to Cite

KHAN, M., SHAH, S., & MANZOOR, T. (2023). GENOTYPIC VARIABILITY AND TRAIT ASSOCIATION IN COTTON (GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM L.) SEEDLINGS UNDER NORMAL AND DROUGHT CONDITIONS. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2023(1), 266. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.266

Most read articles by the same author(s)