ASSESSMENT OF ALL TYPES OF LABORATORY ERRORS IN THE TERTIARY CARE CARDIAC FACILITY LABORATORY

N SAEED; SS AHMAD; S MOON; MA KHAN; A BASIT; MM KHAN; SU KHAN; W KHAN; N ALI

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.539

Authors

N SAEED Department of Microbiology, Comsats University Islamabad, Pakistan
SS AHMAD Department of Microbiology, Hazara University Mansehra. Mansehra, Pakistan
S MOON Indus Hospital and Health Network, Karachi, Pakistan
MA KHAN Department of Microbiology, Hazara University Mansehra. Mansehra, Pakistan
A BASIT Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Riphah International University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
MM KHAN Institute of Pathology and Diagnostic Medicine, Khyber Medical University Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
SU KHAN Department of Intensive Care Unit Shaheena Jamil Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan
W KHAN Médecins Sans Frontières Operational Centre Chaman, Balochistan, Pakistan
N ALI Institute Of Pathology And Diagnostic Medicine, Khyber Medical University Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.539

Keywords:

Patient Safety, Laboratory Errors, Total Testing Process (TTP), Pre-analytical Phase, Post-analytical Phase, Error Prevention, Tertiary Care Cardiac Facility

Abstract

A prospective examination of laboratory errors was performed during three months from July to September 2019 at the Rawalpindi Institute of Cardiology (RIC), a 272-bed tertiary care hospital serving the Punjab region and parts of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK). The study aimed to thoroughly evaluate error incidence rates across the complete testing cycle, considering the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases. During this time, nurses, physicians, and medical assistants from various hospital wards submitted samples and request forms to the clinical pathology laboratory at RIC. For a total of 17,917 patients, 73,540 tests were carried out. The overall observed laboratory error rate for the entire testing procedure (TTP) was 1.43%. Notably, pre-analytical mistakes made up the most significant percentage (0.82%), followed by post-analytical errors (0.51%) and analytical errors (0.10%). The data were carefully examined, and the results were presented using figures, charts, and tables to show the prevalence and magnitude of various mistake types. According to the distribution pattern, overall error rates had significantly decreased over the previous ten years. Despite this development, the largest error prevalence was still seen in the pre- and post-analytical processes. Interestingly, errors were frequently found during the pre- and post-analytical procedures outside the lab. To reduce the likelihood of mistakes, RIC undertook several initiatives, and the study highlighted these efforts, highlighting the significance of the laboratory testing procedure for mistake prevention throughout all testing phases.In addition to offering insightful information about the frequency of errors at RIC, this three-month descriptive analysis highlighted ongoing efforts to improve patient safety and lower laboratory errors. The observed gains over the past ten years are evidence of the success of adopted tactics. The results show how important it is to maintain constant watchfulness and employ methodical procedures to guarantee the accuracy and dependability of laboratory testing procedures, improving patient care and safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alaagib, N. A., Abugroun, A. A., Nour, B. Y. M., Dafalla, A. M., Ahmed, E. A. J. J. o. H. R., and Studies, S. (2023). Possible Impact Factors for Poor Quality Management of Clinical Laboratory Performance in Wad Medani City, Sudan. 11, 147-155.

Astion, M. L., Shojania, K. G., Hamill, T. R., Kim, S., and Ng, V. L. J. A. j. o. c. p. (2003). Classifying laboratory incident reports to identify problems that jeopardize patient safety. 120, 18-26.

Carraro, P., and Plebani, M. J. C. C. (2007). Errors in a stat laboratory: changes in type and frequency since 1996. 53, 1-5.

Carraro, P., Servidio, G., and Plebani, M. J. C. c. (2000). Hemolyzed specimens: a reason for rejection or a clinical challenge? 46, 306-307.

Giri, P. A., Baviskar, M. P., Phalke, D. B. J. A. o. m., and research, h. s. (2013). Study of sleep habits and sleep problems among medical students of Pravara Institute of Medical Sciences Loni, Western Maharashtra, India. 3, 51-54.

Glavinović, M. J. N. (1986). Variability of quantal events in control solution and after cholinesterase blockade in frog. 17, 519-526.

Goswami, B., Singh, B., Chawla, R., Mallika, V. J. C. c., and medicine, l. (2010). Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory: a one-year experience. 48, 63-66.

Hawkins, R. J. A. o. l. m. (2012). Managing the pre-and post-analytical phases of the total testing process. 32, 5-16.

Holman, J. W., Mifflin, T. E., Felder, R. A., and Demers, L. M. J. C. c. (2002). Evaluation of an automated pre-analytical robotic workstation at two academic health centers. 48, 540-548.

Howanitz, P. J. J. A. o. P., and Medicine, L. (2005). Errors in laboratory medicine: practical lessons to improve patient safety. 129, 1252-1261.

Jenny, R. W., and Jackson-Tarentino, K. Y. J. C. c. (2000). Causes of unsatisfactory performance in proficiency testing. 46, 89-99.

Khoury, M., Burnett, L., and Mackay, M. A. J. M. J. o. A. (1996). Error rates in Australian chemical pathology laboratories. 165, 128-130.

Lippi, G., Blanckaert, N., Bonini, P., Green, S., Kitchen, S., Palicka, V., Vassault, A. J., Mattiuzzi, C., Plebani, M. J. C. c., and medicine, l. (2009). Causes, consequences, detection, and prevention of identification errors in laboratory diagnostics. 47, 143-153.

McNulty, C. A., Thomas, M., Bowen, J., Buckley, C., Charlett, A., Gelb, D., Foy, C., Sloss, J., and Smellie, S. J. F. p. (2008). Improving the appropriateness of laboratory submissions for urinalysis from general practice. 25, 272-278.

Plebani, M., and Carraro, P. J. C. c. (1997). Mistakes in a stat laboratory: types and frequency. 43, 1348-1351.

Plebani, M. J. C. C., and Medicine, L. (2006). Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? 44, 750-759.

Ross, J., and Boone, D. J. M. L., Wagner W, Essien JDK, eds (1989). Assessing the effect of mistakes in the total testing process on the quality of patient care [Abstract 102].

Sharaki, O., Abouzeid, A., Hossam, N., and Elsherif, Y. J. S. J. f. H. S. (2014). Self assessment of pre, intra and post analytical errors of urine analysis in Clinical Chemistry Laboratory of Alexandria Main University Hospital. 3, 96-102.