MRI Evaluation of Stroke: Differentiating Haemorrhagic and Ischemic Pathologies

Authors

  • Rubab Rasheed Lecturer, Bashir Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Muqadas Mazhar Lecturer, Bashir Institute of Health Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Mudassir Ali Lecturer Radiology, City University of Science and Information Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Faiza Iqbal Lecturer, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, UVAS Swat, Pakistan.
  • Rimsha Niaz Imaging Technologist, IDC Attock Branch, Pakistan.
  • Maria Imtiaz Rehman Medical Institute, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  • Ayesha Khan Radiology Lecturer, Sarhad Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Sarhad University, Peshawar, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v7i3.2255

Keywords:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Stroke; Ischemic Stroke; Cerebral Hemorrhage; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Susceptibility Weighted Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Perfusion Imaging

Abstract

Stroke remains one of the leading causes of death and long-term neurological disability worldwide. Differentiating ischemic stroke from haemorrhagic stroke is the first and most urgent imaging priority because management pathways differ substantially. Ischemic stroke may require intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy, antiplatelet therapy, or anticoagulation in selected cases, whereas haemorrhagic stroke requires urgent blood pressure control, reversal of anticoagulation when indicated, neurosurgical assessment, and prevention of hematoma expansion. Although computed tomography is widely used in emergency stroke pathways because of its rapid availability, magnetic resonance imaging provides superior tissue characterization and can identify early ischemia, blood products, vascular occlusion, perfusion abnormality, haemorrhagic transformation, and stroke mimics. Objective: This review summarizes the role of MRI in differentiating haemorrhagic and ischemic stroke, with emphasis on MRI sequences, temporal lesion evolution, diagnostic pitfalls, advanced imaging techniques, structured reporting, and clinical decision-making. Methods: Recent peer-reviewed literature, including original studies, meta-analyses, imaging-based stroke studies, and contemporary guidelines published within the last five years, was reviewed. Key MRI sequences discussed include diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient mapping, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, gradient echo imaging, susceptibility-weighted imaging, perfusion MRI, arterial spin labeling, magnetic resonance angiography, and vessel wall imaging. Results: Diffusion-weighted imaging with ADC mapping remains the most sensitive MRI method for detecting acute ischemic injury, whereas GRE and SWI are central to identifying intracranial haemorrhage, microbleeds, superficial siderosis, thrombus susceptibility, and haemorrhagic transformation. FLAIR supports lesion-age assessment and DWI-FLAIR mismatch evaluation in unknown-onset stroke. Perfusion MRI and arterial spin labeling provide information about tissue-at-risk, delayed transit, collateral physiology, and post-recanalization haemodynamic changes. MRA detects large-vessel occlusion, stenosis, dissection, and vascular malformation, while vessel wall MRI improves etiological classification in selected patients. Conclusion: MRI is a highly valuable modality for differentiating ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke when performed using a rapid, structured, and treatment-oriented protocol. The most useful acute MRI protocol includes DWI/ADC, FLAIR, GRE or SWI, and MRA, with perfusion imaging, ASL, and vessel wall imaging added according to clinical need.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
215

References

1. GBD 2021 Stroke Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Neurol. 2024;23(10):973-1003.

2. Li XY, Kong XM, Yang CH, Cheng ZF, Lv JJ, Guo H, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of ischemic stroke, 1990–2021: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;75:102758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102758

3. Wang S, Zou XL, Wu LX, Zhou HF, Xiao L, Yao T, et al. Epidemiology of intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2022;13:915813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.915813

4. Frias P, Khangura RS, Varjavand B, Alexander MD. Imaging in acute ischaemic stroke: assessing findings in light of evolving therapies. Br J Radiol. 2024;97(1158):1078-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae050

5. Colasurdo M, Chen H, Gandhi D. MR imaging techniques for acute ischemic stroke and delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2024;34(2):203-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2023.12.002

6. Nagaraja N. Diffusion weighted imaging in acute ischemic stroke: a review of its interpretation pitfalls and advanced diffusion imaging application. J Neurol Sci. 2021;425:117435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2021.117435

7. Greenberg SM, Ziai WC, Cordonnier C, Dowlatshahi D, Francis B, Goldstein JN, et al. 2022 guideline for the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2022;53(7):e282-e361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000407

8. Weerink LBM, Appelman APA, Kloet RW, van der Hoorn A. Susceptibility-weighted imaging in intracranial hemorrhage: not all bleeds are black. Br J Radiol. 2023;96(1148):20220304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220304

9. Kawano H, Hirano T. Minimal imaging requirements. J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2023;17(11):243-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0045

10. Kits A, De Luca F, Kolloch J, Müller S, Mazya MV, Skare S, et al. One-minute multi-contrast echo planar brain MRI in ischemic stroke: a retrospective observational study of diagnostic performance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2021;54(4):1088-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27641

11. Kits A, Al-Saadi J, De Luca F, Janzon F, Mazya MV, Lundberg J, et al. 2.5-minute fast brain MRI with multiple contrasts in acute ischemic stroke. Neuroradiology. 2024;66(5):737-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03331-0

12. Altmann S, Grauhan NF, Brockstedt L, Kondova M, Schmidtmann I, Paul R, et al. Ultrafast brain MRI with deep learning reconstruction for suspected acute ischemic stroke. Radiology. 2024;310(2):e231938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.231938

13. Alkhiri A, Alturki F, Alansari NM, Almaghrabi AA, Alghamdi BA, Alamri AF, et al. Prognosis and distribution of ischemic stroke with negative diffusion-weighted imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1376439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1376439

14. Berge E, Whiteley W, Audebert H, De Marchis GM, Fonseca AC, Padiglioni C, et al. European Stroke Organisation guidelines on intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Eur Stroke J. 2021;6(1):I-LXII. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987321989865

15. Kaewumporn U, Songsaeng D, Kunapinun A, Chaisinanunkul N. FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch and DWI-FLAIR mismatch ASPECTS for prediction of good outcome after recanalization in anterior circulation stroke: multicenter observational study. Eur J Radiol. 2023;163:110837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110837

16. Akay EMZ, Rieger J, Schöttler R, Behland J, Schymczyk R, Khalil AA, et al. A deep learning analysis of stroke onset time prediction and comparison to DWI-FLAIR mismatch. Neuroimage Clin. 2023;40:103544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103544

17. Xiang W, Liang Z, Zhang M, Wei H, Sun Z, Lv Y, et al. Prognostic value of susceptibility-weighted imaging of prominent veins in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1052035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1052035

18. Li J, Zhan Z, Zhang Z, Wang W, Xu K, Sun W. Susceptibility vessel sign in patients with subacute ischemic stroke. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024;14(6):3914-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-1797

19. Wiegertjes K, Voigt S, Jolink WMT, Koemans EA, Schreuder FHBM, van Walderveen MAA, et al. Diffusion-weighted lesions after intracerebral hemorrhage: associated MRI findings. Front Neurol. 2022;13:882070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.882070

20. Suzuki K, Katano T, Numao S, Nishi Y, Kutsuna A, Kanamaru T, et al. Clinical significance of intracranial hemorrhage after thrombectomy detected solely by magnetic resonance imaging and not by computed tomography. J Neurol Sci. 2024;460:122999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2024.122999

21. Wu L, Liu Y, Zhu L, Li T, Wang L, Zhang Y, et al. MRI arterial spin labeling in evaluating hemorrhagic transformation following endovascular recanalization of subacute ischemic stroke. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1105816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1105816

22. Jaafar N, Alsop DC. Arterial spin labeling: key concepts and progress towards use as a clinical tool. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2024;23(3):352-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2024-0013

23. Togao O, Obara M, Yamashita K, Kikuchi K, Wada T, Murazaki H, et al. Arterial spin labeling-based MR angiography for cerebrovascular diseases: principles and clinical applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024;60(4):1305-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29119

24. He WW, Lu SS, Ge S, Gu P, Shen ZZ, Wu FY, et al. Impact on etiology diagnosis by high-resolution vessel wall imaging in young adults with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Neuroradiology. 2023;65(6):1015-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-023-03131-y

25. Kang DW, Kim DY, Kim J, Baik SH, Jung C, Singh N, et al. Emerging concept of intracranial arterial diseases: the role of high resolution vessel wall MRI. J Stroke. 2024;26(1):26-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2023.02481

26. Yuan W, Liu X, Yan Z, Wu B, Lu B, Chen B, et al. Association between high-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging characteristics and recurrent stroke in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic steno-occlusive disease: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Stroke. 2024;19(5):569-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241228203

27. Xie S, Ran Y, Wang X, Zhang Y, Fu Q, Ren Y, et al. Diagnostic potential of routine brain MRI and high-resolution, multi-contrast vessel wall imaging in the detection of internal carotid artery dissection. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1165453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1165453

28. Bojsen JA, Elhakim MT, Graumann O, Gaist D, Nielsen M, Harbo FSG, et al. Artificial intelligence for MRI stroke detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Insights Imaging. 2024;15(1):160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-024-01723-7

29. Wu J, Peng Z, Zhang H. Impact of stroke imaging selection modality on endovascular thrombectomy outcomes in the early and extended time windows: a meta-analysis. Brain Behav. 2024;14(8):e3530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3530

30. Bankole NDA, Mujanovic A, Dokponou YCH, Provost C, Pasi M, Redjem H, et al. MRI versus CT before endovascular thrombectomy in the early time window: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neuroradiol. 2025;52(6):101384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurad.2025.101384

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

1.
Rasheed R, Mazhar M, Ali M, Iqbal F, Niaz R, Imtiaz M, et al. MRI Evaluation of Stroke: Differentiating Haemorrhagic and Ischemic Pathologies. Biol Clin Sci Res J [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 31 [cited 2026 Jun. 25];7(3):39-45. Available from: https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/2255

Issue

Section

Review Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.