Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj <p>Articles for Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal (Biol. Clin. Sci. Res. J. eISSN: 2708-2261; pISSN: 2958-4728) must be original reports of research not simultaneously submitted to or previously published in any other scientific or technical journal and must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing scientific concepts. The study reported should be applicable to a sizable geographic area or an area of ecological or economic significance and of potential interest to a significant number of scientists. Each calendar year will have one volume. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved by the authors rather than waiting for a collection of articles for a specific issue. Also, each article is published in its respective category. BCSRJ consider the following categories of articles; Original research Article, Short Research Article, Short communications, Review Article, Minireview Article, Systematic Reviews, Policy Papers, Commentaries / Opinion Article, Data Notes, Study Protocols, and pre-protocols, Method Article, Data Article, Case reports / Case studies, Clinical Practice Article, Grey literature government reports, Abstracts of scientific meetings, Letter to the Editor, Scholarly Book Review, Technical Note, Perspective, Correspondence, and News and Views. As a result, the page numbers in the ‘Table of Contents’ displayed for each issue will reflect this rather than numerical order. The journal was started aims to provide a platform of publications under the banner of <em><a href="http://medeyepublishers.com"><strong>MEDEYE Publishers</strong></a> </em>following eminent standards to the researchers, scholars, scientists, and professionals of Biological and Medical Sciences. The inclusion of multiple academic disciplines helps in pooling the knowledge from two or more fields of study to handle better-suited problems by finding solutions established on new understandings. The authors can submit manuscripts online through OJS System. Authors can submit their manuscripts to the editorial office along with any query through email at,</p> <p><strong>bcsrj.clinical@gmail.com</strong></p> <p>Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal publishes articles reporting original research articles are grouped by subject matter into all type of biological and medical research but not confined with the following categories: Botany, Plant Sciences, Plant Molecular Biology, Plant Biotechnology, Plant Genetics, Plant Computational Biology, Plant Cell Biology, Plant Biochemistry, Plant Ecology, Agricultural Scienes, Agricultural Economics, Marine Sciences, Plant-Microbe interaction, Plant environmental interactions, Medical Sciences, Clinical Sciences, Animal Sciences, Human Genetics, Animal Biotechnology.</p> en-US editor@bcsrj.com (BCSRJ) bcsrj.clinical@gmail.com (Ali Hussain) Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000 OJS 3.2.1.3 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Single versus Multiple Mini-tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Renal Stone: A Single-Center Study https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/1988 <p><em>Staghorn stones are difficult to treat, which may cause severe complications in the urinary tract. So surgical intervention is necessary. <strong>Objective:</strong> This study aimed to determine the outcomes of Single versus multiple mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Renal Stones. <strong>Methods:</strong> The present randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Urology, Postgraduate Medical Institute (PGMI), Quetta, from January 2025 to June 2025, following permission from the hospital's ethical committee. Individuals of both genders and different age groups with complete or partial staghorn stones and scattered renal stones involving both renal pelvis and calyces were included. The study participants were divided into two groups: Group A and Group B. Each group has 55 individuals. Group A received a single mini-tract (21-Fr sheath) via the percutaneous method, and Group B required multiple mini-tracts (two). To determine the location, dimensions, and hardness of the stones, as well as the anatomy of the renal collecting system, for continuous variables (such as patient characteristics and perioperative data), an independent-sample t-test was employed. The perioperative findings and postoperative outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS. <strong>Results:</strong> A total of 110 individuals with satghorn stones were enrolled in this study, which were randomly divided into single (A) and multiple (B) tract PCNL groups. In a single tract, the mean stone size was 11.68 ± 8.07, whereas in multiple tracts, it was 16.24 ± 10.50. Consequently, there was a notable variation in stone size between the two groups (P = 0.005). When comparing the two groups' operative times, the mean time for a single tract was 101±11.0 minutes, while the mean time for multiple tracts was 121±23.6 minutes (p-value of 0.005). A single-tract hospital stay lasted 4.20±2.21 days, while a multiple-tract hospital stay lasted 4.21±2.10 days. Likewise, 28% of blood transfusions occurred in a single tract, while 16% occurred in multiple tracts. Clavien-Dindo was assigned to the complication of blood transfusion and bleeding, which were the most serious adverse effects associated with the multiple-tract strategy compared to single-tract therapies.</em> <strong><em>Conclusion:</em></strong><em> The present study concluded that a safe and effective technique for treating staghorn kidney stones is multiple-tract access during PCNL.</em></p> Jamil Ahmed Khan Copyright (c) 2025 Jamil Ahmed Khan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/1988 Tue, 30 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0000 Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus in the Elderly: A Narrative Review of Diagnostic Complexity, Biomarker Potential, and Surgical Outcomes https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/1977 <p><em>Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a reversible cause of dementia in older adults, characterized by the clinical triad of gait disturbance, cognitive decline, and urinary incontinence. Owing to overlapping symptoms and low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42 levels, NPH is frequently misdiagnosed as Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease. <strong>Objective: </strong>To provide a comprehensive narrative review of the pathophysiology, diagnostic challenges, treatment options, and prognostic markers of NPH, with a particular focus on implications for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). <strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant literature published between 2000 and 2025 was retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using the keywords "normal pressure hydrocephalus," "cerebrospinal fluid dynamics," "ventriculoperitoneal shunting," and "biomarkers." Both clinical and experimental studies addressing NPH's pathophysiology, diagnostic modalities, and treatment outcomes were reviewed, with emphasis on studies applicable to LMIC contexts such as Pakistan. <strong>Results: </strong>Evidence indicates that disrupted CSF circulation and ventriculomegaly underlie NPH, with diffusion tensor imaging and arterial spin-labelling MRI offering diagnostic refinement. However, limited access to advanced neuroimaging and cultural perceptions of symptoms as "normal aging" contribute to underdiagnosis in LMICs. Ventriculoperitoneal shunting, particularly with fixed-pressure devices, consistently improves gait performance, while cognitive and urinary outcomes are variable. Post-shunt changes in CSF biomarkers (Aβ42, tau) and serum markers (BDNF, TRPV4) demonstrate potential prognostic value. Functional imaging further correlates reduced cerebral blood flow with symptom severity. <strong>Conclusion: </strong>NPH remains an under-recognized yet treatable neurological disorder. Increasing awareness, developing simplified diagnostic approaches, and ensuring cost-effective treatment strategies are essential to optimizing patient outcomes, particularly in resource-constrained settings.</em></p> Ali Qudratullah Shah, Rukan Aalamuddin Shah, Erum Khatoon, Anam Ramzan, Muhammad Bilawal Chawhan, Aakash Lund, Muneeb Rehman Kalhoro, Jawad Rehman Solangi, Abdul Wasay Soomro, Iftikhar Ahmed Shaikh Copyright (c) 2025 Ali Qudratullah Shah, Rukan Aalamuddin Shah, Erum Khatoon, Anam Ramzan, Muhammad Bilawal Chawhan, Aakash Lund, Muneeb Rehman Kalhoro, Jawad Rehman Solangi, Abdul Wasay Soomro, Iftikhar Ahmed Shaikh https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/1977 Thu, 02 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0000