https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/issue/feedBiological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal2025-10-31T04:46:26+00:00BCSRJeditor@bcsrj.comOpen Journal Systems<p>Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal (Biol. Clin. Sci. Res. J. eISSN: 2708-2261; pISSN: 2958-4728) is a peer-reviewed double blind monthly Journal. Articles for the Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal must be original reports of research not simultaneously submitted to or previously published in any other scientific or technical journal and must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing scientific concepts. The study reported should be applicable to a sizable geographic area or an area of ecological or economic significance and of potential interest to a significant number of scientists. Each calendar year will have one volume. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal publishes articles as soon as the final copy-edited version is approved by the authors rather than waiting for a collection of articles for a specific issue. Also, each article is published in its respective category. BCSRJ consider the following categories of articles; Original research Article, Short Research Article, Short communications, Review Article, Minireview Article, Systematic Reviews, Policy Papers, Commentaries / Opinion Article, Data Notes, Study Protocols, and pre-protocols, Method Article, Data Article, Case reports / Case studies, Clinical Practice Article, Grey literature government reports, Abstracts of scientific meetings, Letter to the Editor, Scholarly Book Review, Technical Note, Perspective, Correspondence, and News and Views. As a result, the page numbers in the ‘Table of Contents’ displayed for each issue will reflect this rather than numerical order. The journal was started aims to provide a platform of publications under the banner of <em><a href="http://medeyepublishers.com"><strong>MEDEYE Publishers</strong></a> </em>following eminent standards to the researchers, scholars, scientists, and professionals of Biological and Medical Sciences. The inclusion of multiple academic disciplines helps in pooling the knowledge from two or more fields of study to handle better-suited problems by finding solutions established on new understandings. The authors can submit manuscripts online through OJS System. Authors can submit their manuscripts to the editorial office along with any query through email at,</p> <p><strong>bcsrj.clinical@gmail.com</strong></p> <p>Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal publishes articles reporting original research articles are grouped by subject matter into all type of biological and medical research but not confined with the following categories: Medical Sciences, Clinical Sciences, Botany, Plant Sciences, Plant Molecular Biology, Plant Biotechnology, Plant Genetics, Plant Computational Biology, Plant Cell Biology, Plant Biochemistry, Plant Ecology, Agricultural Scienes, Agricultural Economics, Marine Sciences, Plant-Microbe interaction, Plant environmental interactions, Animal Sciences, Human Genetics, Animal Biotechnology.<br /><br /></p> <p><strong>Frequency of Journal </strong></p> <p><strong>• Monthly Publication:</strong> BCSRJ follows a monthly publication model. Articles are published in individual monthly issues upon completion of the peer review and final copy-editing process.<br /><strong>• Issue Structure:</strong> Each calendar year comprises 12 issues. Articles are published in their respective categories within each issue. Page numbering reflects the article's placement within an issue rather than a continuous sequence across the volume.</p>https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/2046The Infection Control Paradox: Exploring Knowledge and Practices of ICU Nurses Across Hospitals in Punjab, Pakistan2025-10-29T11:56:59+00:00Amina Sattarfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.com. Tehreemfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comSania Yaseenfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comFatima Batoolfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comMuhammad Danishfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.com<p style="text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph; line-height: 150%;"><em>Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) continue to pose a serious challenge to patient safety, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs) where patients are most susceptible. Nurses are central to infection prevention and control (IPC), yet a persistent gap between knowledge and practice undermines infection control efforts, especially in resource-constrained healthcare settings such as Pakistan. <strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate ICU nurses' knowledge and self-reported practices regarding IPC measures and to determine the relationship between these two domains in tertiary care hospitals across Punjab, Pakistan. <strong>Methods:</strong> A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 150 ICU nurses working in selected public and private tertiary hospitals. Data were gathered using a pre-validated structured questionnaire developed in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. Knowledge and practice levels were categorized as good (≥75%), moderate (50-74%), or poor (<50%). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, applying descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Pearson's correlation analysis. <strong>Results:</strong> The findings indicated moderate levels of knowledge (mean = 11.2 ± 2.1) and practice (mean = 10.6 ± 2.4) among the participants. Only 36% demonstrated good knowledge, while 32.7% exhibited good practices. Notable gaps were found in hand hygiene duration, sterilization techniques, needlestick injury management, and consistent use of N95 masks. Nurses with higher educational qualifications showed significantly better knowledge (p = 0.02), and those with greater years of experience demonstrated better practices (p = 0.01). A strong positive correlation was identified between knowledge and practice scores (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). <strong>Conclusion:</strong> ICU nurses in Punjab displayed moderate knowledge of IPC but suboptimal implementation in clinical practice. The observed knowledge-practice gap highlights the influence of both personal and institutional factors. Strengthening regular IPC training programs, ensuring continuous supervision, and enhancing resource availability are critical for fostering a robust infection control culture and reducing the burden of HAIs in ICUs.</em></p>2025-10-31T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Amina Sattar, . Tehreem, Sania Yaseen, Fatima Batool, Muhammad Danishhttps://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/2049Frequency of Factors Leading to the Development of Urolithiasis at SIUT, Karachi2025-10-31T04:46:26+00:00Syeda Zoha Abbasfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comSyed Arslan Shehzad Shahfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comHarris Hassan Qureshifaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comFarzeen Zehrafaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comNaveed Maherfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comManzoor Hussainfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comSyed Adibul Hassan Rizvifaisalhafeez01@hotmail.com<p><em>Urolithiasis is a common urological condition worldwide and a significant cause of morbidity, especially in regions with hot climates and dietary variations such as Pakistan. Understanding the contributing factors is essential for prevention and management. </em><strong><em>Objective:</em></strong><em> To determine the frequency of factors leading to the development of urolithiasis at SIUT, Karachi. </em><strong><em>Methodology:</em></strong> <em>We conducted this study on 385 participants aged 20-70 years presenting with acute renal colic and a confirmed ultrasonographic diagnosis of urolithiasis. Data on predefined demographic and risk factors were collected. </em><strong><em>Results:</em></strong> <em>The mean age of the 385 participants was 49.49 ± 14.09 years. A majority were male (62.3%), and the most prevalent modifiable risk factor was low water intake (65.7%), which was followed by obesity (51.9%) and aerated beverage consumption (56.4%). Comorbid risk conditions were highly prevalent, including hypertension (37.9%), anemia (48.8%), and diabetes mellitus (28.3%). A strong family history of urolithiasis was reported in 47.5% of the cohort. Other significant factors included an age greater than 50 years (53.8%) and smoking (24.9%). </em><strong><em>Conclusion:</em></strong><em> The risk factors leading to the development of urolithiasis were the high frequency of male sex and increasing age, with modifiable risks such as low water intake and comorbid metabolic conditions.</em></p>2025-10-31T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Syeda Zoha Abbas, Syed Arslan Shehzad Shah, Harris Hassan Qureshi, Farzeen Zehra, Naveed Maher, Manzoor Hussain, Syed Adibul Hassan Rizvihttps://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/2043Factors of Non-Adherence to Antihypertensive Medicine in the Elderly Population2025-10-28T09:13:31+00:00Neelam Nafeesfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comMansoor Ghanifaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comNabila Nafeesfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comSamina Kausarfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.com<p><em>Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, particularly among the elderly. Despite the availability of effective antihypertensive therapies, medication non-adherence remains a major barrier to optimal blood pressure control. Understanding the multifactorial determinants of non-adherence among elderly hypertensive patients in low- and middle-income countries like Pakistan is essential for designing targeted interventions. <strong>Objective:</strong> To identify the factors contributing to non-adherence to antihypertensive medication among elderly hypertensive patients attending tertiary care hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan. <strong>Methods:</strong> A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted at four public sector hospitals in Lahore from September 2019 to March 2020. A total of 200 hypertensive patients aged ≥60 years were recruited through purposive sampling. Data were collected using two standardized tools—the Drug Attitude Inventory-10 (DAI-10) and the Modified Drug Adherence Work-Up Tool (M-DRAW)—translated into Urdu and validated for internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.70 and 0.758, respectively). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic data. In contrast, chi-square, independent t-tests, and ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test were used to determine associations between demographic and adherence-related variables in SPSS version 20. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. <strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 66.74 ± 5.39 years; 52% were male, and 54.5% had no formal education. Most patients (73.5%) had been under treatment for >6 months, and 53.5% were taking three antihypertensive medications. The majority (68.5%) exhibited unintentional non-adherence, while 31.5% demonstrated intentional non-adherence. Financial burden (50%), pill burden (60.5%), and difficulty in maintaining medication schedules were the most frequent barriers. Condition-related factors (mean 3.0 ± 0.7) were the most significant contributors, followed by patient-related and socioeconomic factors (p< 0.001). Significant associations were found between perceived benefit of therapy and education level (p = 0.017), dose adjustment and number of tablets (p = 0.010), and gender with treatment doubts (p = 0.018). Beliefs and health perceptions more strongly influenced intentional non-adherence, whereas unintentional non-adherence was associated with financial and regimen-related constraints. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Non-adherence to antihypertensive medication among elderly patients is a multifaceted issue influenced by socioeconomic, educational, psychological, and treatment-related factors. Condition-related beliefs and patient-related perceptions play a dominant role, particularly in intentional non-adherence. Interventions should focus on patient education, simplifying medication regimens, enhancing family and social support, and providing financial assistance to improve long-term adherence and reduce hypertension-related complications in elderly populations.</em></p>2025-10-31T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Neelam Nafees, Mansoor Ghani, Nabila Nafees, Samina Kausarhttps://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/1900Change in 4% lidocaine Instillation in the endotracheal tube (ETT) before and after surgery in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia.2025-10-29T08:36:19+00:00Umar Farooqfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comSheikh Muhammad Ahmed Tariqfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comZafar Ullah Khanfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comMuhammad Umer Iqbal Buttfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comAhmed Masood Qureshifaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comMuhammad Tayyebfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.com<p><em>Post-operative sore throat and airway-related complications are common after general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Lidocaine instillation into the endotracheal tube cuff and lumen has been proposed to reduce these complications, but evidence remains variable. <strong>Objective:</strong> To evaluate the effect of 4% lidocaine instillation on post-operative airway morbidity in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. <strong>Methods:</strong> A quasi-experimental trial was conducted on 130 patients undergoing various elective surgeries under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Patients were divided into two groups: the lidocaine instillation group (n = 65) and the non-lidocaine group (n = 65). Demographic and intraoperative data were recorded. Airway complications, including sore throat, hoarseness, cough, dysphagia, and laryngospasm, were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of post-operative sore throat. <strong>Results:</strong> Post-operative airway complications increased significantly compared to pre-operative status, with sore throat (29.2%), cough (32.3%), hoarseness (20.0%), dysphagia (13.8%), and laryngospasm (6.2%) observed after surgery (all p < 0.05). Compared to the non-lidocaine group, the lidocaine group had significantly lower incidence of sore throat (18.5% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.010), hoarseness (12.3% vs. 27.7%, p = 0.032), cough (15.4% vs. 43.1%, p = 0.001), and dysphagia (6.2% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.018). Regression analysis showed that age ≥40 years, female sex, intubation duration ≥2 hours, cuff pressure >30 cmH₂O, and absence of lidocaine instillation were independent predictors of sore throat. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Instillation of 4% lidocaine in the endotracheal tube significantly reduces the incidence of common post-operative airway complications. Careful control of cuff pressure and limiting intubation duration further mitigates risk. These findings support the routine use of lidocaine instillation as a simple and effective strategy to improve post-anesthesia airway outcomes.</em></p>2025-10-31T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Umar Farooq, Sheikh Muhammad Ahmed Tariq, Zafar Ullah Khan, Muhammad Umer Iqbal Butt, Ahmed Masood Qureshi, Muhammad Tayyebhttps://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/2040Benign Breast Changes with Adenosis and Duct Ectasia: Diagnostic Challenges and Clinical Implications2025-10-27T11:01:13+00:00Nur Saeedfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.comZayn Chaudharyfaisalhafeez01@hotmail.com<p><em>Rapidly enlarging breast masses during pregnancy pose significant diagnostic challenges. Physiologic breast changes can mask or mimic underlying pathology, and limited biopsy samples may reveal only benign elements such as adenosis, duct ectasia, or tubular adenoma despite an underlying fibroepithelial lesion. <strong>Case Presentation:</strong> A 34-year-old pregnant woman in her second to third trimester presented with a 1.5-year history of a progressively enlarging left breast mass that rapidly increased in size and became fungating during pregnancy. Earlier histopathology revealed adenosis and duct ectasia, while fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) was reported as C3 ("atypical, probably benign"). Ultrasonography demonstrated an approximately 11 cm multilobulated, hypervascular, exophytic mass classified as BI-RADS 4 B. A wedge biopsy during pregnancy showed a tubular adenoma. Given the lesion's aggressive growth and clinicoradiologic–pathologic discordance, a total left mastectomy was performed. Final histopathology confirmed a benign phyllodes tumour with skin ulceration and a deep margin of 1 mm. <strong>Intervention and Outcome:</strong> The patient underwent a total mastectomy with complete tumour removal and no perioperative complications. Considering the close deep margin, structured postoperative surveillance was advised. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> In pregnancy, rapidly growing breast masses with benign or indeterminate histology warrant escalation to complete excision, especially when clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic findings are discordant. This case underscores diagnostic overlap among adenosis, duct ectasia, tubular adenoma, fibroadenoma, and phyllodes tumour and highlights the importance of margin-oriented surgery and long-term follow-up.</em></p>2025-10-31T00:00:00+00:00Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Saeed, Zayn Chaudhary