ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE THICKNESS OF ALVEOLAR BONE AND POSITION OF INCISOR IN CLASS I AND II MALOCCLUSIONS THROUGH LATERAL CEPHALOGRAMS

Authors

  • S SHABBIR Department of Orthodontics, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • H PERVEZ Department of Orthodontics, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • A WASAN Department of Orthodontics, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • R TARIQ Department of Orthodontics, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • RA KHAN Department of Orthodontics, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan
  • F JAHANGIR Department of Orthodontics, Jinnah Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.720

Keywords:

Alveolar Bone Thickness, Incisor Inclinations, Lateral Cephalograms, Malocclusion

Abstract

To assess the inclination of incisors and thickness of alveolar bone in malocclusions of Class I and Class II. A comparative study was conducted on 114 individuals in which incisor inclinations and their relationships with the alveolar bone were assessed by using lateral cephalograms. In the study individuals with Class I malocclusion, with a mean age of 18.6 years were recruited along with the individuals of Class II malocclusions with a mean age of 18.27 years. Almost, 114 lateral cephalograms were taken from the individuals. Out of them, 51 had class II malocclusion and 63 had class I malocclusion. The overall mandibular alveolar thickness showed no statistically significant difference between class I and class II malocclusion (P=.086), while there was a slight but statistically significant variation in the maxillary alveolar thickness (P=0.029). There was no significant distinction in the maxillary incisor inclination between the two groups (P=.603), whereas the root apex location lower labial was considerably more posterior (P <.001). However, it was discovered that Class II malocclusion patients had a substantially higher mandibular incisor inclination (P=.004).  In the study, the position of the mandibular incisor root apex varied significantly across classes I and II. The mandibular incisor root apex was therefore more posteriorly positioned in class II relative to the alveolar center.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yodthong N, Charoemratrote C, Leethanakul C. Factors related to alveolar bone thickness during upper incisor retraction. The Angle Orthodontist. 2013 May 1;83(3):394-401. http://doi:10.2319/062912-534.1. Epub 2012 Oct 8. PMID: 23043245; PMCID: PMC8763077.

Jäger, F., Mah, J.K. and Bumann, A., 2017. Periodontal bone changes after orthodontic tooth movement with fixed appliances: A cone-beam computed tomographic study. The Angle Orthodontist, 87(5), pp.672-680. http://doi:10.2319/102716-774.1. Epub 2017 May 29. PMID: 28553985; PMCID: PMC8357220.

Villela, H.M., 2020. Treatment of bimaxillary protrusion using intra- and extra-alveolar mini-screws associated with self-ligating brackets system. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, 25, pp.66-84.http://doi:10.1590/2177-6709.25.5.066-084.sar. PMID: 33206831; PMCID: PMC7668059

Proffit WR, Fields H, Msd DM, Larson B, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics, 6e: South Asia Edition-E-Book. Elsevier India; 2019 Jun 29.

Andrews, W.A., Abdulrazzaq, W.S., Hunt, J.E., Mendes, L.M. and Hallman, L.A., 2022. Incisor position and alveolar bone thickness: A comparative analysis of two untreated samples using lateral cephalograms. The Angle Orthodontist, 92(1), pp.3-10. http://doi:10.2319/022320-122.1. PMID: 34383019; PMCID: PMC8691463.

Medrano Vargas, C.E., 2019. Relación de la inclinación dentoalveolar de los incisivos centrales superiores con el grosor óseo anteroposterior en registros tomográficos de pacientes evaluados en el Instituto de Diagnóstico Maxilofacial.

Sun, Q., Lu, W., Zhang, Y., Peng, L., Chen, S. and Han, B., 2021. Morphological changes of the anterior alveolar bone due to retraction of anterior teeth: a retrospective study. Head & Face Medicine, 17(1), pp.1-12. http:// doi:10.1186/s13005-021-00277-z. PMID: 34271939; PMCID: PMC8284009.

Pan, Y. and Chen, S., 2019. Contact of the incisive canal and upper central incisors causing root resorption after retraction with orthodontic mini-implants: A CBCT study. The Angle Orthodontist, 89(2), pp.200-205. http://doi:10.2319/042318-311.1. Epub 2018 Nov 28. PMID: 30484326; PMCID: PMC8120876.

Al-Khawaja NF, Nahidh M, Abdulsaheb RJ. Assessment of maxillary incisors' angulation and position in different types of malocclusions using cone-beam computed tomography. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry. 2021 Oct;12(4):401. http://doi:10.4103/ccd.ccd_743_20. Epub 2021 Dec 21. PMID: 35068840; PMCID: PMC8740794.

Charles, R., Hood, B., Derosier, J.M., Gosbee, J.W., Li, Y., Caird, M.S., Biermann, J.S. and Hake, M.E., 2016. How to perform a root cause analysis for workup and future prevention of medical errors: a review. Patient safety in surgery, 10, pp.1-5. http://doi:10.1186/s13037-016-0107-8. PMID: 27688807; PMCID: PMC5031337.

Haneen, S., Rajesh, R.N.G., Gujar, A.N. and Kondody, R., 2023. Comparison of Alveolar Bone Thickness, Sagittal Root Positions, and Arch Forms in Class I, II, and III Malocclusions: A Cephalometric Study. Cureus, 15(4). http://doi:10.7759/cureus.37272 PMID: 37168213; PMCID: PMC10164607.

Oh, S.H., Nahm, K.Y., Kim, S.H. and Nelson, G., 2020. Alveolar bone thickness and fenestration of incisors in untreated Korean patients with skeletal class III malocclusion: A retrospective 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study. Imaging science in dentistry, 50(1), p.9. http://doi:10.5624/isd.2020.50.1.9. Epub 2020 Mar 17. PMID: 32206615; PMCID: PMC7078404.

Christensen, J.R., Fields, H. and Sheats, R.D., 2019. Treatment planning and management of orthodontic problems. In Pediatric Dentistry (pp. 512-553). Elsevier.

Alsaggaf, D.H., Afify, A.R., Zawawi, K.H. and Alsulaimani, F.F., 2022. Factors influencing the orthodontic treatment plan in Class II malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 161(6), pp.829-837. http://doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.034. Epub 2022 Jan 29. PMID: 35094890.

Choi, Y.J., Chang, J.E., Chung, C.J., Tahk, J.H. and Kim, K.H., 2017. Prediction of the long-term success of orthopedic treatment in skeletal Class III malocclusions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 152(2), pp.193-203. http://doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.12.018. PMID: 28760281

Lund, H., Gröndahl, K. and Gröndahl, H.G., 2012. Cone beam computed tomography evaluations of marginal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic treatment combined with premolar extractions. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 120(3), pp.201-211.

Wang, X.M., Meng, W.Y., Wang, W.N., Huo, Y.F. and Xue, H., 2023. Accuracy and eligibility of Bonwill⁃ Hawley arch form established by CBCT image for dental crowding measurement: a comparative study with the conventional brass wire and caliper methods. Clinical Oral Investigations, pp.1-12.

Morais, J.F., Melsen, B., de Freitas, K.M., Castello Branco, N., Garib, D.G. and Cattaneo, P.M., 2018. Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: A cone beam computed tomographic study. The Angle Orthodontist, 88(6), pp.748-756.

Oh, S.H., Nahm, K.Y., Kim, S.H. and Nelson, G., 2020. Alveolar bone thickness and fenestration of incisors in untreated Korean patients with skeletal class III malocclusion: A retrospective 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography study. Imaging science in dentistry, 50(1), p.9.

Gracco, A., Lombardo, L., Mancuso, G., Gravina, V. and Siciliani, G., 2009. Upper incisor position and bony support in untreated patients as seen on CBCT. The Angle Orthodontist, 79(4), pp.692-702. http://doi:10.2319/081908-437.1. PMID: 19537878.

Baysal, A., Ucar, F.I., Buyuk, S.K., Ozer, T. and Uysal, T., 2013. Alveolar bone thickness and lower incisor position in skeletal Class I and Class II malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. The Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 43(3), pp.134-140. http://doi:10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.134. Epub 2013 Jun 24. PMID: 23814708; PMCID: PMC3694205.

Chaimongkol, P., Thongudomporn, U. and Lindauer, S.J., 2018. Alveolar bone response to light-force tipping and bodily movement in maxillary incisor advancement: A prospective randomized clinical trial. The Angle Orthodontist, 88(1), pp.58-66. http://doi:10.2319/070717-449.1. Epub 2017 Oct 30. PMID: 29083225; PMCID: PMC8315714

Ahmad, S.N., Ahmad, A., Ullah, S., Kayani, H., Khattak, R. and Ullah, S., 2022. Comparative Analysis of Incisor Positioning and Alveolar Bone Thickness using Lateral Cephalograms. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences, 16(02), pp.370-370.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

SHABBIR , S., PERVEZ , H., WASAN , A., TARIQ , R., KHAN , R., & JAHANGIR , F. (2024). ANALYSIS BETWEEN THE THICKNESS OF ALVEOLAR BONE AND POSITION OF INCISOR IN CLASS I AND II MALOCCLUSIONS THROUGH LATERAL CEPHALOGRAMS. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2024(1), 720. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.720