Role of DJ Stenting in Equivocal Symptomatic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction

Authors

  • Khansa Khalil Department of Urology, Gujranwala Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, Pakistan
  • Khalid Hussain Department of Urology, Gujranwala Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, Pakistan
  • Maria Tariq Department of Urology, Gujranwala Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, Pakistan
  • Jawad Ahmed Department of Urology, Gujranwala Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, Pakistan
  • Bilal Akhtar Department of Urology, Gujranwala Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, Pakistan
  • Ali Umair Tariq Department of Urology, Gujranwala Teaching Hospital, Gujranwala, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1966

Keywords:

Double-J stent, Ureteropelvic junction obstruction, Pain relief, Hydronephrosis, Renal function

Abstract

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a common cause of renal obstruction, with equivocal symptomatic cases posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Double-J (DJ) stenting serves both as a therapeutic and diagnostic tool, relieving obstruction and clarifying disease severity. However, its efficacy and safety in such cases remain a matter of debate. Objective: To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of temporary DJ stenting in adults with equivocal symptomatic UPJO. Methods: This descriptive single-center study was conducted at Gujranwala Teaching Hospital, Pakistan, from January 2025 to March 2025. Fifty adult patients (18–60 years) with flank pain >3 months, mild to moderate hydronephrosis on ultrasound, and equivocal obstruction on diuretic renogram (T½ 10–20 min) were enrolled. All underwent cystoscopic DJ stent placement for three weeks. Pain scores (VAPS), renal pelvis anteroposterior diameter (APD), and diuretic renogram T½ were recorded at baseline, during stenting, and at 2–6 weeks post-removal. Outcomes were categorized as full response (VAPS < 3 and T½ < 10 min), partial response, or non-response. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests and stratified analyses, with p<0.05 considered significant. Results: The mean age was 34.6 ± 9.5 years, with 66% of patients being male. Baseline VAPS was 7.1 ± 1.2, mean APD 19.6 ± 5.1 mm, and T½ 15.2 ± 2.3 min. At 6 weeks post-removal, mean VAPS improved to 2.3 ± 0.6 (Δ −4.8, p<0.001), APD to 10.4 ± 3.1 mm (Δ −9.2, p<0.001), and T½ to 8.1 ± 1.7 min (Δ −7.1, p<0.001). A full response was achieved in 80% of patients, a partial response in 12%, and 8% were non-responders requiring pyeloplasty. Better outcomes were observed in patients with symptom duration <6 months and preserved baseline renal function. Complications were mild and self-limiting, with no Clavien–Dindo grade 3 or higher events. Conclusion: Temporary DJ stenting is an effective and safe intervention in patients with equivocal symptomatic UPJO, providing significant improvement in pain relief and renal function with minimal complications. Early intervention and careful follow-up optimize outcomes, supporting its role as both a therapeutic and diagnostic strategy in resource-limited healthcare settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cheng W., Chiu Y., Fan Y., Lin S., & Chen S... Risks of forgotten double-J ureteric stents after ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study. Scientific Reports 2020; 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77771-y

Patil S., Raghuvanshi K., Jain D., & Raval A... Forgotten ureteral double-j stents and related complications: a real-world experience. African Journal of Urology 2020; 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-020-0020-3

Jendouzi O., Lamghari A., Mounir J., Harchaoui A., Alami M., & Ameur A. Knotted double J ureteral stent: a case report and literature review. Pan African Medical Journal 2022; 43. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2022.43.5.34538

Kayler L., Zendejas I., Schain D., & Magliocca J... Ureteral stent placement and BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Infectious Disease 2013; 15(2):202-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.12051

Thapa B., Thapa N., & Bhandari B.. Fate of forgotten DJ Stent. Medical Journal of Shree Birendra Hospital 2018; 17(2):38-43. https://doi.org/10.3126/mjsbh.v17i2.19901

Vaddi S., Khetavath S., KRV R., & M D... Renal pelvic perforation due to double J stent insertion in a nine-year-old child: an unusual complication of a routinely done procedure. International Journal of Surgery Science 2021; 5(1):86-87. https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2021.v5.i1b.593

Mahendra I., Santosa K., Oka A., & Putra I... Comparison of clinical outcomes between DJ stent insertion and percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to cervical cancer. International Journal of Scientific Advances 2023; 4(2). https://doi.org/10.51542/ijscia.v4i2.7

Hamarat M., Üstün F., Özcan S., Bağcıoğlu M., Demirkol M., & Turgut B.. The effect of ureteral stents on postoperative pain. Anadolu KliniğiTıpBilimleriDergisi 2021; 26(1):54-59. https://doi.org/10.21673/anadoluklin.778906

Segalen T., Lebdai S., Panayotopoulos P., Culty T., Brassart É., Riou J.et al.. Double J stenting evaluation after ureteroscopy for urolithiasis. Progrès en Urologie 2019; 29(12):589-595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2019.08.266

Demour S., Alrabadi A., Alsharif A., Ababneh M., Melhem M., Mansi H.et al.. Ureteric stenting versus non-stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial. European Urology Supplements 2019; 18(7):e2841. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1569-9056(19)33028-3

Demour S., Alrabadi A., AlSharif A., Ababneh M., Al-Taher R., Melhem M.et al.. Ureteric stenting vs not stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective randomised trial. Arab Journal of Urology 2020; 18(3):169-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598x.2020.1762280

Dinatha G., Oka A., & Santosa K.. Predictive factors influencing the outcomes of double "j" stent placement in stage IIIB cervical cancer patients with hydronephrosis complications. JBN (JurnalBedah Nasional) 2022;6(1):1. https://doi.org/10.24843/jbn.2022.v06.i01.p01

Mahendra I., Santosa K., Oka A., & Putra I... Comparison of clinical outcomes between DJ stent insertion and percutaneous nephrostomy in patients with obstructive uropathy due to cervical cancer. International Journal of Scientific Advances 2023; 4(2). https://doi.org/10.51542/ijscia.v4i2.7

Khan Z., Ghani A., Rashid Z., & Aziz A... Efficacy and safety of double J stenting (djs) and percutaneous nephrostomy (pcn) in patients with obstructive uropathy. JHRR 2024; 4(1):1334-1338. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i1.620

Aboutaleb H., Ali T., Gawish M., & Omar M. Fluoroscopy-free double-j stent placement through ureteroscope working channel postuncomplicated ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy: a novel technique. Urology Annals 2019; 11(1):39. https://doi.org/10.4103/ua.ua_59_18

Pecoraro A., Peretti D., Tian Z., Aimar R., Niculescu G., Alleva G.et al.. Treatment of ureteral stent-related symptoms. Urologia Internationalis 2021;107(3):288-303. https://doi.org/10.1159/000518387.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Khalil, K. ., Hussain, K. ., Tariq, M. ., Ahmed, J. ., Akhtar, B. ., & Tariq, A. U. . (2025). Role of DJ Stenting in Equivocal Symptomatic Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 6(6), 411–414. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1966

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles