EVALUATING THE EFFICIENCY OF NON-PHARMACOLOGICAL PAIN MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES DURING LABOR AND DELIVERY

PK KAKAR; MF ANILA; AGM KHAN; S SINDHU

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.489

Authors

PK KAKAR Department of Gynaecology, Civil Hospital Quetta Balochistan, Pakistan
MF ANILA Department of Gynaecology, Civil Hospital Karachi, Pakistan
AGM KHAN Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Unit 1 Civil/SPH Quetta, Pakistan
S SINDHU Civil Hospital Hyderabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.489

Keywords:

Alternative therapeutics, Aromatherapy; Labor, Medicinal treatment, obstetrics, Pain management

Abstract

Labor and delivery is a natural procedure that causes women significant pain and discomfort. Many women choose pharmacological pain management techniques, yet there is growing interest in non-pharmacological pain management techniques, viewed as safer and more natural than pharmacological methods. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of non-pharmacological pain management techniques during labor and delivery. In a randomized controlled trial, we randomly assigned 246 expectant women to either a non-pharmacological intervention or a control group. During labor and delivery, the non-pharmacological intervention group received a combination of relaxation techniques, including massaging and physical therapy, aromatherapy, TENS, and mixed interventions. The control group received standard care devoid of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Pain levels were measured using a visual analog scale at 30-minute intervals. Additionally, the length of labor, delivery mode, and birth outcomes were recorded using the APGAR score system. The demographic characteristics of patients in both groups were comparable and non-significant in variations (p>0.05). Forty participants utilized each non-pharmacologic technique. Comparing VAS pain scale scores at 30-minute intervals, the distribution of pain intensity levels was comparable between the groups. The larger fraction of neonates in the non-pharmacological group had higher APGAR scores, indicating no need for immediate medical attention. Based on a reasonable comparison of the effectiveness of various interventions for managing labor pain and distress, it was found that 9 (22.5%) of 40 patients who received massaging therapy reported low efficacy in managing labor pain, 13 (32.5%) reported moderate efficacy, and 28 (70%) reported high efficacy. In the aromatherapy of 40 patients, 16 reported low efficacy, 21 reported moderate efficacy, and 13 reported high efficacy in managing labor pain. Ten patients (25%) reported low efficacy, 12 patients (30%) reported moderate efficacy, and 28 patients (70%) reported high efficacy in managing labor pain through TENS. It provided cost-effective and safe alternatives to pharmaceutical interventions during labor and delivery. When properly implemented, these techniques reduced pain intensity comparable to commercial medicines while significantly improving the birthing experience and potentially contributing to better maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aziato, L., Acheampong, A. K., and Umoar, K. L. (2017). Labour pain experiences and perceptions: a qualitative study among post-partum women in Ghana. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 17, 1-9.

Chang, C.-Y., Gau, M.-L., Huang, C.-J., and Cheng, H.-m. (2022). Effects of non-pharmacological coping strategies for reducing labor pain: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Plos one 17, e0261493.

Czech, I., Fuchs, P., Fuchs, A., Lorek, M., Tobolska-Lorek, D., Drosdzol-Cop, A., and Sikora, J. (2018). Pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of labour pain relief—establishment of effectiveness and comparison. International journal of environmental research and public health 15, 2792.

da Matta Machado Fernandes, L., Lansky, S., Reis Passos, H., T. Bozlak, C., and A. Shaw, B. (2021). Brazilian women’s use of evidence-based practices in childbirth after participating in the Senses of Birth intervention: a mixed-methods study. PloS one 16, e0248740.

Daries, A. S. (2023). The history of physical education at Stellenbosch University, 1937-2019, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.

Harkins, J., Carvalho, B., Evers, A., Mehta, S., and Riley, E. T. (2010). Survey of the factors associated with a woman's choice to have an epidural for labor analgesia. Anesthesiology research and practice 2010.

Heim, M. A., and Makuch, M. Y. (2022). Pregnant women’s knowledge of non-pharmacological techniques for pain relief during childbirth. European journal of midwifery 6.

Hu, Y., Lu, H., Huang, J., and Zang, Y. (2021). Efficacy and safety of non‐pharmacological interventions for labour pain management: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta‐analysis. Journal of Clinical Nursing 30, 3398-3414.

Ingram, M. A., Brady, S., and Peacock, A. S. (2022). The barriers to offering non-pharmacological pain management as an initial option for laboring women: A review of the literature. European Journal of Midwifery 6.

Jones, L., Othman, M., Dowswell, T., Alfirevic, Z., Gates, S., Newburn, M., Jordan, S., Lavender, T., and Neilson, J. P. (2012). Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

Konlan, K. D., Afaya, A., Mensah, E., Suuk, A. N., and Kombat, D. I. (2021). Non-pharmacological interventions of pain management used during labour; an exploratory descriptive qualitative study of puerperal women in Adidome Government Hospital of the Volta Region, Ghana. Reproductive health 18, 1-11.

Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., Adeyi, O., Barker, P., Daelmans, B., and Doubova, S. V. (2018). High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. The Lancet global health 6, e1196-e1252.

Labor, S., and Maguire, S. (2008). The pain of labour. Reviews in pain 2, 15-19.

Likis, F. E., Andrews, J. C., Collins, M. R., Lewis, R. M., Seroogy, J. J., Starr, S. A., Walden, R. R., and McPheeters, M. L. (2014). Nitrous oxide for the management of labor pain: a systematic review. Anesthesia & Analgesia 118, 153-167.

Lindholm, A., and Hildingsson, I. (2015). Women's preferences and received pain relief in childbirth–a prospective longitudinal study in a northern region of Sweden. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare 6, 74-81.

Mascarenhas, V. H. A., Lima, T. R., Negreiros, F. d. S., Santos, J. D. M., Moura, M. Á. P., Gouveia, M. T. d. O., and Jorge, H. M. F. (2019). Scientific evidence on non-pharmacological methods for relief of labor pain. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem 32, 350-357.

Mooventhan, A., and Nivethitha, L. (2014). Scientific evidence-based effects of hydrotherapy on various systems of the body. North American journal of medical sciences 6, 199.

Olza, I., Uvnas-Moberg, K., Ekström-Bergström, A., Leahy-Warren, P., Karlsdottir, S. I., Nieuwenhuijze, M., Villarmea, S., Hadjigeorgiou, E., Kazmierczak, M., and Spyridou, A. (2020). Birth as a neuro-psycho-social event: An integrative model of maternal experiences and their relation to neurohormonal events during childbirth. Plos one 15, e0230992.

Pietrzak, J., Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, W., Tomaszek, L., and Grzybowska, M. E. (2022). A Cross-Sectional Survey of Labor Pain Control and Women’s Satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, 1741.

Smith, C. A., Levett, K. M., Collins, C. T., Armour, M., Dahlen, H. G., and Suganuma, M. (2018). Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Thomson, G., Feeley, C., Moran, V. H., Downe, S., and Oladapo, O. T. (2019). Women’s experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth: a qualitative systematic review. Reproductive health 16, 1-20.

Uvnäs-Moberg, K., Ekström-Bergström, A., Berg, M., Buckley, S., Pajalic, Z., Hadjigeorgiou, E., Kotłowska, A., Lengler, L., Kielbratowska, B., and Leon-Larios, F. (2019). Maternal plasma levels of oxytocin during physiological childbirth–a systematic review with implications for uterine contractions and central actions of oxytocin. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 19, 1-17.

Vickers, A., and Zollman, C. (1999). ABC of complementary medicine: acupuncture. BMJ: British Medical Journal 319, 973.

Walter, M. H., Abele, H., and Plappert, C. F. (2021). The role of oxytocin and the effect of stress during childbirth: neurobiological basics and implications for mother and child. Frontiers in endocrinology 12, 1409.

Zuarez-Easton, S., Erez, O., Zafran, N., Carmeli, J., Garmi, G., and Salim, R. (2023). Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Options for Pain Relief During Labor: an Expert Review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.