Comparison of Functional Outcomes After Using Hamstring Graft Versus Peroneus Longus Graft Reconstruction in Patients Having Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1962Keywords:
Anterior cruciate ligament, ACL reconstruction, hamstring graft, peroneus longus tendon, IKDC score, orthopaedic surgery, randomized controlled trialAbstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed orthopedic procedure, with autologous grafts, such as hamstring and peroneus longus tendons, widely used. Emerging evidence suggests that the peroneus longus tendon may offer comparable or superior functional outcomes with minimal donor-site morbidity, yet limited comparative data are available in the Pakistani population. Objective: To compare the functional outcomes of ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon grafts versus peroneus longus tendon grafts, assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at three months postoperatively. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Nishtar Hospital, Multan, from 15 February to 15 May 2025, enrolling 78 patients aged 20–50 years with isolated ACL injuries. Participants were randomized into two equal groups: Group A underwent ACL reconstruction using a hamstring tendon autograft, while Group B received an autograft from the peroneus longus tendon. Standardized postoperative rehabilitation was followed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the IKDC score at three months. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22, with independent t-tests and stratified analyses to control for effect modifiers. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean IKDC score was significantly higher in the peroneus longus group (83.1 ± 5.8) compared with the hamstring group (78.6 ± 6.9) (p < 0.01). Stratified analyses demonstrated consistently higher IKDC scores across age groups, gender, residence, and socioeconomic strata, with no subgroup favoring the hamstring graft. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Peroneus longus autograft demonstrated superior early postoperative functional outcomes compared with the hamstring autograft. These findings support the use of the peroneus longus tendon as a reliable and effective alternative for ACL reconstruction in the Pakistani population.
Downloads
References
Babu P, Choudhary P. The role of autologous hamstring graft in improving functional outcome after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study at GGH, Kurnool. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2023;16(11):184-187. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2023.v16i11.48303
Agrawal S, Hegde A, Rao B, Mane P, Shetty C, Khanna V, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft for primary arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2023;13(2):252. https://doi.org/10.32098/mltj.02.2023.08
He J, Tang Q, Ernst S, Linde M, Smolinski P, Wu S, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(9):2869-2879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06279-9
Butt U, Vuletić F, Shaikh M, Khan A, Rehman G, Shah I, et al. Five-year outcomes following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing quadruple hamstring and peroneus longus tendon autografts: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024;145(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05639-1
Vijay C, Santosh M, Avinash C, Adarsh T. Is peroneus longus autograft a better alternative to the hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A randomized controlled study. J Orthop Trauma Rehabil. 2022;29(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917221088335
Mostafa I, Zayed E, Ibrahim I. Peroneus longus autograft versus hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: one-year follow-up comparative study. 2024. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4349945/v1
Nepal S, Gupta M, Panthee R, Kafle G, Sah R. Correlation of anthropometric measurements with hamstring graft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Nepalese population: a prospective observational study. J Karnali Acad Health Sci. 2023;6(3):26-30. https://doi.org/10.61814/jkahs.v6i3.858
Yadav S, Shukla V, Sahani R, Sharma M, Yadav A, Dwivedi A, et al. Comparative analysis of functional outcomes of arthroscopic single bundle ACL reconstruction utilizing hamstring versus peroneus tendon grafts. Int J Appl Res. 2023;9(1):35-38. https://doi.org/10.36106/ijar/1201231
Ueda Y, Matsushita T, Shibata Y, Takiguchi K, Ono K, Kida A, et al. Association between meeting return-to-sport criteria and psychological readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022;10(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221093985
Phatony C, Chaniago H, Rasyid F, Phatama K. Comparing the stiffness of the peroneus longus tendon versus the hamstrings in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Asian J Sports Med. 2021;12(4). https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.110160
Kumar N, Halbhavi M, Gouthamraj H, Santhosh N, Shivanna H, Sahana V. A long-term comparison of the outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable interference screw and endobutton on the femur. J Orthop Case Rep. 2024;14(5):166-175. https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i05.4472
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sadam Hussain, Hafiz Muhammad Kamran Saddiqui, Areej Fatima, Sohail Safdar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


