COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL HIGH LIGATION AND STRIPPING AND RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION FOR GREAT SAPHENOUS VARICOSE VEINS

Authors

  • A MUSHTAQ Department of General Surgery, Resident Vascular Surgery, Doctor Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
  • I SADIQ Department of Vascular Surgery, Doctor Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
  • M NASIR Department of General Surgery, Resident Vascular Surgery, Doctor Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
  • MU SALEEM Department of Vascular Surgery, Doctor Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
  • MA SADIQ Department of Surgery, Jinnah Hospital Lahore, Pakistan
  • MH SADIQ Department of Surgery, Services Hospital Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.420

Keywords:

Radiofrequency Ablation, Conventional Surgery, Great Saphenous Varicose Veins

Abstract

The prospective study was conducted from December 2022 to May 2023 to assess patient-based, radiological, and clinical outcomes after conventional surgery and radiofrequency ablation for great saphenous varicose veins. Patients were randomly divided to undergo conventional surgery or RFA. American Society of Anesthesiologists fitness grade, Venous Disability Score (VDS), Total Clinical Severity Score (TCSS), Michael's, and CEAP clinical classes were recorded. VEINES-QoL/Sym questionnaire and Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire were used to estimate baseline QoL. Patients were called for follow-up at the end of 1st and 5th week. The study was conducted on a total of 110 patients. Patients were randomly divided; 57 underwent RFA, and 53 underwent conventional surgery. Results showed that the difference between both groups regarding anesthesia induction, recovery, and discharge from surgery was insignificant. RFA had significantly longer total theater time compared to conventional surgery. Duplex imaging showed that RFA resulted in successful ablation except in two cases where veins had segmental brisk flow. These cases were retreated successfully. Conventional surgery only had the problem of incomplete stripping (6 cases). Post-operative pain, bruising, and the need for analgesia were significantly higher following conservative surgery. Patients in the RFA group returned to work and normal activities more quickly than the conventional surgery group. It is concluded that RFA had a longer intervention time but significantly better outcomes than conventional surgery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barakat, Y. M. E. R., Khattab, M. S., Eldin, S. M., AboElneel, H. A., Abd El, M. A. E.-M., and Rizk, S. (2022). A prospective randomized study comparing endovenous radiofrequency ablation and conventional surgery for primary great saphenous reflux. The Egyptian Journal of Surgery 41, 23-29.

De Maeseneer, M. G., Kakkos, S. K., Aherne, T., Baekgaard, N., Black, S., Blomgren, L., Giannoukas, A., Gohel, M., de Graaf, R., and Hamel-Desnos, C. (2022). Editor's choice–European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2022 clinical practice guidelines on the management of chronic venous disease of the lower limbs. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 63, 184-267.

Epstein, D., Bootun, R., Diop, M., Ortega-Ortega, M., Lane, T. R., and Davies, A. H. (2022). Cost-effectiveness analysis of current varicose veins treatments. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders 10, 504-513. e7.

Farah, M. H., Nayfeh, T., Urtecho, M., Hasan, B., Amin, M., Sen, I., Wang, Z., Prokop, L. J., Lawrence, P. F., and Gloviczki, P. (2022). A systematic review supporting the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and the American Vein and Lymphatic Society guidelines on the management of varicose veins. Journal of vascular surgery: venous and lymphatic disorders 10, 1155-1171.

Gao, R.-D., Qian, S.-Y., Wang, H.-H., Liu, Y.-S., and Ren, S.-Y. (2022). Strategies and challenges in treatment of varicose veins and venous insufficiency. World Journal of Clinical Cases 10, 5946.

Hamann, S., Timmer-de Mik, L., Fritschy, W., Kuiters, G., Nijsten, T., and Bos, R. (2019). Randomized clinical trial of endovenous laser ablation versus direct and indirect radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. Journal of British Surgery 106, 998-1004.

Karam, B., Haddad, F., Ataya, K., Jaafar, R., and Nassar, H. (2019). Long-term results of Endovenous Laser Therapy (EVLT) of saphenous vein reflux: up to 9 years follow-up. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 58, e766.

Müller, L., and Alm, J. (2020). Feasibility and technique of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of recurrent varicose veins deriving from the sapheno-femoral junction—A case series of 35 consecutive procedures. Plos one 15, e0235656.

Rai, A., Porsalman, M., Khatony, A., and Sobhiyeh, M. (2019). Comparison of foam sclerotherapy versus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary varicose veins due to incompetent great saphenous vein: randomized clinical trial. Journal of Vascular Nursing 37, 226-231.

Rajendran, S., Nair, H. R., and Thaikattil, N. J. (2022). Ultrasound-assisted varicose vein surgery and endovenous laser ablation using 1470-nm laser for treatment of great saphenous vein incompetence has similar outcomes at 1 year in a single-center prospective randomized study. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders 10, 370-375.

Sandhya, P., Mohil, R., and Sricharan, R. (2020). Randomised controlled study to compare radiofrequency ablation with minimally invasive ultrasound-guided non-flush ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein in the treatment of varicose veins. The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England 102, 525-531.

Sincos, I. R., Baptista, A. P. W., Coelho Neto, F., Labropoulos, N., Alledi, L. B., Marins, E. M. d., Puggina, J., Belczak, S. Q., Cardoso, M. G., and Aun, R. (2019). Prospective randomized trial comparing radiofrequency ablation and complete saphenous vein stripping in patients with mild to moderate chronic venous disease with a 3-year follow-up. Einstein (Sao Paulo) 17.

Tauraginskii, R. A., Lurie, F., Agalarov, R., Simakov, S., and Borsuk, D. (2022). Blood flow from competent tributaries is likely contributor to distally increasing reflux volume in incompetent great saphenous vein. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders 10, 69-74.

Tawfik, A. M., Sorour, W. A., and El-Laboudy, M. E. (2020). Laser ablation versus mechanochemical ablation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders 8, 211-215.

Whiteley, M. S. (2022). Current best practice in the management of varicose veins. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, 567-583.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-27

How to Cite

MUSHTAQ , A., SADIQ , I., NASIR , M., SALEEM , M., SADIQ , M., & SADIQ , M. (2023). COMPARISON BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL HIGH LIGATION AND STRIPPING AND RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION FOR GREAT SAPHENOUS VARICOSE VEINS. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2023(1), 420. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.420

Most read articles by the same author(s)