INTRAOPERATIVE LOCAL BUPIVACAINE WOUND INFILTRATION VERSUS TRADITIONAL SYSTEMATIC ANALGESIA: A COMPARISON IN TERM OF POST-OPERATIVE PAIN

Authors

  • A AHMAD Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital Medical Teaching Institute Peshawar, Pakistan
  • A ARIF Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital Medical Teaching Institute Peshawar, Pakistan
  • A ATAULLAH Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital Medical Teaching Institute Peshawar, Pakistan
  • F MUHAMMAD Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital Medical Teaching Institute Peshawar, Pakistan
  • MA KHAN Department of Surgery, Lady Reading Hospital Medical Teaching Institute Peshawar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1281

Keywords:

Intraoperative Bupivacaine, Pain, Systematic Analgesia.

Abstract

Effective management of post-operative pain is essential for patient recovery and satisfaction, especially in procedures like appendectomies where pain management can influence overall outcomes. Traditional systemic analgesia, while effective, often comes with side effects and limitations. Local infiltration of anesthetics like bupivacaine may provide a targeted approach to pain control with fewer systemic effects. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of intraoperative local bupivacaine wound infiltration versus traditional systemic analgesia in managing post-operative pain in patients undergoing appendectomies. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, following approval from the hospital's Ethical Committee. A total of 60 patients, who consented and met eligibility criteria, were enrolled. All patients underwent appendectomy under general anesthesia, followed by random allocation into two groups. Group A received 0.5% bupivacaine for local wound infiltration, while Group B did not. Both groups were administered intravenous tramadol on demand, with a maximum dose of 400 mg per 24 hours. Post-operative pain was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 4, 12, and 24 hours post-surgery. Stratified analysis by age and gender was also performed. Results: The study population (mean age: 41.13 ± 7.96 years) included 34 males (56.7%) and 26 females (43.3%). Group A (bupivacaine group) had a significantly lower mean post-operative pain score (3.33 ± 0.66) compared to Group B (systemic analgesia group) with a score of 5.30 ± 0.95 (p=0.00). Age-based stratification revealed significant differences: among 22-30-year-olds, Group A scored 3.00 versus 6.00 in Group B (p=0.00); for 31-50-year-olds, Group A scored 3.36 compared to 5.33 in Group B (p=0.00); and for those over 50, scores were 3.33 in Group A and 4.50 in Group B (p=0.04). Both male and female patients in Group A experienced significantly lower pain scores compared to Group B (p=0.00 for both). Conclusion: Intraoperative bupivacaine wound infiltration significantly reduces post-operative pain in appendectomy patients compared to traditional systemic analgesia. These findings support its use as an effective pain control method. Further research is recommended to optimize dosing and assess the combined use with other analgesics to enhance pain management across various surgical procedures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Meissner W, Huygen F, Neugebauer EA, Osterbrink J, Benhamou D, Betteridge N, et al. Management of acute pain in the postoperative setting: the importance of quality indicators. Current medical research and opinion. 2018;34(1):187-96.

Small C, Laycock H. Acute postoperative pain management. Journal of British Surgery. 2020;107(2):e70-e80.

Bach-Rojecky L, Vađunec D, Žunić K, Kurija J, Šipicki S, Gregg R, et al. Continuing war on pain: a personalized approach to the therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids. Personalized medicine. 2019;16(2):171-84.

Brogan SE, Mandyam S, Odell DW. Nonopioid analgesics. Pharmacology and Physiology for Anesthesia: Elsevier; 2019. p. 369-89.

Hebbes C, Lambert D. Non-opioid analgesic drugs. Anaesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine. 2008;9(2):79-83.

Stamenkovic DM, Bezmarevic M, Bojic S, Unic-Stojanovic D, Stojkovic D, Slavkovic DZ, et al. Updates on wound infiltration use for postoperative pain management: a narrative review. Journal of clinical medicine. 2021;10(20):4659.

De Cassai A, Bonanno C, Sandei L, Finozzi F, Carron M, Marchet A. PECS II block is associated with lower incidence of chronic pain after breast surgery. The Korean journal of pain. 2019;32(4):286-91.

Abrão J, Antunes M, Vicente Garcia L. Local anesthetics infiltration and wound healing process. Topics in Local Anesthetics. 2020;119.

Jankovic D. Regional nerve blocks and infiltration therapy: Textbook and color atlas: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.

Ilfeld BM, Eisenach JC, Gabriel RA. Clinical effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine administered by infiltration or peripheral nerve block to treat postoperative pain: a narrative review. Anesthesiology. 2021;134(2):283-344.

Newcomb W, Lincourt A, Hope W, Schmelzer T, Sing R, Kercher K, et al. Prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of local anesthetic and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for postoperative pain management after laparoscopic surgery. The American Surgeon. 2007;73(6):618-24.

Chander R, Liddle D, Kaur B, Varghese M. Wound infiltration with plain bupivacaine as compared with bupivacaine fentanyl mixture for postoperative pain relief after abdominal surgery. Anesthesia Essays and Researches. 2011;5(2):142-6.

Luque Oliveros M, Morilla Romero de la Osa R. Bupivacaine infiltration for acute postoperative pain management after cardiac surgery. Nursing in Critical Care. 2022;27(2):223-32.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-14

How to Cite

AHMAD , A., ARIF , A., ATAULLAH , A., MUHAMMAD , F., & KHAN , M. (2024). INTRAOPERATIVE LOCAL BUPIVACAINE WOUND INFILTRATION VERSUS TRADITIONAL SYSTEMATIC ANALGESIA: A COMPARISON IN TERM OF POST-OPERATIVE PAIN. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2024(1), 1281. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1281

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>