Comparative Outcome of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade II/III Hemorrhoids
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.1824Keywords:
Hemorrhoids, Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty, Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy, Operative Time, Postoperative Pain, Hospital Stay, Randomized Controlled TrialAbstract
Hemorrhoids are a prevalent anorectal condition with significant morbidity when symptomatic. Conventional hemorrhoidectomy remains the gold standard for grade II/III hemorrhoids but is associated with notable postoperative discomfort and extended hospital stays. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative with potentially better outcomes, though limited evidence exists in the local Pakistani population. Objective: To compare mean operative time, postoperative pain, and hospital stay between laser hemorrhoidoplasty and conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in patients with grade II/III hemorrhoids. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Gulab Devi Hospital, Lahore, from January to March 2025. A total of 100 patients with symptomatic grade II/III hemorrhoids were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling and randomized equally into two groups: Group A underwent conventional open hemorrhoidectomy, and Group B received laser hemorrhoidoplasty. Key outcomes measured included operative time (in minutes), pain at one week post-operatively (VAS score), and hospital stay (in hours). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0, and independent t-tests were applied with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of the study participants was 42.6 ± 11.3 years. Male patients constituted 62% of the sample. The LHP group had significantly reduced mean operative time (14.8 ± 3.2 min vs. 30.2 ± 4.1 min, p < 0.001), lower postoperative pain scores (3.7 ± 0.7 vs. 6.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001), and shorter hospital stays (8.1 ± 2.0 hrs vs. 36.4 ± 6.3 hrs, p < 0.001) compared to the conventional group. These differences remained significant across stratified analyses for hemorrhoid grade, comorbidities, and lifestyle factors. Conclusion: Laser hemorrhoidoplasty is superior to conventional hemorrhoidectomy in terms of operative efficiency, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalization. These findings advocate for the adoption of LHP as a first-line surgical intervention for grade II/III hemorrhoids in the Pakistani healthcare setting.
Downloads
References
José MMB. Initial experience of anorectal surgery with laser technique. EC Gastroenterol Dig Syst. 2020;7:1–11.
Lohsiriwat V. Treatment of hemorrhoids: a coloproctologist's view. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(31):9245–52. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9245
Sun Z, Migaly J. Review of hemorrhoid disease: presentation and management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29(1):22–9. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1568144
Fontem RF, Eyvazzadeh D. Internal Hemorrhoid. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 [cited 2025 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537182/
Sandler RS, Peery AF. Rethinking what we know about hemorrhoids. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(1):8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2018.03.020
Lee JM, Kim NK. Essential anatomy of the anorectum for colorectal surgeons focuses on the gross anatomy and histologic findings. Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):59–71. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.12.15
Lohsiriwat V. Hemorrhoids: from basic pathophysiology to clinical management. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(17):2009–17. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i17.2009
Longchamp G, Liot E, Meyer J, Toso C, Buchs NC, Ris F. Non-excisional laser therapies for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review of the literature. Lasers Med Sci. 2021;36(3):485–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03142-8
Lie H, Caesarini EF, Purnama AA, et al. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty for hemorrhoidal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lasers Med Sci. 2022;37:3621–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-022-03643-8
Dekker L, Bak MTJ, Bemelman WA, Felt-Bersma RJF, Han-Geurts IJM. Hemorrhoidectomy versus rubber band ligation in grade III hemorrhoidal disease: a large retrospective cohort study with long-term follow-up. Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):146–52. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.01011.0144
Long Q, Wen Y, Li J. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with non-Doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation for the treatment of grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a single centre retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023;23:293. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02933-x
Yahya WN, Refaat DO, AbdElhady WA, Elsayed WA. Comparison between laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure and conventional open surgical hemorrhoidectomy. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2022;86(1):112–6. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2022.210781
Wee I., Koo C., Seow‐En I., Ng Y., Lin W., & Tan E. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Coloproctology 2023;39(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00598.0085
Hossain M., Bhuiyan M., Nahid S., Anwar S., Khan H., & Nipa S.. Comparative study of short-term outcome between laser hemorrhoidoplasty and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. Iahs Medical Journal 2023; 5(2): 15-19. https://doi.org/10.3329/iahsmj.v5i2.66822
Poškus T., Danys D., Makūnaitė G., Mainelis A., Mikalauskas S., Poškus E.et al.. Results of the double-masked randomized controlled trial comparing laser hemorrhoidoplasty with sutured mucopexy and excisional hemorrhoidectomy. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2020;35(3):481-490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03460-6
Chaudhary D., Tekam V., Mishra S., & Singh P. Comparative study between conventional hemorrhoidectomy and electrothermal bipolar vessel sealer for grade IV hemorrhoids. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences 2022;13(9):238-243. https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v13i9.44804
Gallo G., Grossi U., Tanna G., Santoro G., Paola G., Clerico G.et al.. Short-term outcomes of polycarbophil and propionibacterium acnes lysate gel after open hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2020;9(12):3996. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123996
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Hasant Ul Hassan, Khalil Ahmed, Hamail Khanum, Muhammad Arslan, Qaim Din, Asad Javed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.