COMPARISON BETWEEN ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CONGENITAL HEART DISEASES

Authors

  • F KALSOOM Department of Radiology Chaudhary Pervez Ellahi Institute of Cardiology (CPEIC) Multan, Pakistan
  • U ZAFAR Department of Radiology Chaudhary Pervez Ellahi Institute of Cardiology (CPEIC) Multan, Pakistan
  • K MUSHTAQ Department of Radiology Chaudhary Pervez Ellahi Institute of Cardiology (CPEIC) Multan, Pakistan
  • S TARIQ Department of Radiology Chaudhary Pervez Ellahi Institute of Cardiology (CPEIC) Multan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.786

Keywords:

Congenital Heart Disease, Echocardiography, Computed Tomography, Diagnosis

Abstract

Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for appropriate management and intervention. Echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography (CT) are commonly used for diagnosing CHD, yet their diagnostic reliability in a specific clinical setting requires evaluation. The objective of the study was to assess the diagnostic reliability of echocardiography and cardiac computed tomography (CT) for congenital heart disease (CHD) at Jinnah Hospital in Lahore. A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Radiology, Chaudhary Pervez Ellahi Institute of Cardiology, from January 2022 to December 2022. One hundred patients suspected of congenital cardiac disorders were enrolled, spanning various age groups. Data were collected retrospectively, including procedure notes, CT scan results, echocardiograms, and demographic information. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data, with median and percentiles calculated using SPSS. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of the 100 patients included in the study, 69 were men, and 31 were women, with ages ranging from a few days to eighteen years. Two categories of malformations were identified: intracardiac and extracardiac. Using surgical and conventional angiography results as the gold standard, 544 anomalies were confirmed and analysed, including 46 extracardiac and 196 intracardiac findings. Echocardiography demonstrated an overall diagnostic accuracy of 96.86%, while cardiac CT exhibited a diagnostic accuracy of 98.27% for cardiac congenital abnormalities. Based on the results, the cardiac computed tomography (CT) provides superior visualization of extracardiac abnormalities, with a diagnostic accuracy of 99.02%. In contrast, echocardiography remains the preferred modality for detecting intracardiac anomalies, boasting a diagnostic accuracy of 99.31%. The complementary use of echocardiography and cardiac CT enhances the assessment and evaluation of congenital heart diseases, facilitating surgical planning and intervention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ottaviani G, Buja LM. Congenital heart disease: pathology, natural history, and interventions. Cardiovascular pathology: Elsevier; 2022. p. 223-64.

Daubert MA, Tailor T, James O, Shaw LJ, Douglas PS, Koweek L. Multimodality cardiac imaging in the 21st century: evolution, advances and future opportunities for innovation. The British Journal of Radiology. 2021;94(1117):20200780.

Bell LT, MSRS R. Matters of the Heart: Radiography, CT, MRI, and Sonography in Cardiovascular Imaging.

Sun HY. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects: echocardiography. Translational paediatrics. 2021;10(8):2210.

Abdullah M, Hussain I, Nawaz A, Umer US, Sohail Z, Safi A, et al. Comparison of Cardiac Computed Tomography and Echocardiography for Diagnosing Congenital Heart Diseases. Pakistan Heart Journal. 2023;56(1):12-6.

Mozumdar N, Rowland J, Pan S, Rajagopal H, Geiger MK, Srivastava S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal echocardiography in congenital heart disease. Journal Of The American Society Of Echocardiography. 2020;33(11):1384-90.

Moscatelli S, Leo I, Bianco F, Surkova E, Pezel T, Donald NA, et al. The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Congenital Heart Disease and Infective Endocarditis Patients. Diagnostics. 2023;13(24):3638.

Clemente A, Seitun S, Mantini C, Gentile G, Federici D, Barison A, et al. Cardiac CT angiography: Normal and pathological anatomical features—A narrative review. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. 2020;10(6):1918.

Ali SA, Amin DH, Khattab RT. Intermodality agreement between TTE and low kVp ECG-gated MDCTA in diagnosis of complex CHD in pediatrics. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2020;51:1-11.

Njem JM, Edwin F, Tettey M. Comparison of preoperative trans-thoracic echocardiography with intraoperative findings in patients with congenital heart disease undergoing surgery: a prospective observational study. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2021;16:1-6.

Bu G, Miao Y, Bin J, Deng S, Liu T, Jiang H, et al. Comparison of 128-slice low-dose prospective ECG-gated CT scanning and trans-thoracic echocardiography for the diagnosis of complex congenital heart disease. PloS one. 2016;11(10):e0165617.

Puchalski MD, Lui GK, Miller-Hance WC, Brook MM, Young LT, Bhat A, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic: examination in children and all patients with congenital heart disease: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2019;32(2):173-215.

Mei M, Nie J, Yang ZS, Sun HW, Wang H, Kang XM. Comparison of echocardiography and 64‐slice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease in children. Journal of cellular biochemistry. 2019;120(3):3969-77.

Li A, Peng Z, Zhang C. Comparison of echocardiography and 64-multislice spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pediatric congenital heart disease. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research. 2017;23:2258.

Malik AA, Ahmad F, Amir S, Asgher J, Farooq K. Agreement between 64-slice multidetector CT angiography and transthoracic echocardiography in detection of extracardiac findings of congenital heart disease. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019;29(10):923-7.

Meyers BA, Zhang J, Nyce J, Loke Y-H, Vlachos PP. Enhanced echocardiographic assessment of intracardiac flow in congenital heart disease. Plos one. 2024;19(3):e0300709.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-07

How to Cite

KALSOOM , F., ZAFAR , U., MUSHTAQ , K., & TARIQ , S. (2023). COMPARISON BETWEEN ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY AND CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF CONGENITAL HEART DISEASES. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2023(1). https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.786

Most read articles by the same author(s)