POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS ENCOUNTERED BY THE STUDENTS DURING CANINE SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Authors

  • AA FAROOQ Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • MA JAVID Department of Bio-Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • S MURTAZA Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • MH LASHARI Department of Zoology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
  • MH SHAH Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • MU SALEEM Department of Bio-Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • MA BASIT Department of Bio-Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • M ASIF Institute of Continuing and Extension Education, University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • MY WAQAS Department of Physiology & Biochemistry, Cholistan University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
  • MS AKHTAR Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
  • E AHMAD Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • T AHMAD Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • HB RASHEED Department of Veterinary Surgery, University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • S NASREEN Department of Zoology, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan.
  • M ARSHAD Department of Zoology, University of Sargodha, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.591

Keywords:

Bitch, Dog, Surgical procedure, Post-surgical complications, Student performance.

Abstract

A retrospective study was conducted on analysis of procedures performed in small animal operation theatre at the Department of clinical sciences, Faculty of veterinary sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan, from 2009 to 2016. During this study period, 800 surgical complications were noted. The most frequent consequences seen were wound infection (21.25%), wound dehiscence (18.75%), septicemia (15.25%), and haemorrhage (15%). A slipped ligature, edema, myiasis, intestinal obstruction, and mortality were among the other problems. Laparotomy, Cystotomy, Gastrotomy, and Entrotomy had higher complication rates. Through questionnaire interviews with students, it was discovered that septic surgical procedures, inadequate use of surgical tools, and animals with low nutritional and health status were some of the factors that contributed to a high frequency of problems. The use of systemic antibiotics was necessary to treat the surgical site as an open wound to manage the post-operative problems. Recommendations are made to stop the emergence of post-operative problems when students are practicing surgery on dogs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chhabra S, Chhabra N, Kaur A, and Gupta N. (2017). Wound healing concepts in clinical practice of OMFS. Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 16, 403-423.

Fawcus S, and Moodley J. (2013). Postpartum haemorhage associated with cesarean section and cesarean hysterectomy. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 27(2), 233-249.

Hughes, M. J., Harrison, E., & Paterson-Brown, S. (2013). Post-operative antibiotics after appendectomy and post-operative abscess development: a retrospective analysis. Surgical infections, 14(1), 56-61.

Jawaid M, Masood Z, Iqbal SA. (2006). Post-operative complications in a general surgical ward of a teaching hospital. Pak J Med Sci. 22:171–175.

Knights CB, Mateus A, and Baines SJ. (2012). Current British veterinary attitudes to using perioperative antimicrobials in minor animal surgery. Veterinary Record, 170(25), 646-646.

Lin F, Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, Li Y, Whitelock K, Morley N, and Marshall AP. (2019). Preventing surgical site infections: Facilitators and barriers to nurses’ adherence to clinical practice guidelines qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(9-10), 1643-1652.

Misha G, Chelkeba L, and Melaku T. (2021). Bacterial profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of isolates among patients diagnosed with surgical site infection at a tertiary teaching hospital in Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials, 20, 1-10.

Mohammed A, Adeshina GO, and Ibrahim YK. (2013). Incidence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from wound infections in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Tropical journal of pharmaceutical research, 12(4), 617-621.

Monstrey SJ, Govaers K, Lejuste P, Lepelletier D, and de Oliveira PR. (2023). Evaluation of the role of povidone-iodine in the prevention of surgical site infections. Surgery Open Science.

Natalie L, Semchyshyn N. (2009). Dermatological surgical complications. Online Available from: http://www.emedicine.com/derm/ topic829.htm

Nelson, LL. (2011). Surgical site infections in small animal surgery. Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice, 41(5), 1041-1056.

Pinto BB, Chew M, Buse GL, and Walder B. (2019). The concept of peri-operative medicine to prevent major adverse events and improve outcome in surgical patients: a narrative review. European Journal of Anaesthesiology EJA, 36(12), 889-903.

Saunders RS, Fernandes-Taylor S, Rathouz PJ, Saha S, Wiseman JT, Havlena J. (2014). Outpatient followup versus 30-day readmission among general and vascular surgery patients: a case for redesigning transitional care. Surgery. 156(4):949–58. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.041

Scalise A, Calamita R, Tartaglione C, Pierangeli M, Bolletta E, Gioacchini M, and Di Benedetto G. (2016). Improving wound healing and preventing surgical site complications of closed surgical incisions: a possible role of incisional negative pressure wound therapy. A systematic review of the literature. International wound journal, 13(6), 1260-1281.

Scotton W, Cobb R, Pang L, Nixon I, Joshi A, Jeannon JP, and Simo R. (2012). Post-operative wound infection in salvage laryngectomy: does antibiotic prophylaxis have an impact?. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 269, 2415-2422.

Sousa AFL, Bim LL, Hermann PRS, Fronteira I, Andrade D. (2020). Late postoperative complications in surgical patients: an integrative review. Rev Bras Enferm. 73(5):01-07.

Windahl U, Bengtsson B, Nyman AK, and Holst BS. (2015). The distribution of pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among canine surgical wound infections in Sweden in relation to different risk factors. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 57(1), 1-10. Yao X, Zhu G, Zhu P, Ma J, Chen W, Liu Z, and Kong T. (2020). Omniphobic ZIF‐8@ Hydrogel membrane by microfluidic‐emulsion‐templating method for wound healing. Advanced

Downloads

Published

2023-12-15

How to Cite

FAROOQ , A., JAVID , M., MURTAZA , S., LASHARI , M., SHAH , M., SALEEM , M., BASIT , M., ASIF , M., WAQAS , M., AKHTAR, M., AHMAD , E., AHMAD , T., RASHEED , H., NASREEN , S., & ARSHAD, M. (2023). POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS ENCOUNTERED BY THE STUDENTS DURING CANINE SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2023(1), 591. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.591

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>