APPLICATIONS OF EPIGENETICS IN FORENSIC INVESTIGATIONS: A BRIEF REVIEW

Authors

  • RA Ullah Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore Pakistan
  • A Ali Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore Pakistan
  • N Hussain Centre for Applied Molecular Biology, University the Punjab Lahore, Lahore Pakistan
  • A Malik Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, The University of Lahore, Lahore Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2021i1.58

Keywords:

epigenetics, forensic, methylation, chromatin, acetylation

Abstract

Forensic science is a discipline that has the capacity to be merged with every promise to offer a solution to a criminal investigation to help the legal system. Epigenetics is a branch of genetics that deals with the study of environmental interaction with the genome. The emerging field of forensic epigenetics has a variety of applications in criminal investigations. It provides an addictive tool to solve criminal activity-related issues. In this review, we have showcased the brief use of epigenetics to sort out forensic-related issues and help the legal system. We have briefly taken a snapshot of genetics, epigenetics, and application of epigenetics in forensic science that how it could offer solutions to queries of forensic nature. Also, potential future developments in the field and their probable impact have been anticipated. It has many potential applications which are still to be explored. It complements forensic science at many potential levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
3465

References

Anway, M. D., Cupp, A. S., Uzumcu, M., & Skinner, M. K. (2005). Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. science, 308(5727), 1466-1469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1108190

Bird, A. (2007). Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature, 447(7143), 396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05913

Breitling, L. P., Yang, R., Korn, B., Burwinkel, B., & Brenner, H. (2011). Tobacco-smoking-related differential DNA methylation: 27K discovery and replication. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 88(4), 450-457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.03.003

Chong, S., & Whitelaw, E. (2004). Epigenetic germline inheritance. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 14(6), 692-696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2004.09.001

Du, Q., Zhu, G., Fu, G., Zhang, X., Fu, L., Li, S., & Cong, B. (2015). A genome-wide scan of DNA methylation markers for distinguishing monozygotic twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 18(6), 670-679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2015.73

Eckhardt, F., Lewin, J., Cortese, R., Rakyan, V. K., Attwood, J., Burger, M., ... & Beck, S. (2006). DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nature genetics, 38(12), 1378-1385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1909

EDU, (2015). Crime Scene Investigator, Archived from the original on 6 September 2015.

Eurostat (2017). Tobacco consumption statistics. explained/index.php/Tobacco_consumption_statistics.http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics.

Fraga, M. F., Ballestar, E., Paz, M. F., Ropero, S., Setien, F., Ballestar, M. L., ... & Esteller, M. (2005). Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(30), 10604-10609. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0500398102

Freire-Aradas, A., Phillips, C., & Lareu, M. V. (2017). Forensic individual age estimation with DNA: from initial approaches to methylation tests. Forensic Science Review, 29(2).

Frumkin, D., Wasserstrom, A., Budowle, B., & Davidson, A. (2011). DNA methylation-based forensic tissue identification. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 5(5), 517-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.12.001

Heyn, H., Moran, S., Hernando-Herraez, I., Sayols, S., Gomez, A., Sandoval, J., & Esteller, M. (2013). DNA methylation contributes to natural human variation. Genome research, 23(9), 1363-1372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.154187.112

Holtkötter, H., Beyer, V., Schwender, K., Glaub, A., Johann, K. S., Schürenkamp, M., ... & EUROFORGEN-NoE Consortium. (2017). Independent validation of body fluid-specific CpG markers and construction of a robust multiplex assay. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 29, 261-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.05.002

Hong, E. J., West, A. E., & Greenberg, M. E. (2005). Transcriptional control of cognitive development. Current opinion in neurobiology, 15(1), 21-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2005.01.002

Horvath, S. (2013). DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biology, 14(10), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115

Houseman, E. A., Accomando, W. P., Koestler, D. C., Christensen, B. C., Marsit, C. J., Nelson, H. H., ... & Kelsey, K. T. (2012). DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinformatics, 13(1), 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-86

Huang, J., Okuka, M., Lu, W., Tsibris, J. C., McLean, M. P., Keefe, D. L., & Liu, L. (2013). Telomere shortening and DNA damage of embryonic stem cells induced by cigarette smoke. Reproductive Toxicology, 35, 89-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.07.003

Jeggo, P. A., & Holliday, R. (1986). Azacytidine-induced reactivation of a DNA repair gene in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 6(8), 2944-2949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.6.8.2944-2949.1986

Jobling, M. A., & Gill, P. (2004). Encoded evidence: DNA in forensic analysis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(10), 739-751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1455

Kader, F. and Ghai, M. (2015). DNA methylation and application in forensic sciences. Forensic Sci. Int. 249:pp.255-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.01.037

Kaminsky, Z., & Petronis, A. (2009). Methylation SNaPshot: a method for the quantification of site-specific DNA methylation levels. In DNA Methylation (pp. 241-255). Humana Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-522-0_18

Kayser, M. (2015). Forensic DNA phenotyping: predicting human appearance from crime scene material for investigative purposes. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 18, 33-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.02.003

Kayser, M., & De Knijff, P. (2011). Improving human forensics through advances in genetics, genomics and molecular biology. Nature Reviews Genetics, 12(3), 179-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2952

Klose, R. J., & Bird, A. P. (2006). Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 31(2), 89-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.008

Kovatsi, L., Vidaki, A., & Fragou, D. (2015). Syndercombe Court D. Epigenetic fingerprint. Personalised epigenetics. 1st ed. USA: Elsevier, 221-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420135-4.00008-5

Kunkel, T. A. (2004). DNA replication fidelity. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279:16895–16898. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.R400006200

Laird, C. D., Pleasant, N. D., Clark, A. D., Sneeden, J. L., Hassan, K. A., Manley, N. C., ... & Stöger, R. (2004). Hairpin-bisulfite PCR: assessing epigenetic methylation patterns on complementary strands of individual DNA molecules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(1), 204-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2536758100

Lee, H. Y., Lee, S. D., & Shin, K. J. (2016). Forensic DNA methylation profiling from evidence material for investigative leads. BMB Reports, 49(7), 359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5483/BMBRep.2016.49.7.070

Li, C., Zhao, S., Zhang, N., Zhang, S., & Hou, Y. (2013). Differences of DNA methylation profiles between monozygotic twins’ blood samples. Molecular Biology Reports, 40(9), 5275-5280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-013-2627-y

Lindenbergh, A., de Pagter, M., Ramdayal, G., Visser, M., Zubakov, D., Kayser, M., & Sijen, T. (2012). A multiplex (m) RNA-profiling system for the forensic identification of body fluids and contact traces. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 6(5), 565-577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.01.009

Linnér, R. K., Marioni, R. E., Rietveld, C. A., Simpkin, A. J., Davies, N. M., Watanabe, K., ... & Benjamin, D. J. (2017). An epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis of educational attainment. Molecular Psychiatry, 22(12), 1680-1690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.210

Madi, T., Balamurugan, K., Bombardi, R., Duncan, G., & McCord, B. (2012). The determination of tissue‐specific DNA methylation patterns in forensic biofluids using bisulfite modification and pyrosequencing. Electrophoresis, 33(12), 1736-1745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201100711

Naito, E., Dewa, K., Yamanouchi, H., Takagi, S., & Kominami, R. (1993). Sex determination using the hypomethylation of a human macro-satellite DXZ4 in female cells. Nucleic acids research, 21(10), 2533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/21.10.2533

Olkhov‐Mitsel, E., & Bapat, B. (2012). Strategies for discovery and validation of methylated and hydroxymethylated DNA biomarkers. Cancer medicine, 1(2), 237-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.22

Phillips, C. (2015). Forensic genetic analysis of bio-geographical ancestry. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 18, 49-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.05.012

Riggs, A. D., Suzuki, H., & Bourgeois, S. (1970). lac repressor-operator interaction: I. Equilibrium studies. Journal of Molecular Biology, 48(1), 67-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2836(70)90219-6

Rogakou, E. P., Boon, C., Redon, C., & Bonner, W. M. (1999). Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. Journal of Cell Biology, 146(5), 905-916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.146.5.905

Russo, V. E., Martienssen, R. A., & Riggs, A. D. (1996). Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Satta, R., Maloku, E., Zhubi, A., Pibiri, F., Hajos, M., Costa, E., & Guidotti, A. (2008). Nicotine decreases DNA methyltransferase 1 expression and glutamic acid decarboxylase 67 promoter methylation in GABAergic interneurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(42), 16356-16361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808699105

Sauer, E., Reinke, A. K., & Courts, C. (2016). Differentiation of five body fluids from forensic samples by expression analysis of four microRNAs using quantitative PCR. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 22, 89-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.01.018

Sijen, T. (2015). Molecular approaches for forensic cell type identification: on mRNA, miRNA, DNA methylation and microbial markers. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 18, 21-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.11.015

Silva, A. J., Ward, K., & White, R. (1993). Mosaic methylation in clonal tissue. Developmental Biology, 156(2), 391-398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1993.1086

Song, F., Mahmood, S., Ghosh, S., Liang, P., Smiraglia, D. J., Nagase, H., & Held, W. A. (2009). Tissue specific differentially methylated regions (TDMR): Changes in DNA methylation during development. Genomics, 93(2), 130-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.09.003

Van Dongen, J., Nivard, M. G., Willemsen, G., Hottenga, J. J., Helmer, Q., Dolan, C. V., ... & Boomsma, D. I. (2016). Genetic and environmental influences interact with age and sex in shaping the human methylome. Nature Communications, 7(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11115

Varley, K. E., Gertz, J., Bowling, K. M., Parker, S. L., Reddy, T. E., Pauli-Behn, F., ... & Myers, R. M. (2013). Dynamic DNA methylation across diverse human cell lines and tissues. Genome Research, 23(3), 555-567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.147942.112

Vidaki, A., & Kayser, M. (2017). From forensic epigenetics to forensic epigenomics: broadening DNA investigative intelligence. Genome biology, 18(1), 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1373-1

Vidaki, A., & Kayser, M. (2018). Recent progress, methods and perspectives in forensic epigenetics. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 37, 180-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.08.008

Vidaki, A., Daniel, B., & Court, D. S. (2013). Forensic DNA methylation profiling—potential opportunities and challenges. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 7(5), 499-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.004

Vidaki, A., Giangasparo, F., & Syndercombe Court, D. (2016). Discovery of potential DNA methylation markers for forensic tissue identification using bisulphite pyrosequencing. Electrophoresis, 37(21), 2767-2779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.201600261

Vidaki, A., López, C. D., Carnero-Montoro, E., Ralf, A., Ward, K., Spector, T., & Kayser, M. (2017). Epigenetic discrimination of identical twins from blood under the forensic scenario. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 31, 67-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.07.014

Waddington, C.H. (1957). (Allen & Unwin, London, 1957). The Strategy of the Genes. George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.

Weaver, I. C., Cervoni, N., Champagne, F. A., D'Alessio, A. C., Sharma, S., Seckl, J. R., ... & Meaney, M. J. (2004). Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 7(8), 847-854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1276

Weber-Lehmann, J., Schilling, E., Gradl, G., Richter, D. C., Wiehler, J., & Rolf, B. (2014). Finding the needle in the haystack: differentiating “identical” twins in paternity testing and forensics by ultra-deep next generation sequencing. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 9, 42-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.10.015

Wong, A. H., Gottesman, I. I., & Petronis, A. (2005). Phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms: the epigenetic perspective. Human Molecular Genetics, 14(suppl_1), R11-R18.

Wong, A. H., Gottesman, I. I., & Petronis, A. (2005). Phenotypic differences in genetically identical organisms: the epigenetic perspective. Human molecular genetics, 14(suppl_1), R11-R18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddi116

Yet, I., Tsai, P. C., Castillo-Fernandez, J. E., Carnero-Montoro, E., & Bell, J. T. (2016). Genetic and environmental impacts on DNA methylation levels in twins. Epigenomics, 8(1), 105-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/epi.15.90

Zbieć-Piekarska, R., Spólnicka, M., Kupiec, T., Parys-Proszek, A., Makowska, Ż., Pałeczka, A., ... & Branicki, W. (2015). Development of a forensically useful age prediction method based on DNA methylation analysis. Forensic Science International: Genetics, 17, 173-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.05.001

Zhang, B., Zhou, Y., Lin, N., Lowdon, R. F., Hong, C., Nagarajan, R. P., ... & Wang, T. (2013). Functional DNA methylation differences between tissues, cell types, and across individuals discovered using the M&M algorithm. Genome Research, 23(9), 1522-1540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.156539.113

Zilbauer, M., Rayner, T. F., Clark, C., Coffey, A. J., Joyce, C. J., Palta, P., ... & Smith, K. G. (2013). Genome-wide methylation analyses of primary human leukocyte subsets identifies functionally important cell-type–specific hypomethylated regions. Blood, 122(25), e52-e60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-05-503201

Zolotarenko, A. D., Chekalin, E. V., & Bruskin, S. A. (2019). Modern Molecular Genetic Methods for Age Estimation in Forensics. Russian Journal of Genetics, 55(12), 1460-1471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795419120147

Downloads

Published

2021-03-12

How to Cite

1.
Ullah R, Ali A, Hussain N, Malik A. APPLICATIONS OF EPIGENETICS IN FORENSIC INVESTIGATIONS: A BRIEF REVIEW. Biol Clin Sci Res J [Internet]. 2021 Mar. 12 [cited 2026 Jul. 20];2021(1). Available from: https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/58

Issue

Section

Review Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.