ESTIMATING THE PHOTOSYSTEM’S EFFICIENCY, ANTIOXIDANTS ACTIVITY AND PLANT WATER RELATIONS OF TOMATO UNDER WATER DEFICIT CONDITIONS

Authors

  • R GHAFFAR Department of Horticultural Sciences, FA& ES, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan
  • MR SHAHEEN Department of Horticultural Sciences, FA& ES, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan
  • R HUSSAIN Department of Horticultural Sciences, FA& ES, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan
  • S ANJUM Institute of Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, 54590, Pakistan
  • S RASHID Institute of Horticultural Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
  • MA SAEED Department of Horticultural Sciences, FA& ES, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan
  • A SHABBIR Department of Horticultural Sciences, FA& ES, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan
  • MU AMJAD Department of Horticultural Sciences, FA& ES, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.636

Keywords:

Tomato, Photosystem II, Antioxidants, Plant water relations, Drought

Abstract

Due to physiological repercussions, the tomato crop has decreased productivity caused by drought throughout its entire life cycle. The tomato harvest has exceeded expectations due to a worldwide water resource limitation. The objective of subjecting the tomato cultivars Flanto and Sahel, to a self-imposed drought was to investigate the interrelationships among biochemical, physiological, enzymatic, and water-related factors. Five varying levels of moisture strongly impacted all plant attributes: 100%, 80%, 60%, 40%, and 20% when subjected to drought stress. The lack of water resulted in notable improvements in some metrics. Some examples of these traits include linear electron flow (LEF), photosynthetic efficiency (PSE), inward light dissipation ratio (qP), catalase activity (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase activity (APX), and leaf water potential (LEWP). Consider, for example, the intriguing discoveries concerning photosystem II, non-photochemical quenching, chlorophyll levels, leaf osmotic potential, and leaf turgor potential.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, A., Rehman, A., and Javed, M. (2021). Exploring the potential of in vitro tissue culture in breeding programs of legume and pulse crops: utilization and present condition. Bulletin of Biological and Allied Sciences Research 2021, 36-36.

ALI, S. (2022). Response of rice under salt stress. Biological and Agricultural Sciences Research Journal 2022, 6-6.

Calcagno, A., Rivas, M., and Castrillo, M. (2011). Structural, Physiological and Metabolic Integrated Responses of Two Tomato ('Solanum lycopersicum'L.) Cultivars During Leaf Rehydration. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5, 695-701.

Čaňová, I., Ďurkovič, J., Hladká, D., and Lukáčik, I. (2012). Changes in stomatal characteristics and photochemical efficiency during leaf development in six species of Sorbus. Photosynthetica 50, 635-640.

Colom, M., and Vazzana, C. (2003). Photosynthesis and PSII functionality of drought-resistant and drought-sensitive weeping lovegrass plants. Environmental and experimental botany 49, 135-144.

de Azevedo Neto, A. D., Prisco, J. T., Enéas-Filho, J., de Abreu, C. E. B., and Gomes-Filho, E. (2006). Effect of salt stress on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany 56, 87-94.

Fahad, S., Bajwa, A. A., Nazir, U., Anjum, S. A., Farooq, A., Zohaib, A., Sadia, S., Nasim, W., Adkins, S., and Saud, S. (2017). Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Frontiers in plant science, 1147.

Farooq, M., Basra, S., Wahid, A., Cheema, Z., Cheema, M., and Khaliq, A. (2008). Physiological role of exogenously applied glycinebetaine to improve drought tolerance in fine grain aromatic rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 194, 325-333.

Fatima, S., CHEEMA, K., Shafiq, M., Manzoor, M., Ali, Q., Haider, M., and Shahid, M. (2023). The genome-wide bioinformatics analysis of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase (acs), 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase (aco) and ethylene overproducer 1 (eto1) gene family of fragaria vesca (woodland strawberry). Bulletin of Biological and Allied Sciences Research 2023, 38-38.

Flexas, J., Baron, M., Bota, J., Ducruet, J.-M., Galle, A., Galmes, J., Jiménez, M., Pou, A., Ribas-Carbó, M., and Sajnani, C. (2009). Photosynthesis limitations during water stress acclimation and recovery in the drought-adapted Vitis hybrid Richter-110 (V. berlandieri× V. rupestris). Journal of experimental Botany 60, 2361-2377.

Guidi, L., Lo Piccolo, E., and Landi, M. (2019). Chlorophyll fluorescence, photoinhibition and abiotic stress: does it make any difference the fact to be a C3 or C4 species? Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 174.

Haider, M., Sami, A., Mazhar, H., Akram, J., NISA, B., Umar, M., and Meeran, M. (2023). Exploring morphological traits variation in Gomphrena globosa: A multivariate analysis. Biological and Agricultural Sciences Research Journal 2023, 21-21.

Hussain, H. A., Hussain, S., Khaliq, A., Ashraf, U., Anjum, S. A., Men, S., and Wang, L. (2018). Chilling and drought stresses in crop plants: implications, cross talk, and potential management opportunities. Frontiers in plant science 9, 393.

Hussain, R., Ayyub, C. M., Shaheen, M. R., Rashid, S., Nafees, M., Ali, S., Butt, M., Ali, M., Maqsood, A., and Fiaz, S. (2021). Regulation of osmotic balance and increased antioxidant activities under heat stress in Abelmoschus esculentus L. triggered by exogenous proline application. Agronomy 11, 685.

Lata, C., and Prasad, M. (2011). Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. Journal of experimental botany 62, 4731-4748.

Latif, F., Ullah, F., Mehmood, S., Khattak, A., Khan, A. U., Khan, S., and Husain, I. (2016). Effects of salicylic acid on growth and accumulation of phenolics in Zea mays L. under drought stress. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B—Soil & Plant Science 66, 325-332.

López-Serrano, L., Canet-Sanchis, G., Vuletin Selak, G., Penella, C., San Bautista, A., López-Galarza, S., and Calatayud, Á. (2019). Pepper rootstock and scion physiological responses under drought stress. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 38.

Massacci, A., Nabiev, S., Pietrosanti, L., Nematov, S., Chernikova, T., Thor, K., and Leipner, J. (2008). Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to the onset of drought stress under field conditions studied by gas-exchange analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant physiology and biochemistry 46, 189-195.

Moussa, H. R., and Abdel-Aziz, S. M. (2008). Comparative response of drought tolerant and drought sensitive maize genotypes to water stress. Australian Journal of Crop Science 1, 31-36.

Nazir, A., Shaheen, M. R., Ayyub, C. M., Hussain, R., Sarwer, N., Imran, M., Aurangzaib, M., Nawaz, M., Ali Khan, M. F., and Jawad, Y. (2017). Exploring the better genetic options from indigenous material to cultivate tomato under high temperature regime. Journal of Applied Botany & Food Quality 90.

Nikolaeva, M., Maevskaya, S., Shugaev, A., and Bukhov, N. (2010). Effect of drought on chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves of three wheat cultivars varying in productivity. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 57, 87-95.

Noctor, G., Veljovic-Jovanovic, S., and Foyer, C. H. (2000). Peroxide processing in photosynthesis: antioxidant coupling and redox signalling. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 355, 1465-1475.

Ozgur, R., Uzilday, B., Sekmen, A. H., and Turkan, I. (2013). Reactive oxygen species regulation and antioxidant defence in halophytes. Functional Plant Biology 40, 832-847.

Panda, S., Singha, L., and Khan, M. (2003). Does aluminium phytotoxicity induce oxidative stress in greengram (Vigna radiata). Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology 29, 77-86.

Rasheed, M., and Malik, A. (2022). Mechanism of drought stress tolerance in wheat. Bulletin of Biological and Allied Sciences Research 2022, 23-23.

Robin, S., Pathan, M., Courtois, B., Lafitte, R., Carandang, S., Lanceras, S., Amante, M., Nguyen, H. T., and Li, Z. (2003). Mapping osmotic adjustment in an advanced back-cross inbred population of rice. Theoretical and applied genetics 107, 1288-1296.

Sánchez-Rodríguez, E., Rubio-Wilhelmi, M. M., Cervilla, L. M., Blasco, B., Rios, J. J., Rosales, M. A., Romero, L., and Ruiz, J. M. (2010). Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant science 178, 30-40.

Schreiber, U. (2004). Pulse-amplitude-modulation (PAM) fluorometry and saturation pulse method: an overview. Chlorophyll a fluorescence: a signature of photosynthesis, 279-319.

Shao, H. B., Liang, Z. S., Shao, M. A., and Wang, B. C. (2005). Changes of anti-oxidative enzymes and membrane peroxidation for soil water deficits among 10 wheat genotypes at seedling stage. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 42, 107-113.

Sharma, P., Jha, A. B., Dubey, R. S., and Pessarakli, M. (2012). Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful conditions. Journal of botany 2012.

Siddique, M., Hamid, A., and Islam, M. (2000). Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 41.

Subrahmanyam, D., Subash, N., Haris, A., and Sikka, A. (2006). Influence of water stress on leaf photosynthetic characteristics in wheat cultivars differing in their susceptibility to drought. Photosynthetica 44, 125-129.

Tiwari, S., Lata, C., Chauhan, P. S., and Nautiyal, C. S. (2016). Pseudomonas putida attunes morphophysiological, biochemical and molecular responses in Cicer arietinum L. during drought stress and recovery. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 99, 108-117.

Tuteja, N., Ahmad, P., Panda, B. B., and Tuteja, R. (2009). Genotoxic stress in plants: shedding light on DNA damage, repair and DNA repair helicases. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 681, 134-149.

Ullah, I., Ullah, A., Rehman, S., Ullah, S., Ullah, H., Haqqni, S., Amir, M., Gul, F., and Bashir, K. (2023). Prevalence and risk factors of helicobacter pylori infection among individuals with tobacco consumption habits in district Peshawar: a cross-sectional study. Bulletin of Biological and Allied Sciences Research 2023, 42-42.

Wang, W., Chen, Q., Hussain, S., Mei, J., Dong, H., Peng, S., Huang, J., Cui, K., and Nie, L. (2016). Pre-sowing seed treatments in direct-seeded early rice: consequences for emergence, seedling growth and associated metabolic events under chilling stress. Scientific reports 6, 19637.

Yu, Q., and Rengel, Z. (1999). Drought and salinity differentially influence activities of superoxide dismutases in narrow-leafed lupins. Plant Science 142, 1-11.

Zhou, R., Yu, X., Kjær, K. H., Rosenqvist, E., Ottosen, C.-O., and Wu, Z. (2015). Screening and validation of tomato genotypes under heat stress using Fv/Fm to reveal the physiological mechanism of heat tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany 118, 1-11.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

GHAFFAR, R., SHAHEEN, M., HUSSAIN, R., ANJUM, S., RASHID, S., SAEED, M., SHABBIR, A., & AMJAD, M. (2023). ESTIMATING THE PHOTOSYSTEM’S EFFICIENCY, ANTIOXIDANTS ACTIVITY AND PLANT WATER RELATIONS OF TOMATO UNDER WATER DEFICIT CONDITIONS. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2023(1), 636. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.636

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3