Qudsia’s Sneaky Knot: A Practical Modification for Surgical Knot-Tying in Constrained Operative Fields

Authors

  • Qudsia Nawaz Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CMH, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Fatima Shah Muhammad Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CMH, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Shazia Shakeel Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CMH, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Uzma Gul Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CMH, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Samia Rehman Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CMH, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Ayesha Tanveer Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CMH, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Neha Tanveer Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, CMH, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v7i5.2283

Keywords:

Clinical Competence, Internship and Residency, Patient Safety, Suture Techniques, Surgical Procedures, Operative

Abstract

Surgical knot-tying is a core operative skill that influences wound security, hemostasis, and patient safety. In clinical practice, conventional knot-tying may become difficult when suture ends are relatively distant or operative access is limited. Objective: To introduce and evaluate Qudsia’s Sneaky Knot, a modified knot-tying technique designed for situations in which conventional approximation of suture ends is technically challenging. Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted among 22 Obstetrics and Gynecology residents in a surgical training setting at CMH hospital, Lahore, from June 2023 to June 2024. Participants were introduced to Qudsia’s Sneaky Knot and then assessed using a structured five-point Likert-scale questionnaire. The questionnaire evaluated perceived surgical utility, practicality, ease of learning, safety and confidence, reproducibility, and suitability for inclusion in surgical skills training. Agreement was defined as a Likert score of ≥4. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including mean, standard deviation, frequency, and percentage. Results: All 22 residents completed the survey. Mean domain scores ranged from 4.55 to 4.80 out of 5, indicating consistently high acceptance of the technique. Ease of learning received the highest mean score (4.80 ± 0.39), with 100% participant agreement. Safety and confidence scored 4.69 ± 0.46, while practicality and efficiency scored 4.63 ± 0.51. All participants reported willingness to recommend the technique and to use it independently in future surgical procedures. Conclusion: Qudsia’s Sneaky Knot showed high perceived acceptability, ease of learning, practicality, and educational value among Obstetrics and Gynecology residents. The technique may be useful in constrained surgical situations where conventional knot-tying is difficult. Further validation through simulation-based assessment and comparative operative studies is recommended before wider integration into surgical training curricula.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
110

References

1. Singh R, Hawkins W. Sutures, ligatures and knots. Surgery (Oxford). 2023;41(2):71-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpsur.2022.11.007

2. Wong YR, McGrouther DA. Biomechanics of surgical knot security: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2023;109(3):481-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000298

3. Bushong EE, Janis JE. Knot security 101: a comprehensive practical review to optimal knot configuration, pulling direction, throw count, and tail length. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12(8):e6047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006047

4. Johanns P, Baek C, Grandgeorge P, Guerid S, Chester SA, Reis PM. The strength of surgical knots involves a critical interplay between friction and elastoplasticity. Sci Adv. 2023;9(23):eadg8861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adg8861

5. Romeo A, Fujimoto C, Cipullo I, Giarola M, Benedetto C, Kondo W, et al. Effect of diameter and type of suture on knot and loop security. J Clin Med. 2023;12(19):6418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196418

6. Wang M, Xiang X, Wang Y, Ren Y, Yang L, Zhang Y. Comparison of tensile properties and knot security of surgical sutures: an in vitro mechanical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;80(7):1215-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.03.014

7. Taysi AE, Taysi NM, Sismanoglu S. Does knot configuration improve tensile characteristics of monofilament suture materials? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;81(1):72-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.09.006

8. Dasci S, Schrem H, Oldhafer F, Beetz O, Kleine-Döpke D, Vondran F, et al. Learning surgical knot tying and suturing technique-effects of different forms of training in a controlled randomized trial with dental students. GMS J Med Educ. 2023;40(4):Doc48.

9. Seifert LB, Schnurr B, Stefanescu MC, Sader R, Ruesseler M, Sterz J. Comparing video-based versions of Halsted’s “see one, do one” and Peyton’s “4-step approach” for teaching surgical skills: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02105-5

10. Hoopes S, Pham T, Lindo FM, Antosh DD. Home surgical skill training resources for obstetrics and gynecology trainees during a pandemic. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(1):56-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003931

11. Niaz K, Mahboob U, Masood D, Maqbool A. Effectiveness of video-based teaching in surgery residents: a randomized control trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(10):2373-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.7856

12. Zimmerman E, Pierson R, Takacs P, Chervenak FA, Bornstein E, Pinas A, et al. EBCOG position statement-simulation-based training for obstetrics and gynaecology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;258:457-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.12.002

13. Ebrahim S, Kinoo SM, Naidoo M, Van Wyk JM. The use of household items to support online surgical knot-tying skills training: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05549-1

14. Nagaraj MB, Campbell KK, Rege RV, Mihalic AP, Scott DJ. At-home medical student simulation: achieving knot-tying proficiency using video-based assessment. Glob Surg Educ. 2022;1(1):4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44186-022-00007-2

15. Kumins NH, Qin VL, Driscoll EC, Morrow KL, Kashyap VS, Ning AY, et al. Computer-based video training is effective in teaching basic surgical skills to novices without faculty involvement using a self-directed, sequential and incremental program. Am J Surg. 2021;221(4):780-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.011

16. Handaya AY, Fauzi AR, Andrew J, Hanif AS, Tjendra KR, Aditya AFK. Effectiveness of tutorial videos combined with online classes in surgical knotting course during COVID-19 pandemic: a cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;69:102751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102751

17. Youssef SC, Aydin A, Canning A, Khan N, Ahmed K, Dasgupta P. Learning surgical skills through video-based education: a systematic review. Surg Innov. 2023;30(2):220-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506221120146

18. Feeley A, Feeley I, Healy E, Sheehan E, Hehir DJ. Acquisition of surgical skills in medical students via telementoring: a randomized controlled trial. J Surg Res. 2022;270:471-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.10.007

19. Nathan A, Fricker M, Georgi M, Patel S, Hang MK, Asif A, et al. Virtual interactive surgical skills classroom: a parallel-group, non-inferiority, adjudicator-blinded, randomized controlled trial (VIRTUAL). J Surg Educ. 2022;79(3):791-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.11.004

20. Co M, Chung PH, Chu KM. Online teaching of basic surgical skills to medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a case-control study. Surg Today. 2021;51(8):1404-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-021-02229-1

21. Chase T, Shah DK, Parry JP, Bhagavath B, Lindheim SR, Petrozza JC, et al. Surgical simulation supplements reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship training. F S Rep. 2020;1(2):154-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfre.2020.06.002

22. Bresler L, Perez M, Hubert J, Henry JP, Perrenot C. Residency training in robotic surgery: the role of simulation. J Visc Surg. 2020;157(3 Suppl 2):S123-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.03.006

23. Thomaschewski M, Vonthein R, Keck T, Laubert T, Benecke C; NOVICE Study Group. Laparoscopic simulation training improves operating room performance of surgical residents: a multicenter randomized trial (NOVICE). Int J Surg. 2025;111(4):2923-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002304

24. Aftab R, Ali SM, Ali A, Shahid N, Arja SB, Ahmed M, et al. Transfer of laparoscopic skills from box trainer simulation to real life: a bi-center study in Pakistan. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025;16:2003-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S556187

25. Huffman E, Anton N, Martin J, Timsina L, Dearing W, Breece B, et al. Optimizing assessment of surgical knot tying skill. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(6):1577-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.05.004

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

1.
Nawaz Q, Muhammad FS, Shakeel S, Gul U, Rehman S, Tanveer A, et al. Qudsia’s Sneaky Knot: A Practical Modification for Surgical Knot-Tying in Constrained Operative Fields. Biol Clin Sci Res J [Internet]. 2026 May 31 [cited 2026 Jun. 28];7(5):5-8. Available from: https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/2283

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.