Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy

Authors

  • Zuhaib Zafar Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Harris Hassan Qureshi Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Syed Arslan Shehzad Shah Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Syeda Zoha Abbas Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Najam Us Saqib Hassan Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Altaf Hussain Hashmi Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan
  • Adeeb Ul Hassan Rizvi Department of Urology, Sindh Institute of Urology & Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i2.2251

Keywords:

Renal Cell Carcinoma, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, Operative time, Blood loss, hospital stay

Abstract

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is an established minimally invasive surgical approach for localized renal cell carcinoma. Evaluation of perioperative outcomes is essential to determine its safety and feasibility in routine clinical practice. Objective:  To determine the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy among renal tumor patients. Methods: This descriptive case series included 63 patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma with renal tumor size <12 cm who were planned for laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation from 11-Dec-2018 to 11-June-2019. Patients aged 20–70 years were included after routine preoperative history, clinical examination, and baseline assessment. The study was conducted at the study hospital during the defined study period. Data were collected regarding age, gender, body mass index, tumor side, and tumor stage. Perioperative outcomes, including operative time and estimated intraoperative blood loss, were recorded during surgery, while postoperative hospital stay was documented after surgery. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Independent-samples t-test was applied where appropriate, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.. Results: Mean age of patients was 50.94+11.99 years. There were 42 (66.7%) male patients and only 21 (33.3%) female patients. There were 29 (46%) patients who were having stage T1 RCC and only 34 (54%) patients were having T2 RCC. Mean operative time of patients was 171.59+33.91 minutes. Mean intra-operative blood loss was 139.29+48.15 mL. Mean hospital stay of patients was 2.94+0.53 days. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that surgical outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy are very acceptable among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC), with mean operative time 171.59+33.91 minutes, mean blood loss 139.29+48.15 mL was and mean hospital stay 2.94+0.53 days.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
310

References

1. Hsieh JJ, Purdue MP, Signoretti S, Swanton C, Albiges L, Schmidinger M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.9

2. Alaghehbandan R, Siadat F, Trpkov K. What’s new in the WHO 2022 classification of kidney tumours? Pathologica. 2023;115(1):8-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32074/1591-951X-818

3. Vikram R, Beland MD, Blaufox MD, Moreno CC, Gore JL, Harvin HJ, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria renal cell carcinoma staging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(5):518-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.01.021

4. Bhandari A, Ibrahim M, Sharma C, Liong R, Gustafson S, Prior M. CT-based radiomics for differentiating renal tumours: a systematic review. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46(5):2052-2063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02832-9

5. Heng DYC, Xie W, Regan MM, Harshman LC, Bjarnason GA, Vaishampayan UN, et al. External validation and comparison with other models of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(2):141-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70559-4

6. Wang L, Li KP, Yin S, Yang L, Zhu PY. Oncologic and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for the treatment of renal tumor (>7 cm): a systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes. World J Surg Oncol. 2023;21(1):35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-02916-y

7. Li KP, Chen SY, Wang CY, Yang L. Comparison between minimally invasive partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2023;109(6):1769-1782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000397

8. Mentessidou A, Djendov F, Long AM, Jackson C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for paediatric renal tumors with focus on Wilms’ tumor. Ann Surg. 2024;279(5):755-764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006154

9. Mirza KM, Taxy JB, Antic T. Radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: its contemporary role related to histologic type, tumor size, and nodal status: a retrospective study. Am J Clin Pathol. 2016;145(6):837-842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqw059

10. Acar C, Bilen CY, Bayazit Y, Aslan G, Koni A, Basok E, et al. Quality of life survey following laparoscopic and open radical nephrectomy. Urol J. 2014;11(6):1944-1950.

11. Shen H, Tu R, Li W, He G, Huang W, Qin Z, et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for treating small renal cell carcinoma: case report and literature review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18(10):e23912. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.23912

12. Deane LA, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell cancer: radical and total. BJU Int. 2007;99(5 Pt B):1251-1257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06832.x

13. Nguyen HH, Do TT, Hoang L, Do NS, Van TC, Nguyen DM. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: indications and long-term outcome of a cohort study in Vietnam. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2022;10(B):2052-2059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2022.9925

14. Haehn DA, Kahn AE, Parikh KA, Bajalia EM, Ball CT, Thiel DD. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal mass in patients on dialysis or with renal transplant in place compared to normal controls. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021;31(2):189-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0383

15. Hsu CK, Lin HY, Young WL, Wu SY. Outcomes and predictors of postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a retrospective analysis. BMC Urol. 2025;25(1):294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01978-2

16. Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, Heidorn C, McDougall EM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol. 2000;164(4):1153-1159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67131-5

Downloads

Published

2025-02-28

How to Cite

1.
Zafar Z, Qureshi HH, Shah SAS, Abbas SZ, Hassan NUS, Hashmi AH, et al. Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy. Biol Clin Sci Res J [Internet]. 2025 Feb. 28 [cited 2026 Jun. 28];6(2):223-6. Available from: https://bcsrj.com/ojs/index.php/bcsrj/article/view/2251

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Categories

Similar Articles

<< < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.