Short Course and Conventional Antimicrobial Duration in Mild and Moderate Intra-abdominal Infection Among Admitted Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.2006Keywords:
antimicrobial duration, abdominal infections, success rate, adverse effectsAbstract
Prolonged antibiotic therapy for community-acquired intra-abdominal infections (CA-IAIs) has traditionally been prescribed for seven to ten days, despite growing evidence that shorter regimens may be equally effective after adequate source control. Optimizing antibiotic duration is critical to improving antimicrobial stewardship, minimizing drug resistance, and reducing hospital resource utilization. Objective: To compare clinical efficacy, safety, and resource utilisation of a protocol-driven four-day short-course versus conventional seven-to-ten-day antimicrobial therapy in adults hospitalised with mild or moderate community-acquired intra-abdominal infection. Methods: This single-centre, prospective, parallel-group study was conducted between 1 July 2024 and 31 March 2025. Adults ≥ 18 years admitted with a radiologically confirmed mild or moderate community-acquired intra-abdominal infection (IAI)—including perforated appendicitis, localized diverticulitis, cholecystitis, or contained hollow-viscus perforation—were screened within 24 h of source-control intervention (laparoscopic/open surgery or image-guided percutaneous drainage). Results: Baseline inflammatory markers were comparable: mean white‐cell count was 12.8 ± 2.8 × 10^9/L in the conventional arm and 11.8 ± 3.3 × 10^9/L in the short‐course arm (p = 0.367), while mean C-reactive protein levels were 48.9 ± 19.6 mg/L versus 47.2 ± 20.3 mg/L (p = 0.741). Length of stay averaged 12.7 ± 2.8 days for conventional therapy and 9.42 ± 3.95 days for short‐course therapy, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.638). Clinical success rates were 100% (58/58) in the conventional group and 95% (40/42) in the short‐course group (p = 0.16). Recurrence occurred in 2% (1/58) of conventional patients and none of the short‐course patients (p = 0.323), while 30-day mortality was 5% in both arms (3/58 vs. 2/42; p = 0.57). Adverse events were reported in 9% (5/58) of the conventional group and 19% (8/42) of the short‐course group (p = 0.372). Conclusion: A fixed four-day regimen after adequate source control produced the same clinical success, mortality, and recurrence as conventional eight-day therapy.
Downloads
References
Sartelli M, Tascini C, Coccolini F, Dellai F, Ansaloni L, Antonelli M, et al. Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the Italian council for the optimization of antimicrobial use. World J Emerg Surg. 2024;19(1):23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-024-00551-w
Sartelli M, Coccolini F, Kluger Y, Agastra E, Abu-Zidan FM, Abbas AES, et al. WSES/GAIS/SIS-E/WSIS/AAST global clinical pathways for patients with intra-abdominal infections. World J Emerg Surg. 2021;16(1):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-021-00387-8
Hoffmann C, Zak M, Avery L, Brown J. Treatment modalities and antimicrobial stewardship initiatives in the management of intra-abdominal infections. Antibiotics (Basel). 2016;5(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics5010011
Mumtaz H, Ejaz MK, Tayyab M, Vohra LI, Sapkota S, Hasan M, et al. APACHE scoring as an indicator of mortality rate in ICU patients: a cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023;85(3):416–421. https://doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000000264
Montravers P, Tubach F, Lescot T, Veber B, Esposito-Farèse M, Seguin P, et al. Short-course antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients treated for postoperative intra-abdominal infection: the DURAPOP randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(3):300–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5088-x
Ra JH, Rattan R, Patel NJ, Bhattacharya B, Butts CA, Gupta S, et al. Duration of antimicrobial treatment for complicated intra-abdominal infections after definitive source control: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2023;95(4):603–612. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000003998
Bova R, Griggio G, Vallicelli C, Santandrea G, Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, et al. Source control and antibiotics in intra-abdominal infections. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024;13(8):776. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13080776
Sawyer RG, Claridge JA, Nathens AB, Rotstein OD, Duane TM, Evans HL, et al. Trial of short-course antimicrobial therapy for intraabdominal infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(21):1996–2005. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1411162
Montravers P, Tubach F, Lescot T, Veber B, Esposito-Farèse M, Seguin P, et al. Short-course antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients treated for postoperative intra-abdominal infection: the DURAPOP randomised clinical trial. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(3):300–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5088-x
Ra JH, Rattan R, Patel NJ, Bhattacharya B, Butts CA, Gupta S, et al. Duration of antimicrobial treatment for complicated intra-abdominal infections after definitive source control: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.
Tian B, Agnoletti V, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Bravi F, Sartelli M, et al. Management of intra-abdominal infections: the role of procalcitonin. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(9):1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091406
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syeda Mahjabeen, Farhan Zaheer, Tayram Khalid, Hafiz Yahya Iftikhar, Sehrish Alam, Ramsha Ali

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

