Diagnostic Accuracy of HRCT Temporal Bone in Evaluation of Cholesteatoma, Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard

Authors

  • Maryam Saeed Department of Radiology, Ch Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology, Multan, Pakistan
  • Nazahat Pasha Department of Radiology, Ch Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology, Multan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1851

Keywords:

Cholesteatoma, High-resolution computed tomography, HRCT, Temporal bone, Histopathology, Diagnostic accuracy, Middle ear disease

Abstract

Cholesteatoma is a destructive lesion of the temporal bone that may lead to significant complications if left untreated. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) plays a pivotal role in its preoperative evaluation due to its superior spatial resolution. However, histopathology remains the gold standard for diagnosis. Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of HRCT temporal bone in detecting cholesteatoma, using histopathological findings as the reference standard. Methods: This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted over six months (May–October 2024) at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, CPEIC Multan. A total of 147 patients aged 2–60 years with clinical suspicion of cholesteatoma were included through non-probability consecutive sampling. All patients underwent HRCT followed by surgical exploration and histopathological evaluation. Diagnostic accuracy metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy of HRCT, were calculated using 2x2 contingency tables. Stratified analyses were performed by age, gender, symptom duration, and laterality. Results: Of the 147 patients, 92 (62.6%) were confirmed to have cholesteatoma on histopathology, while 88 (59.9%) were diagnosed via HRCT. HRCT demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.2%, specificity of 90.9%, PPV of 94.3%, NPV of 84.7%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 90.1%. The highest diagnostic performance was observed in the 21–40 years age group. Diagnostic accuracy remained consistent across gender and laterality, with slightly higher accuracy noted for patients with symptom duration of 6–12 months. Conclusion: HRCT temporal bone is a highly accurate and reliable imaging modality for diagnosing cholesteatoma and provides valuable preoperative information. However, given its limitations in detecting small or atypical lesions, histopathological confirmation remains essential. Incorporating multimodal imaging, including DWI MRI, may further enhance diagnostic precision, particularly in complex cases or recurrence surveillance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Singh P., Singh R., Rai R., Sethi S., Ahluwalia A., & Choudhary G.. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in pediatric and adult patients with unsafe chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) and its surgical correlation. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 2020; 9(8):4067. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_455_20

HumtsoeE.. Evaluation of temporal bone cholesteatoma and the correlation between high-resolution computed tomography and surgical findings. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700225

Jat H., Daswani S., Sheldon M., & Patel N.. High-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of temporal bone pathology. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies 2021;5(9). https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v5i9.2189

Boruah D., Sharma B., Sanyal S., Malakar N., D D., Prakash A.et al.. Role of high-resolution computed tomography in the evaluation of suppurative diseases of the middle ear and mastoids and their complications with surgical correlation. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2016;5(17):850-858. https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2016/197

J N., M C., Udayakumar C., & G S.. Role and utility of HRCT and MRI in detection and evaluation of cholesteatoma. International Journal of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging 2019;2(2):119-122. https://doi.org/10.33545/26644436.2019.v2.i2b.77

Ho K., Huang T., Tsai S., Wang H., Chien C., & Chang N.. Surgical treatment of external auditory canal cholesteatoma - ten years of clinical experience. The Journal of International Advanced Otology 2017;13(1):9-13. https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2017.2342

Zaman S., Rangankar V., Krishnarjun M., Shah V., Gowtham K., & Pawar R.. Temporal bone cholesteatoma: typical findings and evaluation of diagnostic utility on high-resolution computed tomography. Cureus 2022. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.22730

Kapoor A., Kapoor A., Nimkar N., Soni H., Ojha V., & Biswas R.. High-resolution computed tomography and intraoperative correlation in cholesteatoma: enhancing preoperative evaluation and surgical management. Cureus 2023. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.44333

Pathak M., Gautam M., Acharya A., Khanal B., Pathak Y., & Tiwari S.. An exploratory study of high-resolution computed tomography of the temporal bone in chronic otitis media. Nepalese Journal of Radiology 2022;12(2):7-13. https://doi.org/10.3126/njr.v12i2.54583

Fan X., Ding C., & Liu Z.. Localization evaluation of primary middle ear cholesteatoma with fusion of turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted imaging and high-resolution computed tomography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 2022. https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000001389

Beig S., Sharma S., & Khalid M.. Revisiting correlation between pre-operative high-resolution computed tomography and operative findings in attico-antral disease. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2018;71(S2):1351-1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-018-1419-z

Nasir Z., Sarif M., & Nor K.. Surgical management of labyrinthine fistula as a complication of cholesteatoma. Egyptian Journal of Ear Nose Throat and Allied Sciences 2021;22(22):1-5. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejentas.2021.28975.1203

Zaman S., Rangankar V., Krishnarjun M., Kalekar T., Shah V., Pawar R.et al.. Readout-segmented echoplanar (resolve) diffusion-weighted imaging on 3 T MRI in detection of cholesteatoma—our experience. Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 2023;34(01):16-24. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1776054

Felici F., Scemama U., Bendahan D., Lavieille J., Moulin G., Chagnaud C.et al.. Improved assessment of middle ear recurrent cholesteatomas using a fusion of conventional CT and non-epi-dwimri. American Journal of Neuroradiology 2019. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a6141

Çakan D. and UşaklıoğluS.. Comparison of high-resolution computed tomography and surgical findings in patients with temporal bone cholesteatoma. The Turkish Journal of Ear, Nose, and Throat 2022;0(0):0-0. https://doi.org/10.26650/tr-ent.2022.1151579

Doshi H., SOLNAKI K., Bathla M., Kansara A., Chavda N., & Gajjar R.. Role of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) temporal bone in different pathologies. Indian Journal of Applied Basic Medical Sciences 2020;22/B(35). https://doi.org/10.26860/ijabms.2020.22/b.35.10

Xun M., Liu X., Sha Y., Zhang X., & Liu J.. The diagnostic utility of diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging and high‐resolution computed tomography for cholesteatoma: a meta‐analysis. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology 2023;8(3):627-635. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1032

Shemesh S., Luckman J., Marom T., Kraus O., & Tamir S.. Are Hounsfield unit measurements of bony absorption changes in cholesteatoma helpful?. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 2021;26(03):e414-e421. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736580.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Saeed, M. ., & Pasha, N. . (2025). Diagnostic Accuracy of HRCT Temporal Bone in Evaluation of Cholesteatoma, Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 6(6), 214–217. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1851

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles