Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Scan Abdomen in Differentiating Peritoneal Tuberculosis from Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Taking Omental Biopsy as Gold Standard

Authors

  • Asfa Anjum Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chaudhary Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology Multan, Pakistan
  • Nazahat Pasha Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Chaudhary Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology Multan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.1777

Keywords:

Peritoneal Tuberculosis, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, CT Abdomen, Omental Biopsy, Diagnostic Accuracy

Abstract

Peritoneal tuberculosis (PTB) and peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) often present with overlapping clinical and radiological features, making differentiation challenging. In tuberculosis-endemic regions such as Pakistan, accurate non-invasive diagnosis is vital to guide appropriate treatment and avoid mismanagement.  Objective: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in differentiating peritoneal tuberculosis from peritoneal carcinomatosis using omental biopsy as the gold standard. Methods: This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted at the Department of Radiology, Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi Institute of Cardiology (CPEIC), Multan, over a period of six months from April 2024 to September 2024. A total of 149 patients aged 30–65 years with suspected peritoneal disease were included. All participants underwent CECT followed by omental biopsy. CT findings were compared with histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall diagnostic accuracy were calculated using SPSS version 25. Results: CT scan showed a sensitivity of 90.4%, specificity of 80.3%, PPV of 85.2%, NPV of 86.9%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 85.9%. Further stratified analysis revealed consistent diagnostic performance across age, gender, and residential status, supporting the modality’s reliability in diverse subpopulations. Conclusion: CT scan is a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic tool for distinguishing PTB from PC, especially in TB-endemic settings like Pakistan. While omental biopsy remains the definitive diagnostic method, CT can play a pivotal role in guiding clinical decisions and reducing diagnostic delays.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2023. Geneva: WHO; 2023.

Khurana A, Malik A, Wadhwa N, Khurana U. Peritoneal tuberculosis or carcinomatosis? A diagnostic dilemma. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2020;30(4):456–462. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijri.IJRI_177_20

Chaudhry A, Ayub S, Ali A. Peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking malignancy: A diagnostic challenge. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(12):2878–2882. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.2296

Bilal M, Ahmed A, Shahid A. Role of histopathology in the diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(2):134–138. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.1166

Bhosale P, Patnana M, Viswanathan C. The imaging of peritoneal tuberculosis. AbdomRadiol (NY). 2021;46(7):3017–3028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02750-2

Qureshi K, Fatima S, Iqbal R. CT characteristics of peritoneal TB vs peritoneal carcinomatosis. Pak J Radiol. 2022;32(1):23–29.

Kumar S, Mehta P, Yadav R. Diagnostic performance of CT abdomen in differentiating PTB from PC. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(7):TC01–TC05.

Singh A, Goenka AH, Gupta A. Imaging features in differentiating peritoneal tuberculosis from peritoneal carcinomatosis. Radiol Med. 2021;126(10):1300–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01386-4

Rasheed S, Zafar N, Fatima N. Misdiagnosis of carcinomatosis as TB: A review of diagnostic pitfalls. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020;30(6):616–620. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2020.06.616

Afridi G, Ahmad M, Saleem M. Clinical profile and diagnostic delays in peritoneal TB. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci. 2022;18(2):154–158.

Zafar A, Bukhari M, Nazir Z. Cost-effectiveness of CT vs laparoscopy for suspected abdominal TB. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2021;15(3):1124–1128.

Ahmed T, Mehmood A, Khaliq T. Diagnostic scoring systems in CT for abdominal TB. Cureus. 2023;15(1):e34099. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.34099

Nawaz H, Rasheed S, Akhtar S. Accuracy of CT abdomen in diagnosing peritoneal TB: A comparative study. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2020;9(3):123–128.

Aziz S, Awan MS, Jamal S. CT abdomen as a diagnostic tool in TB-endemic areas. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2022;34(1):89–94.

Singh A, Goenka AH, Gupta A. Imaging features in differentiating peritoneal tuberculosis from peritoneal carcinomatosis. Radiol Med. 2021;126(10):1300–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01386-4

Qureshi K, Fatima S, Iqbal R. Diagnostic role of CT scan in distinguishing peritoneal tuberculosis from peritoneal carcinomatosis. Pak J Radiol. 2022;32(1):23–29.

Ahmed T, Mehmood A, Khaliq T. Diagnostic performance of CT scan in peritoneal diseases compared to histopathology. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e35982. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35982

Goenka AH, Bhosale PR, Shanbhogue AKP. Radiological challenges in differentiating abdominal TB from malignancy: A systematic review. AbdomRadiol (NY). 2021;46(6):2392–2401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02779-3

Ebrahimian A, Shakibafard A, Ghadimi F. Evaluation of CT scan findings in abdominal TB and PC patients: A comparative Iranian study. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2020;34:149. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.34.149

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Anjum, A. ., & Pasha, N. . (2025). Diagnostic Accuracy of CT Scan Abdomen in Differentiating Peritoneal Tuberculosis from Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Taking Omental Biopsy as Gold Standard. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 6(5), 213–216. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.1777

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles