Efficacy of Vaginal Prostaglandin E2 Versus Oxytocin for Induction of Labour in Patients with Premature Rupture of Membranes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.1720Keywords:
Prelabour rupture of membranes, PROM, prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, labor induction, cesarean section, randomized controlled trialAbstract
Prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM) at term is a common obstetric complication that necessitates timely labor induction to reduce maternal and neonatal morbidity. While both oxytocin and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) are used for induction, their comparative efficacy remains under-investigated in low-resource settings such as Pakistan. Objective: To compare the efficacy of vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in patients with term PROM in terms of timely vaginal delivery and reduction in cesarean rates. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted over six months from April 2024 to September 2024 at the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Ibn-e-Siena Hospital, Multan. A total of 120 women with singleton term pregnancies (37–42 weeks) presenting with PROM of <6 hours duration were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous oxytocin (Group A, n = 60) or vaginal PGE2 (Group B, n = 60). Primary outcome was vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included induction-to-delivery interval, cesarean section rate, and failure of induction. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 23, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Results: Vaginal delivery within 24 hours was achieved in 73.3% of women in the PGE2 group versus 50.0% in the oxytocin group (p = 0.010). The mean induction-to-delivery interval was significantly shorter in the PGE2 group (7.2 ± 2.1 hours) compared to the oxytocin group (9.4 ± 2.3 hours; p < 0.001). Cesarean section rates were also significantly lower in the PGE2 group (20.0%) versus the oxytocin group (40.0%; p = 0.020). No serious adverse events were reported in either group. Conclusion: Vaginal PGE2 is more effective than intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in term PROM, with a higher likelihood of timely vaginal delivery and reduced cesarean risk. These findings support the inclusion of PGE2 in national labor induction guidelines, especially in high-volume, resource-limited healthcare settings in Pakistan.
Downloads
References
Ashraf S, Sultana H, Qadir SY, Khalid M. Maternal outcomes of expectant management vs induction of labour in PROM. Prof Med J. 2020;27(08):1565-9.
Idrisa A, Pius S, Bukar M. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in premature rupture of membranes. Trop J ObstetGynaecol. 2019;36(1):15-20.
Padayachee L, Kale M, Mannerfeldt J, Metcalfe A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour in term PROM: a systematic review. J ObstetGynaecol Can. 2020;42(12):1525-31.
Chiossi G, Di Tommaso M, Monari F, et al. Risk of neonatal sepsis in an expectantly managed cohort of late preterm PROM. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprod Biol. 2021;261:1-6.
Gulersen M, Zottola C, Li X, et al. Chorioamnionitis after PROM in nulliparas undergoing labor induction: PGE2 vs. oxytocin. J Perinat Med. 2021;49(9):1058-63.
Bostancı E, Kilicci C, Ozkaya E, et al. Continuous vs intermittent oxytocin for induction of labor: a randomized study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(4):651-6.
Zhao L, Lin Y, Jiang TT, et al. Vaginal delivery among women induced with dinoprostone: a retrospective study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(10):1721-7.
Li K, Zheng X, Xu C, et al. Prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert vs oxytocin for labor induction: a meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):145.
Akhter S, Wahed A, Shami N. Comparison of oxytocin and PGE2 for induction of labour in PROM patients. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2012;6(1):5-8.
Ali SS, Aslam L, Memon F, et al. IV oxytocin vs vaginal PGE2 for inducing labour in PROM. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(10):985-7.
Shah N, Jafarey SN. Safe motherhood in Pakistan. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;148(Suppl 1):S31-5.
Euser AG, Rossen J, Meijer WF, et al. Vaginal PGE2 vs oxytocin for labor induction in term PROM: a Dutch cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(7):875-82.
Qureshi RN, Soomro T, Jafarey SN, et al. Rising rates of cesarean section in tertiary hospitals of Pakistan: a cause for concern. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(12):2897-901.
Ali SS, Aslam L, Memon F, Imran S, Inayat A, Naseem H. Intravenous oxytocin vs vaginal prostaglandin E2 for inducing labour in prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(10):985–7.
Akhter S, Wahed A, Shami N. Comparison of oxytocin and prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour in patients with pre-labour rupture of membrane. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2019;13(1):5–8.
Gulersen M, Zottola C, Li X, Krantz D, DiSturco M, Bornstein E. Chorioamnionitis after PROM in nulliparas undergoing labor induction: prostaglandin E2 vs. oxytocin. J Perinat Med. 2021;49(9):1058–63.
Zhao L, Lin Y, Jiang TT, Wang L, Li M, Wang Y, et al. Vaginal delivery among women who underwent labor induction with vaginal dinoprostone (PGE2) insert: a retrospective study of 1656 women in China. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(10):1721–7.
Li K, Zheng X, Xu C, Shen Y, He X. Prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert versus oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: a meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):145.
Euser AG, Rossen J, Meijer WF, et al. Vaginal PGE2 vs oxytocin for labor induction in term PROM: a Dutch cohort study. Acta ObstetGynecol Scand. 2020;99(7):875–82.
Bostancı E, Kilicci C, Ozkaya E, Abide Yayla C, Eroglu M. Continuous oxytocin versus intermittent oxytocin for induction of labor: a randomized study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(4):651–6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zainab Noor, Shagufta Liaqat, Misbah Khurshid, Asif Ali

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.