Sonographic Correlation of Fetal Foot Length as a Reliable Parameter for Estimation of Gestational Age in the Second and Third Trimester of Pregnancy

Kiran Shahid; Nasir Khan; Hafiz Muhammad Ahsan Ayub

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v6i1.1645

Authors

Kiran Shahid Department of Radiology, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Nasir Khan Department of Radiology, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Hafiz Muhammad Ahsan Ayub Niazi Medical College, Sargodha, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i1.1645

Keywords:

Abdominal Circumference; Biparietal Diameter; Femur Length; Foot; Gestational Age; Pregnancy Trimester

Abstract

Accurate estimation of gestational age is essential for appropriate antenatal care and fetal assessment. Standard ultrasonographic parameters may be affected in certain clinical situations, so that fetal foot length may serve as an additional reliable biometric marker. Objective: To determine the correlation between fetal foot length and standard biometric parameters, including femur length, biparietal diameter, and abdominal circumference, for the estimation of gestational age during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Radiology, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, from 20 March 2023 to 19 September 2023. A total of 120 pregnant women in the second or third trimester undergoing ultrasonographic assessment were enrolled. Pregnancies complicated by oligohydramnios, polyhydramnios, intrauterine growth restriction, and skeletal dysplasia were excluded. Transabdominal ultrasonography was performed for all participants. Fetal foot length was measured and compared with conventional fetal biometric parameters, including femur length, biparietal diameter, and abdominal circumference, to assess their correlation with gestational age. Data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and inferential analysis was performed using correlation testing. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Among 120 participants, the mean maternal age was 28.28±4.37 years, while the mean gestational age was 27.33±4.99 weeks. The mean fetal foot length was 47.87±11.88 mm, the mean femur length was 51.29±12.58 mm, the mean biparietal diameter was 69.09±14.05 mm, and the mean abdominal circumference was 231.73±51.77 mm. Fetal foot length showed a significant positive correlation with gestational age and with other fetal biometric parameters (p<0.0001). The correlation coefficient of fetal foot length was 0.867 with femur length, 0.850 with biparietal diameter, and 0.743 with abdominal circumference, all of which were statistically significant (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Fetal foot length demonstrated a strong positive correlation with gestational age and standard fetal biometric parameters in the second and third trimesters. It may be considered a reliable supplementary parameter for gestational age estimation in routine obstetric ultrasonography.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

4

References

1. Paulsen CB, Nielsen BB, Msemo OA, Møller SL, Ekmann JR, Theander TG, et al. Anthropometric measurements can identify small-for-gestational-age newborns: a cohort study in rural Tanzania. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19(1):120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1500-0

2. Moraitis AA, Shreeve N, Sovio U, Brocklehurst P, Heazell AEP, Thornton JG, et al. Universal third-trimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. PLoS Med. 2020;17(10):e1003190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003190

3. Majmudar DK, Vaidya CV, Sanghrajka VJ. Accuracy of foetal foot length and femur/foot length ratio in USG estimation of gestational age. Int J Contemp Med Surg Radiol. 2019;4(2):B111-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21276/ijcmsr.2019.4.2.25

4. Burgos-Artizzu XP, Coronado-Gutiérrez D, Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, Vellvé K, Eixarch E, Crispi F, et al. Analysis of maturation features in fetal brain ultrasound via artificial intelligence for the estimation of gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021;3(6):100462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100462

5. Borgohain L, George RA. Ultrasonographic correlation of fetal foot length and gestational age in the Indian population. Int J Dent Med Sci Res. 2021;3(5):1622-31.

6. Leibovitz Z, Lerman-Sagie T. Diagnostic approach to fetal microcephaly. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2018;22(6):935-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2018.06.002

7. Rubab N, Anjum MN, Ahmed M, Fatima M. Estimation of gestational age from fetal foot length measurement. Pak Biomed J. 2022;5(1):380-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i1.252

8. Ebraheem M, Malik BA, Ali QM, Gameraddin M, Gareeballah A. Accuracy of fetal foot length measurement in estimation of gestational age and fetal weight in the third trimester of pregnancy. J Health Res Rev. 2018;5(3):142-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrr.jhrr_23_18

9. Mukhia R, Mukherjee A, Sabnis A. Determination of gestational age of human fetuses from the crown-heel length, crown-rump length, foot length, and abdominal circumference. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2016;7:8164-6.

10. Thennarasi K, Nagasutha D. Fetal foot length as a biometric parameter in estimation of gestational age. Int J Sci Stud. 2021;8(10):158-62.

11. Shrivastava A, Laddad M. Comparison of foetal kidney length with foetal biometric parameters (biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, head circumference and femur length) in the third trimester of pregnancy. Natl J Med Res. 2023;13(4):111-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55489/njmr.13042023980

12. Roy M, Gajbe UL, Singh BR, Thute P. Morphometric measurement of fetal femur length for the prediction of gestational age in the 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancy by ultrasonography. J Datta Meghe Inst. Med. Sci. Univ. 2017;12(3):187-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_71_17

13. Dagnew N, Tazebew A, Ayinalem A, Muche A. Measuring newborn foot length to estimate gestational age in a high-risk Northwest Ethiopian population. PLoS One. 2020;15(8):e0238169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238169

14. Srinivasa S, Manasa G, Madhu G. Foot length of newborn: its correlation with gestational age and various anthropometric parameters. Curr Pediatr Res. 2017;21(2):248-53.

15. Chikkannaiah P, Gosavi M. Accuracy of fetal measurements in estimation of gestational age. Indian J Pathol Oncol. 2016;3(1):11-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2394-6792.2016.00003.X

16. Fawziah MF, Soebagyo B, Hidayah D. Diagnostic value of newborn foot length to predict gestational age. Paediatr Indones. 2017;57(4):181-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14238/pi57.4.2017.1376

17. Tikmani SS, Roujani S, Azam SI, Yasmin H, Bano K, Jessani S, et al. Relationship between foot length and gestational age in Pakistan. Glob Pediatr Health. 2020;7:2333794X20974206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X20974206

18. Tenali ASL, Tenali RK. Study of foot length as an alternate measurement for assessment of gestational maturity in neonates. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2019;6(2):477-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20190684

19. Rakkappan I, Kuppusamy N. Newborn foot length measurement to identify high-risk neonate. Int J Sci Stud. 2016;4(2):13-9.

20. Joshi K, Marahatta S, Karki S, Tamrakar S, Shrestha N. Fetal foot length and femur/foot length ratio: significance in Nepalese context. Nepal J Radiol. 2011;1(1):15-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3126/njr.v1i1.6317

21. Malik BA, Ibrahim M, Ali Q, Yousef M, Alshammari QT, Jastaniah S. Use of foot measurements as a sonographic parameter for estimation of fetal age. Open J Med Imaging. 2017;7(4):248-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmi.2017.74023