EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT CALCIUM-SILICATE BASED MATERIALS ON FRACTURE RESISTANCE OF IMMATURE PERMANENT TEETH WITH REPLACEMENT ROOT RESORPTION AND OSTEOCLASTOGENESIS

S HABIB; S ASLAM; U FATIMA; MU REHMAN; KA MOHSIN; Z AHMAD

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1472

Authors

S HABIB Department of Demonstrator Paediatric Dentistry, Lahore Medical and Dental College Lahore, Pakistan
S ASLAM General Dentist, Lahore Medical and Dental College Lahore, Pakistan
U FATIMA Department of Demonstrator Paediatric Dentistry, Lahore Medical and Dental College Lahore, Pakistan
MU REHMAN Department of Demonstrator Operative Crown and Bridge, Lahore Medical and Dental College Lahore, Pakistan
KA MOHSIN Department of Dentistry, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan
Z AHMAD Department of Dentistry, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1472

Keywords:

Tooth Fractures Dentinogenesis Calcium Silicates Root Resorption Osteoclasts

Abstract

Immature permanent teeth with replacement root resorption pose challenges in dental treatment due to compromised structural integrity. Calcium-silicate based materials show promise in promoting dentin genesis and tissue repair, but their effects on fracture resistance in such teeth remain unclear . Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of different calcium-silicate based materials on fracture resistance and osteoclast genesis in immature permanent teeth with replacement root resorption. Methods: A prospective experimental study was conducted on 60 patients at Lahore medical and dental college, Lahore from September 2023 to March 2024. Patients were divided into three groups receiving Bio dentine, White MTA, or Bio-C Repair as part of their endodontic treatment. Fracture resistance was assessed using mechanical testing, while osteoclast genesis was evaluated histologically. Patient-reported outcomes and radiographic findings were also recorded. Results: Bio dentine exhibited the highest fracture resistance and lowest osteoclast activity, followed by White MTA and Bio-C Repair. Patients treated with Bio dentine reported lower postoperative pain levels and higher treatment satisfaction. Radiographic evaluation showed favorable periapical healing and dentin formation in all groups. Conclusion: The study concludes that Bio dentine may offer superior fracture resistance and biocompatibility compared to White MTA and Bio-C Repair in immature permanent teeth with replacement root resorption. These findings support Bio dentine’s potential as an effective therapeutic agent for enhancing the durability and functionality of compromised dental structures. Further research is needed to validate these results and optimize treatment strategies for managing such clinical scenarios.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wnuk, K., Świtalski, J., Miazga, W. et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of prophylactic sealing of pits and fissures of permanent teeth with fissure sealants - umbrella review. BMC Oral Health 23, 806 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03499-6

Zhang Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Chen Y, Zhang Q, Zou J. The clinical effects of laser preparation of tooth surfaces for fissure sealants placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):203.

Akinlotan M, Chen B, Fontanilla TM, Chen A, Fan VY. Economic evaluation of dental sealants: a systematic literature review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46:38–46.

Dlayton RL, Urquhart O, Araujo MWB. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2018;149(10):837–49.

Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Walsh T, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M, Worthington HV. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017;7:CD001830.

Erdemir, Ugur, et al. "Clinical Comparison of a Flowable Composite and Fissure Sealant: A 24-month Split-mouth, Randomized, and Controlled Study." Journal of Dentistry, vol. 42, no. 2, 2014, pp. 149-157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.015.

Piszko, Aleksandra, et al. "Brief Narrative Review on Commercial Dental Sealants—Comparison with Respect to Their Composition and Potential Modifications." Materials, vol. 16, no. 19, 2022, p. 6453, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16196453.

Nebu, P. State of the Art Enamel Remineralization Systems: The Next Frontier in Caries Management. Caries Res. 2019, 53, 284–295.

Lubojanski, A.; Dobrzynski, M.; Nowak, N.; Rewak-Soroczynska, J.; Sztyler, K.; Zakrzewski, W.; Dobrzynski, W.; Szymonowicz, M.; Rybak, Z.; Wiglusz, K.; et al. Application of Selected Nanomaterials and Ozone in Modern Clinical Dentistry. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 259.

Ahovuo-Saloranta, A.; Forss, H.; Walsh, T.; Nordblad, A.; Mäkelä, M.; Worthington, H.V. Pit and Fissure Sealants for Preventing Dental Decay in Permanent Teeth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 2017, CD001830.

Wright, J.T.; Crall, J.J.; Fontana, M.; Gillette, E.J.; Nový, B.B.; Dhar, V.; Donly, K.; Hewlett, E.R.; Quinonez, R.B.; Chaffin, J.; et al. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for the Use of Pit-and-Fissure Sealants: A Report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2016, 147, 672–682.e12.

Arumugam, P. Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Variation in Light-Curing Cycle with a Time Gap and Its Effect on Polymerization Shrinkage and Microhardness of Conventional Hydrophobic Sealants and Moisture-Tolerant Resin-Based Sealants: An in Vitro Study. Indian J. Multidiscip. Dent. 2018, 8, 13.

Arslanoğlu, Z.; Altan, H.; Kale, E.; Bılgıç, F.; Şahin, O. Nanomechanical Behaviour and Surface Roughness of New Generation Dental Fissure Sealants. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2016, 130, 388–393.

Elkwatehy, W.M.A.; Bukhari, O.M. The Efficacy of Different Sealant Modalities for Prevention of Pits and Fissures Caries: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Int. Soc. Prev. Community Dent. 2019, 9, 119.

Oglakci, B.; Arhun, N. The Shear Bond Strength of Repaired High-Viscosity Bulk-Fill Resin Composites with Different Adhesive Systems and Resin Composite Types. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2019, 33, 1584–1597

Beresescu, Liana, et al. "Comparative Assessment of Retention and Caries Protective Effectiveness of a Hydrophilic and a Conventional Sealant—A Clinical Trial." Children, vol. 9, no. 5, 2022, p. 646, https://doi.org/10.3390/children9050646.

Cheuk-Hang Ng, Toby, et al. "A Concise Review of Dental Sealants in Caries Management." Frontiers in Oral Health, vol. 4, 2023, https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2023.1180405.

Safari, Ebrahim, et al. "Effect of a Fluoride-releasing Fissure Sealant and a Conventional Fissure Sealant on Inhibition of Primary Carious Lesions with or Without Exposure to Fluoride-containing Toothpaste." Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects, vol. 13, no. 2, 2018, pp. 147-152, https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2019.023.

Nazzal H. et al. Comparison of residual salivary fluoride retention using amine fluoride toothpastes in caries-free and caries-prone children. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2016;17(3):165–169. doi: 10.1007/s40368-015-0220-x.

Yan WJ, Zheng JJ, Chen XX. Application of fluoride releasing flowable resin in pit and fissure sealant of children with early enamel caries. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018;50(5):911–914

Yan WJ, Zheng JJ, Chen XX. [Application of fluoride releasing flowable resin in pit and fissure sealant of children with early enamel caries]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Oct 18;50(5):911-914. Chinese. PMID: 30337757.