ASSESSMENT OF THE FEASIBILITY AND SAFETY OF SUPINE PER CUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY UNDER REGIONAL ANESTHESIA FOR OBESE PATIENTS WITH A BODY MASS INDEX >30

Authors

  • F KHAN Department, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar KPK, Pakistan
  • S INAMULLAH Department, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar KPK, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.945

Keywords:

Obesity, Nephrolithiasis, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL), Regional Anesthesia (RA), Supine Position

Abstract

In the realm of urology, particularly in addressing nephrolithiasis, obesity (characterized by a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 30 kg/m²) poses considerable challenges. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), traditionally conducted in the prone position, stands as the benchmark for removing kidney stones. The adoption of the supine position offers potential benefits, including enhanced respiratory function and simplified anesthetic access. This research evaluates the effectiveness, safety, and practicality of employing supine PCNL with regional anesthesia (RA) for obese individuals. Methods: The study was conducted at Urology Department, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar KPK, Pakistan in the duration from January 2023 to December, 2023, comprising 200 obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m²) who received supine PCNL under RA. The main metrics assessed were the rate of procedural success, duration of operation, and hospitalization period. Secondary metrics involved rates of complications, stone clearance, and patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25, setting the significance threshold at p < 0.05. Results: This analysis encompassed 200 participants, averaging 45.3 years old with a mean BMI of 38.7 kg/m². The success rate of the procedures stood at 95%, with operations averaging 95.8 minutes and hospital stays around 3.1 days. Complications were noted in 16.5% of cases, with 3.5% being severe. The rate of stone-free outcomes was 88%, and the average patient satisfaction was rated at 8.7 out of 10. Notably, higher BMI correlated with prolonged operation times and a higher incidence of complications. Conclusion: Supine PCNL under RA proves to be a secure, viable, and effective method for treating obese patients, yielding high success rates, manageable operation durations, and robust safety outcomes. These results advocate for the integration of supine positioning and RA in clinical settings, especially for high-risk obese patients, as they likely enhance perioperative results and patient contentment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Smith A, Averch TD, Shahrour K, Opondo D, Daels FP, Labate G, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a critical review of the complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):660-7.

Sturm R, Hattori A. Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37(6):889-91.

Memtsoudis SG, Besculides MC, Zellos L, Patterson T, Kader AA, Perrotta P. Utilization of regional anesthesia for urological procedures in the United States: a nationwide analysis. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1222-8.

Valdivia JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M, Gross AJ, Nadler RB, Nutahara K, et al. Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES). J Urol. 2011;186(3):937-43.

Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475-82.

Manohar T, Ganpule A, Desai M. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: advantages and disadvantages. J Endourol. 2007;21(12):1488-91.

Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr, Klar J, Lwanga SK. Adequacy of sample size in health studies. Chichester: Wiley; 1990.

Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM. The Guy’s stone score—grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology. 2011;78(2):277-81.

Valdivia JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M, Gross AJ, Nadler RB, Nutahara K, et al. Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES). J Urol. 2011;186(3):937-43.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13.

Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475-82.

Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475-82.

Valdivia JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M, Gross AJ, Nadler RB, Nutahara K, et al. Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES). J Urol. 2011;186(3):937-43.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205-13.

Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM. The Guy’s stone score—grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology. 2011;78(2):277-81.

Smith A, Averch TD, Shahrour K, Opondo D, Daels FP, Labate G, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a critical review of the complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):660-7.

Sturm R, Hattori A. Morbid obesity rates continue to rise rapidly in the United States. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37(6):889-91.

Memtsoudis SG, Besculides MC, Zellos L, Patterson T, Kader AA, Perrotta P. Utilization of regional anesthesia for urological procedures in the United States: a nationwide analysis. J Urol. 2013;189(4):1222-8.

Manohar T, Ganpule A, Desai M. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: advantages and disadvantages. J Endourol. 2007;21(12):1488-91.

Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW Jr, Klar J, Lwanga SK. Adequacy of sample size in health studies. Chichester: Wiley; 1990.

Turk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Skolarikos A, Straub M, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475-82.

Valdivia JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M, Gross AJ, Nadler RB, Nutahara K, et al. Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES). J Urol. 2011;186(3):937-43.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-20

How to Cite

KHAN, . F., & INAMULLAH, . S. (2024). ASSESSMENT OF THE FEASIBILITY AND SAFETY OF SUPINE PER CUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY UNDER REGIONAL ANESTHESIA FOR OBESE PATIENTS WITH A BODY MASS INDEX &gt;30. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2024(1), 945. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.945