EFFICACY OF WHIRLPOOL MECHANISM IN RETRIEVAL OF STONE FRAGMENTS (HYDRODYNAMIC STONE RETRIEVAL THROUGH PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY) COMPARED TO FORCEPS IN MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (MINI-PCNL)

Authors

  • M KHAN Department of urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases (IKD) Peshawar, Pakistan
  • N KHAN Department of urology, Bacha Khan Medical Complex, Swabi, Pakistan
  • Z MAJEED Department of urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases (IKD) Peshawar, Pakista
  • MS KHAN Department of urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases (IKD) Peshawar, Pakistan
  • RA KHAN Department of urology, Institute of Kidney Diseases (IKD) Peshawar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1451

Keywords:

Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Kidney Stones, Whirlpool Mechanism, Forceps Retrieval, Stone Clearance, Postoperative Complications

Abstract

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) is a widely adopted technique for the treatment of renal stones, offering minimal invasiveness and high success rates. Efficient retrieval of stone fragments is critical for surgical success. This study compares the efficacy and safety of the whirlpool mechanism versus forceps retrieval during mini-PCNL in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Objective: To evaluate the stone clearance rates, operative time, hospital stay, and complications associated with the whirlpool mechanism compared to forceps retrieval in mini-PCNL. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial included 90 patients undergoing mini-PCNL at the Institute of Kidney Diseases (IKD), Peshawar. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A (whirlpool mechanism) and Group B (forceps retrieval), with 45 patients each. Data on stone clearance rates, operative time, hospital stay, and complications were collected and analyzed using SPSS version 26, with a p-value ≤0.05 considered significant. Results: The stone clearance rate was significantly higher in Group A (91.1%) compared to Group B (77.8%, p=0.042). Operative time was slightly longer in Group A (90.6 ± 12.4 minutes) than in Group B (82.3 ± 10.7 minutes, p=0.032). Group A demonstrated a shorter hospital stay (2.8 ± 0.6 days) compared to Group B (3.4 ± 0.7 days, p=0.021). Complication rates, including bleeding, infection, and urinary leaks, were low and comparable between the groups. Conclusion: The whirlpool mechanism significantly enhances stone clearance rates and shortens hospital stays compared to forceps retrieval, with a comparable safety profile. These findings support the adoption of the whirlpool mechanism as a preferred method for stone fragment retrieval during mini-PCNL, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rizvi SAH, Sultan S, Zafar MN. Renal stone disease in Pakistan: Epidemiology and management. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(3):568–573. doi:10.12669/pjms.36.3.2049.

Shaikh SA, Qureshi AH, Bhatti SH. Current trends in the prevalence and management of urolithiasis in Pakistan. Int J Urol. 2022;29(6):527–534. doi:10.1111/iju.14811.

Türk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2021;80(5):674–683. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.09.023.

Bansal SS, Arora A, Singh P. Mini-PCNL for renal stones: A review of current best practices. World J Urol. 2022;40(2):365–376. doi:10.1007/s00345-021-03865-5.

Desai MR, Aron M, Ganpule A. Techniques of stone fragmentation and retrieval during mini-PCNL. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021;14(3):345–355. doi:10.1111/ases.12975.

Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Li H. Efficacy of hydrodynamic-assisted stone retrieval in mini-PCNL. Urology. 2020;136:84–89. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.014.

Saeed A, Khan SA, Rehman S. Challenges and outcomes of mini-PCNL in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Pak J Surg. 2023;39(1):12–18. doi:10.48036/pjs.2023.1.4.

Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Li H. Efficacy of hydrodynamic-assisted stone retrieval in mini-PCNL. Urology. 2020;136:84–89. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.014.

Desai MR, Aron M, Ganpule A. Techniques of stone fragmentation and retrieval during mini-PCNL. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021;14(3):345–355. doi:10.1111/ases.12975.

Hollinsky C, Kolbe T, Walter I. Comparative evaluation of hydrodynamic and manual retrieval techniques in mini-PCNL: A systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(4):2231–2239. doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07885-9.

Bansal SS, Arora A, Singh P. Mini-PCNL for renal stones: A review of current best practices. World J Urol. 2022;40(2):365–376. doi:10.1007/s00345-021-03865-5.

Köckerling F, Köckerling D, Lammers BJ. Techniques and materials for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A summary of the current evidence. Front Surg. 2021;8:640802. doi:10.3389/fsurg.2021.640802.

Türk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, et al. EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2021;80(5):674–683. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2021.09.023.

Ullah M, Iqbal M, Anwar S. Advanced stone retrieval techniques in mini-PCNL: A comparative review. Pak J Urol. 2023;45(2):120–127. doi:10.32413/pju.v45i2.1043.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

KHAN , M., KHAN , N., MAJEED , Z., KHAN , M., & KHAN , R. (2024). EFFICACY OF WHIRLPOOL MECHANISM IN RETRIEVAL OF STONE FRAGMENTS (HYDRODYNAMIC STONE RETRIEVAL THROUGH PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY) COMPARED TO FORCEPS IN MINI-PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY (MINI-PCNL). Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2024(1), 1451. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1451

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>