RADIATION EXPOSURE IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY: STRATEGIES FOR REDUCTION AND PROTECTION

A KAMAL; MAUR KHAN; NS SADIQ

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.518

Authors

A KAMAL Cardiac Family PVT Limited, Fuaji Foundation Hospital Peshawar
MAUR KHAN Sligo University Hospital, County Sligo
NS SADIQ Mayo General Hospital Castlebar, County Mayo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.518

Abstract

Occupational radiation exposure is a significant concern among healthcare professionals, particularly those in interventional radiology and cardiology procedures. This study aims to comprehensively investigate radiation exposure and its health effects among 200 healthcare professionals, including 100 physicians, 50 nurses, and 50 technicians, across five hospitals. The study employed a controlled, multi-center, observational design, with 100 participants in the experimental group exposed to enhanced radiation protection strategies, while 100 participants in the control group adhered to standard safety protocols. The interventions included additional lead barriers, radiation-absorbent pads, real-time dose monitoring systems, and continuous staff training on radiation safety. Exposure levels were measured using personal dosimeters at regular intervals before and after the interventions. Subgroup analysis was conducted based on professional roles and procedure types, categorized into simple and complex interventions. The results showed a statistically significant reduction in annual radiation exposure in the experimental group compared to the control group, with substantial effect sizes. Subgroup analysis revealed varying degrees of exposure reduction among different professional roles. Notably, complex interventions demonstrated the most substantial reductions in radiation exposure. Furthermore, an analysis of X-ray beam angles indicated a statistically significant increase in exposure at steep angles (≥30°). However, no significant interaction between the control and experimental groups was observed, suggesting that other variables may influence the relationship between steep angles and exposure. The findings of this study emphasize the effectiveness of enhanced protection strategies in reducing occupational radiation exposure among healthcare professionals. The nuanced effects observed across different professional roles and procedure types underscore the importance of tailored safety measures. These results contribute to the ongoing efforts to optimize radiation safety in medical settings and promote the well-being of healthcare professionals. Ethical considerations, adherence to international standards, and the potential implications for policy and guidelines further underscore the significance of this study's findings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar, S., Scotton, C. J., McNulty, K., Nye, E., Stamp, G., Laurent, G., Bonnet, D., and Janes, S. M. (2009). Bone marrow stem cells expressing keratinocyte growth factor via an inducible lentivirus protects against bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. PloS one 4, e8013.

Andreassi, M. G., Piccaluga, E., Guagliumi, G., Del Greco, M., Gaita, F., and Picano, E. (2016). Occupational health risks in cardiac catheterization laboratory workers. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions 9, e003273.

Balter, S., and Miller, D. L. (2014). Patient skin reactions from interventional fluoroscopy procedures. American Journal of Roentgenology 202, W335-W342.

Baudin, C., Bernier, M.-O., Klokov, D., and Andreassi, M. G. (2021). Biomarkers of genotoxicity in medical workers exposed to low-dose ionizing radiation: systematic review and meta-analyses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22, 7504.

Brower, C., and Rehani, M. M. (2021). Radiation risk issues in recurrent imaging. The British journal of radiology 94, 20210389.

Campolo, J., Annoni, G., Giaccardi, M., and Andreassi, M. G. (2022). Congenital heart disease and the risk of cancer: an update on the genetic etiology, radiation exposure damage, and future research strategies. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 9, 245.

Domienik, J., Bissinger, A., Grabowicz, W., Kręcki, R., Makowski, M., Masiarek, K., Plewka, M., Lubiński, A., and Peruga, J. (2016). The impact of various protective tools on the dose reduction in the eye lens in an interventional cardiology—clinical study. Journal of Radiological Protection 36, 309.

Ford, J. (2004). Sterile pharmaceutical products. Denyer SP, Hodges NA, Gorman SP (eds). Hugo & Russell’s-Pharmaceutical Microbiology, ed 7, Blackwell Science, 323-345.

Gupta, A., Chhikara, S., Vijayvergiya, R., Barwad, P., Prasad, K., Datta, R., Mahesh, N. K., Maurya, P., and Singh, N. (2021). Radiation exposure reduction and patient outcome by using very low frame rate fluoroscopy protocol (3.8+ 7.5 fps) during percutaneous coronary intervention. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 8, 625873.

Ho, T. L., Shieh, S. H., Lin, C. L., Shen, W. C., and Kao, C. H. (2016). Risk of cancer among cardiologists who frequently perform percutaneous coronary interventions: a population‐based study. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 46, 527-534.

Hosny, A., Parmar, C., Quackenbush, J., Schwartz, L. H., and Aerts, H. J. (2018). Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nature Reviews Cancer 18, 500-510.

Li, X., Bao, Y., Jia, K., Zhang, N., Lin, C., Wei, Y., Xie, Y., Luo, Q., Ling, T., and Chen, K. (2022). Comparison of the Mid-Term Outcomes of Robotic Magnetic Navigation-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation versus Cryoballoon Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 9, 88.

Little, M. P., Azizova, T. V., Bazyka, D., Bouffler, S. D., Cardis, E., Chekin, S., Chumak, V. V., Cucinotta, F. A., de Vathaire, F., and Hall, P. (2012). Systematic review and meta-analysis of circulatory disease from exposure to low-level ionizing radiation and estimates of potential population mortality risks. Environmental health perspectives 120, 1503-1511.

Lopes, J., Leuraud, K., Klokov, D., Durand, C., Bernier, M.-O., and Baudin, C. (2022). Risk of developing non-cancerous central nervous system diseases due to ionizing radiation exposure during adulthood: Systematic review and meta-analyses. Brain Sciences 12, 984.

Picano, E., Vano, E., Rehani, M. M., Cuocolo, A., Mont, L., Bodi, V., Bar, O., Maccia, C., Pierard, L., and Sicari, R. (2014). The appropriate and justified use of medical radiation in cardiovascular imaging: a position document of the ESC Associations of Cardiovascular Imaging, Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions and Electrophysiology. European heart journal 35, 665-672.

Rizzo, J. D., Wingard, J. R., Tichelli, A., Lee, S. J., Van Lint, M. T., Burns, L. J., Davies, S. M., Ferrara, J. L., and Socié, G. (2006). Recommended screening and preventive practices for long-term survivors after hematopoietic cell transplantation: joint recommendations of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, and the American Society of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 12, 138-151.

Rutala, W. A., and Weber, D. J. (2008). Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities, 2008.

Wang, W.-H., Wei, K.-C., Huang, W.-C., Yen, Y.-Y., and Mar, G.-Y. (2021). Radiation Reduction and Protection for Radiosensitive Organs (Lens, Thyroid, and Genital Organs) of Patients Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention—Real-World Measurement of Radiation Dose in a Single Center. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 8, 99.

Wei, K.-C., Lin, H.-Y., Hung, S.-K., Huang, Y.-T., Lee, M.-S., Wang, W.-H., Wu, C.-S., Su, Y.-C., Shen, B.-J., and Tsai, S.-J. (2016). Leukemia risk after cardiac fluoroscopic interventions stratified by procedure number, exposure latent time, and sex: a nationwide population-based case-control study. Medicine 95.