Comparison of The Efficacy of Audiovisual Tools and Intranasal Midazolam in Reducing Preoperative Anxiety in Pediatric Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i9.2010Keywords:
Pediatric anxiety, intranasal midazolam, audiovisual tools, Preoperative preparation, Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS)Abstract
Preoperative anxiety is a common psychological challenge in pediatric surgical patients that can affect induction, recovery, and overall surgical experience. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions have been used to manage anxiety, with intranasal midazolam (INM) and audiovisual tools being among the most promising. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of audiovisual tools versus intranasal midazolam in reducing preoperative anxiety in children undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at the National Hospital and Medical Centre, Lahore, from May to November 2024. Sixty pediatric patients aged 5–13 years, ASA class I or II, were randomly assigned to two equal groups. Group A received audiovisual distraction (cartoons, movies, or video games), while Group B received intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg, maximum 10 mg). Anxiety levels were measured using the Modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale (mYPAS) at three time points: upon arrival (T1), 60 minutes before intervention (T2), and 15 minutes before induction (T3). Efficacy was defined as achieving an mYPAS score ≤30 before induction. Data were analyzed using SPSS v26.0, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: Both interventions effectively reduced preoperative anxiety, but the reduction was significantly greater in the audiovisual group. Mean mYPAS scores decreased from 45.93 ± 2.66 at T1 to 26.37 ± 3.66 at T3 in Group A, and from 44.83 ± 3.70 to 29.13 ± 4.83 in Group B. Effective anxiolysis (mYPAS ≤30) was achieved in 90% of patients in Group A versus 63.3% in Group B (p = 0.015). Audiovisual tools were particularly effective among younger (5–9 years) and female participants. No significant adverse events were reported in either group. Conclusion: Audiovisual tools demonstrated superior efficacy compared with intranasal midazolam in alleviating preoperative anxiety among pediatric patients. As a safe, non-invasive, and engaging alternative, audiovisual distraction should be considered a preferred approach for preoperative anxiety management, especially in resource-limited and pediatric-centered surgical settings.
Downloads
References
Lethin M., Paluska M., Petersen T., Falcon R., & Soneru C. Midazolam for anesthetic premedication in children: considerations and alternatives. Cureus 2023. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.50309
Mohajeri E., Mayel M., Nejad M., Khabaz M., & Bazrafshani M. Intranasal midazolam sedation as an effective sedation route in pediatric patients for radiologic imaging in the emergency ward: a single-masked randomized trial. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine 2020; 20(4):168-174. https://doi.org/10.4103/2452-2473.297461
Ali M., George J., & Deepak S... Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine and midazolam as premedication on haemodynamic stability. International Journal of Health Sciences 2022:13018-13027. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns2.8426
Prasad M., Shobharani S., Kumar P., Girish B., Durairaju A., & Andiappan A. Comparative evaluation of atomized intranasal midazolam and intranasal ketamine as sedative premedication in children for child-parent separation. International Journal of Health Sciences 2022:14292-14300. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6ns2.8793
Jain S., Patel S., Arora K., & Sharma A... A comparative study on the effectiveness of parental presence versus sedative premedication for reducing anxiety in children undergoing general anesthesia. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research 2023; 13(2):101-105. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_636_22
Lang B., Wang H., Fu Y., Zeng L., Huang L., Zhang Q.et al.. Efficacy and safety of intranasal midazolam versus intranasal ketamine as sedative premedication in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiology 2022; 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01892-2
Ahmed A., Daak L., Alayidh M., Filfilan R., Alathath R., Rehbini A.et al.. The role of preoperative virtual reality for anxiety reduction in pediatric surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus 2025. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.77077
Dehghan F., Jalali R., & Bashiri H.. The effect of virtual reality technology on preoperative anxiety in children: a Solomon four-group randomized clinical trial. Perioperative Medicine 2019;8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-019-0116-0
Ryu J., Ko D., Han J., Park J., Shin A., Han S.et al.. The proper timing of virtual reality experience for reducing preoperative anxiety of pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. Frontiers in Pediatrics 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.899152
Yousef A., Eid G., Messbah W., & Azzam E.. The effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy suffering from recent mild upper respiratory tract infection. International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology 2023;6(4):01-07. https://doi.org/10.33545/26643766.2023.v6.i4a.427
Kaur T., Kumar P., Kundra T., & Kaur I. Comparison of intranasal midazolam-fentanyl with dexmedetomidine–fentanyl as pre-medication in the paediatric age group. The Indian Journal of Medical Research 2023;157(1):51-56. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_759_20
Alp H., Elmacı A., Esma K., & Say B.. Comparison of intranasal midazolam, intranasal ketamine, and oral chloral hydrate for conscious sedation during paediatric echocardiography: results of a prospective randomised study. Cardiology in the Young 2019;29(09):1189-1195. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1047951119001835
Palmese S., Bilancio G., Caterino V., Anseris A., Perciato S., Siglioccolo A., et al. Combination of intranasal dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in pediatric magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatric Emergency Care 2023;40(6):430-433. https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0000000000003086
Gupta A., Gupta H., Jamwal A., & Gulati S.. Comparative evaluation of midazolam and clonidine as premedicants in children undergoing elective orodental surgeries: a randomized, double blind trial. Iar Journal of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care 2022;03(01):1-5. https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjacc.2022.v03i01.002
Swaminathan K., Shan S., SS M., Renugalakshmi A., Ravi R., & Haridoss S.. Efficacy of intranasal sedation for pediatric dental procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2025;25(1):1. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2025.25.1.1
Annan B., Darkwa E., Anno A., Vanderpuye N., Baffour-Awuah L., Adjei G.et al.. Appropriateness and safety of using the intranasal route for sedation during pediatric computed tomography: a randomized controlled trial at Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital. Journal of International Medical Research 2025;53(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605251357455
Nie J., Chen C., Xie J., & Ding G. Oral midazolam vs. intranasal dexmedetomidine plus oral midazolam for sedation of pediatric outpatients: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiology 2023;23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-023-02289-5
Yıldırım M., Ülgey A., Talıh G., Doğan H., & Güneş I. Evaluation of the perioperative effects of dexmedetomidine and midazolam-ketamine premedication in strabismus surgery. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus 2023;60(6):427-434. https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20221219-01
Cai Y., Wang C., Li Y., Chen J., Li J., Wu J.et al.. Comparison of oral midazolam and intranasal dexmedetomidine effects on preoperative sedation and anesthesia induction in children undergoing surgeries. Frontiers in Pharmacology 2021;12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.648699.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kalsoom Farrukh, Muhammad Munib Ramzan, Adeela Ikram

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

