Diagnostic Accuracy of Resistive Index of Doppler Ultrasound in Diagnosing Malignant Ovarian Tumors, Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard

Authors

  • Sadaf Ibrahim Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan
  • Sajida Majeed Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan
  • Hafiz Haseeb Ahsan Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan
  • Adeela Sarfraz Khan Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan
  • Sadia Abdulmajeed Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan
  • Azka Mushtaq Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.1999

Keywords:

Doppler, ovarian tumors, benign, malignant, resistive index, sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy

Abstract

Ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of gynecologic malignancy-related mortality worldwide due to delayed diagnosis and nonspecific clinical presentation. Differentiating benign from malignant ovarian tumors preoperatively is essential for optimal patient management and surgical planning. Doppler ultrasound, particularly the assessment of resistive index (RI), has emerged as a valuable, non-invasive diagnostic tool for evaluating adnexal masses. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the resistive index of Doppler ultrasound in diagnosing malignant ovarian tumour, taking histopathology as the Gold standard. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Sheikh Zayed Hospital's radiology department from September 2024 to February 2025. It involved patients presenting with adnexal masses on ultrasound, following ethical approval and informed consent. A sample size of 110 was determined based on a 95% confidence level, with a focus on malignant ovarian tumors. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 20 to 60 years, with a disease duration exceeding three months and specific ultrasound characteristics. Patients with simple cysts, metabolic disorders, and prior anti-tumor treatments were excluded. Each subject underwent Doppler sonography, and the resistive index (RI) was measured to differentiate between benign and malignant tumors. Surgical samples were analyzed histopathologically to confirm diagnoses. Data were recorded using a proforma and analyzed with SPSS 25.0, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the Doppler ultrasound findings compared to histopathology results. Stratification was applied based on age, disease duration, and other variables. Result: In our study, the mean age of patients was 39.08 years, with a disease duration of 20.27 months and average lesion sizes of 10.48 mm. Among participants, 70.8% had benign tumors and 29.2% malignant, with significant differences noted in marital status. Doppler color ultrasound identified 75.5% of lesions as benign and 24.5% malignant, yielding a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 91.76%. Notably, benign tumors averaged 8.18 mm, while malignant ones were larger at 17.55 mm (p-value 0.00). Conclusion: Doppler ultrasound, particularly resistive index, effectively differentiates benign from malignant ovarian tumors, with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 91.76%. Younger women tend to have benign lesions, while older, postmenopausal women are at higher risk for malignancy, making this tool vital for early screening.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Momenimovahed Z, Tiznobaik A, Taheri S, Salehiniya H. Ovarian cancer in the world: epidemiology and risk factors. Int J Womens Health. 2019;11:287–299. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S197604

Abramowicz JS, Timmerman D. Clinical opinion: ovarian mass—differentiating benign from malignant: the value of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis ultrasound rules. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(6):652–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.030

Kalsoom U, Arooj S, Raja R, Mushtaq R, Masood M. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal Doppler ultrasound in differentiating malignant and benign ovarian masses. Ann King Edw Med Univ. 2020;26(2):359–365. [No DOI assigned].

Salem S, White LM, Lai J. Doppler sonography of adnexal masses: the predictive value of the pulsatility index in benign and malignant disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(5):1147–1150. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.163.5.7976891

Ovarian Cancer Research Alliance. Detection & Diagnosis [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Oct 11]. Available from: https://ocrahope.org/for-patients/gynecologic-cancers/ovarian-cancer/detection-diagnosis/ [No DOI assigned].

Cancer Treatment Centers of America. Ovarian biopsy [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2025 Oct 11]. Available from: https://www.cancercenter.com/cancer-types/ovarian-cancer/diagnosis-and-detection/biopsy [No DOI assigned].

American Cancer Society. Tests for ovarian cancer | How is ovarian cancer diagnosed? [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Oct 11]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/ovarian-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/how-diagnosed.html [No DOI assigned].

Gorski JW, Quattrone M, van Nagell JR, Pavlik EJ. Assessing the costs of screening for ovarian cancer in the United States: an evolving analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(2):67. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10020067

Gheshlaghi PA, Farahani ZB, Anboohi SZ, Nasiri M, Ziapour A, Garosi VH. Effect of family presence on pain and anxiety levels among patients during invasive nursing procedures in an emergency department at a public hospital in Western Iran. Afr J Emerg Med. 2021;11(1):31–36.

Sokalska A, Timmerman D, Testa AC, Van Calster B, Lissoni AA, Leone FP. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;34(4):462–470. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6444

Khalaf LMR, Desoky HMM, Seifeldein GS, Salah A, Amine MA, Hussien MT. Sonographic and Doppler predictors of malignancy in ovarian lesions. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2020;51:44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-020-00172-8

Mansour TMM, Tawfik MH, El-Barody MH, Sileem Okasha A. Correlation between ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Al-Azhar Int Med J. 2020;1(12):214–223.

Prasad S, Jha MK, Sahu S, Bharat I, Sehgel C. Evaluation of ovarian masses by colour Doppler and histopathological correlation. Int J Contemp Med Surg Radiol. 2019;4(2):B95–B101. [No DOI assigned].

Neelam S, Hayat Z, Jawairiah, Saleem J, Sarwat A. Efficacy of Doppler ultrasound in detection of ovarian malignancy. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(8):878–879

Tariq T, Janjua M, Wajid R, Sarwar A, Mubeen S, Zahra S. Diagnostic accuracy of color Doppler indices for differentiation of benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Ann Int Med Dent Res. 2020;6(5):OG05–OG10.

Irshad N, Arshad A, Nasrullah Z. Diagnostic accuracy of resistive index in Doppler imaging in diagnosing malignant and benign adnexal masses. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2021;71(1):343–346.

Sheikh A. Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler in identifying malignant ovarian neoplasms taking histopathology as gold standard. J Islamic Int Med Coll. 2020;15(4):217–221.

Hameer R, Aijaz S, Hussain A, Usman S, Radha, Raj E, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in differentiating ovarian neoplasm, by taking histopathology as gold standard. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2024;31(1):334–344. https://doi.org/10.53555/jptcp.v31i1.4001

Zhou L, Xuan Z, Yu W. Diagnostic value of ultrasound score, color Doppler ultrasound RI and spiral CT for ovarian tumors. Oncol Lett. 2019;17(6):5499–5504. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10310

Saleem A. Diagnostic accuracy of Color Doppler and Spectral Doppler in identifying malignant ovarian neoplasm using… [Internet]. 2020 Dec;15(4):217–222.

Liaquat F, Abbas HY, Ali N, Waheed A, Ghafoor S, Tahir A. [Internet]. PJMHS Online. 2020 [cited 2025 May 5]. Available from: https://pjmhsonline.com/published-issues/2020-issues/oct-dec-2020/20-12-1170

Nahar K, Begum SA, Jalali MH, Sharmin F, Akhter L, Khanam S. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between CT scan and colour Doppler USG in detecting malignant ovarian tumour. Scholars Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;7(12):592–598. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijog.2024.v07i12.001

Akutay S, Ceyhan Ö. The relationship between fear of surgery and affecting factors in surgical patients. Perioper Med (Lond). 2023;12:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-023-00316-0

Agarwal V. What is the role of non-invasive imaging in diagnostics? [Internet]. Lotus Diagnostic; 2023 [cited 2025 Oct 11]. Available from: https://lotusdiagnostic.com/what-is-the-role-of-non-invasive-imaging-in-diagnostics/

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Ibrahim, S. ., Majeed, S. ., Ahsan, H. H. ., Khan, A. S. ., Abdulmajeed, S. ., & Mushtaq, A. . (2025). Diagnostic Accuracy of Resistive Index of Doppler Ultrasound in Diagnosing Malignant Ovarian Tumors, Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 6(5), 362–366. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.1999

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)