Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Evaluation of Uterine Masses in Detection of Uterine Carcinoma, Taking Histopathology as a Gold Standard

Authors

  • Hina Akber Rao Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Karachi, Pakistan
  • Shaista Shauka Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Karachi, Pakistan
  • Sumaira Shahbaz Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Karachi, Pakistan
  • Tariq Mahmood T.I Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Karachi, Pakistan
  • Asifa Akbar Dow University of Health Sciences (Duhs), Pakistan
  • Maryiam Akber Ziaudin University Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1939

Keywords:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Uterine Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Diagnostic Accuracy, Histopathology

Abstract

Uterine carcinoma is one of the most prevalent gynecological malignancies worldwide, and timely diagnosis is critical for guiding treatment decisions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used for preoperative evaluation; however, its diagnostic accuracy compared to histopathology—the reference standard—remains variable across different settings. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in detecting uterine carcinoma, comparing it with histopathological findings as the reference standard. Methods: After obtaining ethical approval from the institutional review board, this cross-sectional study was conducted at the Radiology department of JPMC, Karachi, from January 1, 2023, to June 30, 2023. Through non-probability consecutive sampling, patients aged 35 years and above who underwent both pelvic MRI and subsequent histopathological evaluation (via biopsy or post-surgical specimen analysis) were included. Patients with prior hysterectomy, contraindications to MRI (such as metallic implants or severe claustrophobia), or incomplete histopathology reports were excluded from the study. Results: The diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting uterine carcinoma was as follows: sensitivity was 54.90%, specificity was 63.27%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 51.0%, negative predictive value (NPV) was 60.87%, and the overall diagnostic accuracy was calculated to be 59.0%. Conclusion: MRI provides useful but suboptimal discrimination between benign and malignant uterine masses in routine settings, achieving only moderate accuracy without the use of advanced sequences or specialist interpretation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Makker V, MacKay H, Ray-Coquard I, Levine DA, Westin SN, Aoki D, et al. Endometrial cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):88. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00324-8

Gu B, Shang X, Yan M, Li X, Wang W, Wang Q, et al. Variations in incidence and mortality rates of endometrial cancer at the global, regional, and national levels, 1990–2019. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;161(2):573-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.036

Kaminsky LA, German C, Imboden M, Ozemek C, Peterman JE, Brubaker PH. The importance of healthy lifestyle behaviors in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022;70:8-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2021.12.001

Gala FB, Gala KB, Gala BM. Magnetic resonance imaging of the uterine cervix: a pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2021;31(2):454-67. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1734377

Winarto H, Habiburrahman M, Siregar TP, Perdana E, Lubis NZ, Sari L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging pitfalls in determining myometrial invasion in stage I endometrial cancer: a case report and literature review. Radiol Case Rep. 2022;17(8):2680-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2022.05.021

Lukanović D, Matjašič M, Kobal B. Accuracy of preoperative sampling diagnosis for predicting final pathology in patients with endometrial carcinoma: a review. Transl Cancer Res. 2020;9(12):7785-96. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2228

Kinkel K, Kaji Y, Yu KK, Segal MR, Lu Y, Powell CB, et al. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology. 1999;212(3):711-8. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.212.3.r99au29711

Nurdillah I, Wulandari RA, Primashifa CA, Arifin R, Agustin R. A comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and T2-weighted imaging in determining the depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma: a retrospective study. J Pers Med. 2022;12(8):1268. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12081268

Cabrita S, Rodrigues H, Abreu R, Martins M, Teixeira L, Marques C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2008;29(2):135-7. https://doi.org/10.12892/ejgo200802135

Xie M, Zhang C, Han C, Wu W, Zhou L, Wang J, et al. High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging with readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains for determining myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Imaging. 2020;20(1):66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00346-7

Messina C, Bignotti B, Bruno A, Grazioli L, Albano D, Corazza A, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in oncology: an update. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(6):1493. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061493

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Rao, H. A. ., Shauka, S. ., Shahbaz, S. ., Mahmood T.I, T. ., Akbar, A. ., & Akber, M. . (2025). Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Evaluation of Uterine Masses in Detection of Uterine Carcinoma, Taking Histopathology as a Gold Standard. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 6(6), 366–369. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1939

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles