Frequency of Placenta Previa Among Pregnant Patients With Scarred and Unscarred Uterus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.1734Keywords:
Cesarean Section, Gravidity, Placenta Accreta, Placenta Previa, Pregnancy Trimester, Uterine ScarAbstract
Placenta previa is a serious obstetric condition typically observed during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. It poses a significant risk for maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality, particularly when associated with prior uterine surgical interventions such as cesarean sections. A history of uterine scarring is a recognized risk factor for placenta previa and its more severe variant, placenta accreta. Objective: To determine the prevalence of placenta previa in pregnant women with and without previous uterine scarring presenting to a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A cross- sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology at Divisional Headquarter Hospital, Mirpur, from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. A total of 150 pregnant women aged 15–45 years, with gestational age’s ≥28 weeks and singleton pregnancies, were enrolled using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Participants were categorized based on the presence or absence of uterine scarring. Women with second-trimester bleeding or primigravida status were excluded. Relevant obstetric history, including parity, gravidity, and gestational age, was documented. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 24. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. Categorical data were presented as frequencies and percentages; continuous data were reported as means ± standard deviations. Results: The mean age of participants was 34.23 ± 12.34 years, with the majority (45.7%) between 26–30 years of age. Regarding gestational age, 13.8% were between 28–32 weeks, 20.83% between 31–35 weeks, and 65.2% between 36–40 weeks. A total of 100 women (66.66%) had previously scarred uteri, while 5 (31.95%) had unscarred uteri. Vaginal delivery history was noted in 46 women. In terms of gravidity, 110 (73.3%) were G2–G4, 35 (23.33%) were G5– G7, and above. Placenta previa was significantly more prevalent among women with a history of uterine scarring. Conclusion: The findings indicate a higher prevalence of placenta previa among women with prior uterine scarring compared to those without. This underscores the need for vigilant prenatal screening and risk stratification in women with a history of cesarean sections or uterine surgeries.
Downloads
References
Wortman AC, Twickler DM, McIntire DD, Dashe JS. Bleeding complications in pregnancies with a low-lying placenta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(9):1367–71.
https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1051023
Kietpeerakool C, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Rattanakanokchai S, Vogel JP, Gülmezoglu AM. Pregnancy outcomes of women with previous caesarean sections: Secondary analysis of World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):9748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019- 46153-4
Iacovelli A, Liberati M, Khalil A, Timor-Tritsch I, Leombroni M, Buca D, et al. Risk factors for abnormally invasive placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(3):471–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1493453
Kong CW, To WWK. Trends in conservative procedures and peripartum hysterectomy rates in severe postpartum haemorrhage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(21):2820–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1357169
Cheng PJ, Duan T. China's new two-child policy: maternity care in the new multiparous era. BJOG. 2016;123(Suppl 3):7–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14290
Kavitha B, Hota BM. Clinical study of placenta previa in scarred and unscarred uterus. J Dr NTR Univ Health Sci. 2018;7(1):13. https://doi.org/10.4103/JDRNTRUHS.JDRNTRUHS_3_18
Hung TH, Hsieh CC, Hsu JJ, Chiu TH, Lo LM, Hsieh TT. Risk factors for placenta previa in an Asian population. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;97(1):26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.12.006
Vahanian SA, Lavery JA, Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM. Placental implantation abnormalities and risk of preterm delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4 Suppl):S78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.043
Yang X, Li Y, Li C, Zhang W. Current overview of pregnancy complications and live-birth outcome of assisted reproductive technology in mainland China. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):385–91.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.026
Fan D, Wu S, Liu L, Xia Q, Wang W, Guo X, et al. Prevalence of antepartum hemorrhage in women with placenta previa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):40320. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40320
Upreti R, Rauniyar A, Rauniyar S, Ansari SN, Khadka M. A comparative study of obstetrics outcome of placenta previa in scarred versus unscarred uterus at tertiary Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2020;9(8):3183–8. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20203384
Price SM, Caughey AB. The impact of prenatal care on pregnancy outcomes in women with depression. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1522520
Kanwel N, Ghafoor B, Qadir MM. Frequency of Placenta Previa in scarred and unscarred uterus. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2017;29(3):468–71.
Majeed T, Waheed F, Mahmood Z, Saba K, Mahmood H, Bukhari MH. Frequency of placenta previa in previously scarred and non- scarred uterus. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31(2):360–3. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.312.7034
Iqbal K, Abid R, Irfan R, Shaheen F. Comparison of Fetomaternal Outcome Between Scarred and Unscarred Uterus in Placenta Previa Cases. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Pak. 2016;6(3):102–5.
Umbeli T, Salah I, Kunna A, Rabaa A, Mirghani SM. Association of placenta praevia with repeat cesarean section in Omdurman Maternity Hospital, Sudan 2010–2012. Sudan J Med Sci. 2013;8(4):159–62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sana Aslam, Saima Perveen, Arooj Jawad, Hina Zubair, Farzana Sabir, Hafsa Razzaq

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.