Comparison of Results of Standard Versus Accelerated Casting Method for Relapsed Club Foot Deformity

Authors

  • Muhammad Hassan Zafar Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Obaid Ur Rahman Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Usman Rafiq Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Usman Waleed Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • Maira Bukhari Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Hamza Razi 3Primary & Secondary Healthcare Department Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.1715

Keywords:

Relapsed clubfoot, Ponseti method, accelerated casting, standard casting, Pirani score, Pakistan, pediatric orthopedics

Abstract

Relapsed idiopathic clubfoot remains a significant clinical challenge in pediatric orthopedics, particularly in low-resource countries like Pakistan. While the standard Ponseti method with weekly casting is well-established, the accelerated casting method, requiring more frequent cast changes, offers potential advantages in reducing treatment time without compromising outcomes. Objective: To compare the effectiveness, complication rates, recurrence, and parental satisfaction between standard weekly casting and accelerated bi-weekly casting methods for relapsed clubfoot deformity in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted at the Department of Orthopedics, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, from September 15, 2024, to March 15, 2025. A total of 80 children with relapsed idiopathic clubfoot were divided into two equal groups: 40 treated with the standard Ponseti method and 40 with the accelerated method. Outcomes included a number of casts, treatment duration, Pirani score improvement, complication rates, recurrence at 6-month follow-up, and parental satisfaction using a 5-point Likert scale. Data were analyzed using SPSS v25.0, with independent t-tests and chi-square tests applied where appropriate. Results: Both groups achieved comparable deformity correction as reflected by similar final Pirani scores (0.7 ± 0.4 in standard vs. 0.6 ± 0.3 in accelerated, p = 0.312). The accelerated group required significantly fewer casts (5.1 ± 0.9 vs. 6.9 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and shorter treatment duration (2.6 ± 0.5 weeks vs. 6.9 ± 1.1 weeks, p < 0.001). Complication and recurrence rates were low and statistically similar in both groups. Parental satisfaction was significantly higher in the accelerated group (mean score 4.4 ± 0.5 vs. 3.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.002). Conclusion: The accelerated Ponseti method is a safe and effective alternative to standard casting for relapsed clubfoot, offering faster correction and higher caregiver satisfaction without increasing complications or recurrence. Its adoption may enhance compliance and reduce treatment burden in the Pakistani healthcare setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yasin R, Ali A, Noor S, Shah I. Prevalence and risk factors of clubfoot in newborns: A study from a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(4):1023–7.

Khan MA, Ahmed A, Qureshi OA. Management challenges of relapsed clubfoot: A review from a developing country perspective. J Pak Orthop Assoc. 2020;32(2):67–72.

Shabtai L, Specht SC, Herzenberg JE. Worldwide spread of the Ponseti method for clubfoot. World J Orthop. 2020;11(12):875–84.

Younas M, Azam M, Iqbal MZ, Saeed F. Comparison between standard and accelerated Ponseti methods in treating idiopathic clubfoot. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020;32(3):378–82.

Alam N, Mehmood T, Ahmed M, Khalid M. Early outcomes of accelerated Ponseti method in clubfoot management: A local experience. Pak J Surg. 2022;38(1):45–50.

Akbar MZ, Liaqat S, Shabbir S, Javed S. The burden of clubfoot treatment in rural areas of Pakistan: Challenges and opportunities. Pak J Public Health. 2021;11(1):43–7.

Sinha A, Goyal V, Singh S, Tiwari V. Accelerated versus standard Ponseti method for clubfoot: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020;29(5):476–80.

Rahman S, Jahan I, Hassan MZ. Outcomes of accelerated Ponseti method in relapsed clubfoot: Evidence from a low-resource setting. J Child Orthop. 2021;15(2):150–5.

Iqbal J, Noor S, Hayat M, Shah K. Early experience of using accelerated Ponseti technique in idiopathic clubfoot in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. J Med Sci. 2020;28(2):137–41.

Sinha A, Goyal V, Singh S, Tiwari V. Accelerated versus standard Ponseti method for clubfoot: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020;29(5):476–80.

Rahman S, Jahan I, Hassan MZ. Outcomes of accelerated Ponseti method in relapsed clubfoot: Evidence from a low-resource setting. J Child Orthop. 2021;15(2):150–5.

Younas M, Azam M, Iqbal MZ, Saeed F. Comparison between standard and accelerated Ponseti methods in treating idiopathic clubfoot. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020;32(3):378–82.

Alam N, Mehmood T, Ahmed M, Khalid M. Early outcomes of accelerated Ponseti method in clubfoot management: A local experience. Pak J Surg. 2022;38(1):45–50.

Akbar MZ, Liaqat S, Shabbir S, Javed S. The burden of clubfoot treatment in rural areas of Pakistan: Challenges and opportunities. Pak J Public Health. 2021;11(1):43–7.

Khan MA, Ahmed A, Qureshi OA. Management challenges of relapsed clubfoot: A review from a developing country perspective. J Pak Orthop Assoc. 2020;32(2):67–72.

Iqbal J, Noor S, Hayat M, Shah K. Early experience of using accelerated Ponseti technique in idiopathic clubfoot in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. J Med Sci. 2020;28(2):137–41.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-31

How to Cite

Zafar, M. H. ., Rahman, O. U. ., Rafiq, M. U. ., Waleed, U. ., Bukhari, M. ., & Razi, M. H. . (2025). Comparison of Results of Standard Versus Accelerated Casting Method for Relapsed Club Foot Deformity. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 6(5), 15–18. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i5.1715

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles