The Impact of the WHO Labor Guide on Reducing C-Sections at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Kanwal Jan  Memon; Nazia  Hakeem; Bushra  Maqsood; Faryal  kakepoto; Khatija  Jamil; Wajeeha  Karim

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v6i4.1663

Authors

Kanwal Jan Memon Department of Gynae & Obstetrics, Dow University of Health Sciences, Ojha Campus Karachi, Pakistan
Nazia Hakeem Department of Gynae & Obstetrics, Dow University of Health Sciences, Ojha Campus Karachi, Pakistan
Bushra Maqsood Department of Gynae & Obstetrics, Dow University of Health Sciences, Ojha Campus Karachi, Pakistan
Faryal kakepoto Department of Gynae & Obstetrics, Dow University of Health Sciences, Ojha Campus Karachi, Pakistan
Khatija Jamil Department of Gynae & Obstetrics, Dow University of Health Sciences, Ojha Campus Karachi, Pakistan
Wajeeha Karim Department of Gynae & Obstetrics, Dow University of Health Sciences, Ojha Campus Karachi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i4.1663

Keywords:

Labor Care Guide of WHO, cesarean section, labor monitoring, maternal outcomes, randomized controlled trial

Abstract

The global rise in cesarean section (CS) rates has become a major concern due to its association with increased maternal and neonatal complications without clear benefits in many cases. The World Health Organization (WHO) introduced the Labor Care Guide (LCG) in 2020 to improve labor monitoring, reduce unnecessary interventions, and promote positive birth outcomes. Objective: To assess the impact of the WHO LCG on reducing primary cesarean section rates and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes at a tertiary care hospital. Methodology: This randomized controlled trial was conducted over six months at Dow University Hospital, Ojha Campus, Karachi. Two hundred sixty pregnant women in spontaneous labor at 37–40 weeks' gestation were included. Participants were randomly allocated to the LCG group (n=130) or the control group (WHO-modified partograph; n=130). Maternal and neonatal outcomes were recorded, and healthcare provider feedback on LCG usability was collected using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v16. Results: The cesarean section rate was significantly lower in the LCG group (12.3%) compared to the control group (25.4%) (p=0.007). The LCG group also showed higher rates of vaginal delivery (85.4% vs. 70.0%, p=0.003), shorter labor duration, and better postpartum hemoglobin levels. Neonatal outcomes were comparable between groups. Healthcare providers rated the LCG favorably, with high ease of use, acceptability, and satisfaction scores. Conclusion: The LCG of WHO significantly reduced primary cesarean sections and improved labor outcomes without compromising neonatal safety. It is a feasible, effective, and acceptable tool in clinical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tunçalp Ö, Moller AB, Daniels J, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(6):e323–33.

Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):587–603.

Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29(1):7–18.

World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division: executive summary. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Report No.WHO/RHR/19.23.

Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667–70.

Pandey D, Bharti R, Dabral A, Khanam Z. Impact of WHO Labor Care Guide on reducing cesarean sections at a tertiary center: an open-label randomized controlled trial. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022;2(3):100075.

Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):179–93.

Wiklund I, Malata AM, Cheung NF, Cadée F. Appropriate use of caesarean section globally requires a different approach. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1288–9.

Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, Laughon SK, Branch DW, Burkman R, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):326.e1–10.

Abalos E, Oladapo OT, Chamillard M, Díaz V, Pasquale J, Bonet M, et al. Duration of spontaneous labour in 'low-risk' women with 'normal' perinatal outcomes: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;223:123–32.

Oladapo OT, Diaz V, Bonet M, Abalos E, Thwin SS, Souza H, et al. Cervical dilatation patterns of 'low-risk' women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125(8):944–54.

World Health Organization. WHO recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: WHO; 2018. (Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee).

Johns Hopkins Medicine. Cesarean Section. (Internet). 2022 (cited 25 April 2024). Available from: https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/cesarean-section

World Health Organization. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division: executive summary. Geneva: WHO; 2019 (cited 2024 Aug 10). Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/327596

Mittal P, Pandey D, Suri J, Bharti R. Trend prediction for cesarean deliveries based on Robson classification system at a tertiary referral unit of North India. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020;70:111–8.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:179–93.

Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM, et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:326.e1–10.

World Health Organization. Recommendations: intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

World Health Organization. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. Geneva: WHO; 2015 (cited 2024 Apr 25). Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RH

Oladapo OT, Diaz V, Bonet M, et al. Cervical dilatation patterns of ‘low-risk’ women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125:944–54.

Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1281–7.

Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e323–33.

Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29:7–18.

Dupont C, Carayol M, Le Ray C, et al. Oxytocin administration during spontaneous labour: guidelines for clinical practice. Guidelines short text. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017;45:56–61.

Abalos E, Oladapo OT, Chamillard M, et al. Duration of spontaneous labour in ‘low-risk’ women with ‘normal’ perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;223:123–32.

Vogel JP, Comrie-Thomson L, Pingray V, et al. Usability, acceptability, and feasibility of the World Health Organization Labour Care Guide: a mixed-methods, multicountry evaluation. Birth. 2021;48:66–75.

Pingray V, Bonet M, Berrueta M, et al. The development of the WHO Labour Care Guide: an international survey of maternity care providers. Reprod Health. 2021;18:66.