COMPARISON OF STRAIN ELASTOGRAPHY AND SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY FOR DIFFERENTIATING MALIGNANT FROM BENIGN BREAST MASSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2022i1.148Keywords:
Shear wave elastography, strain elastography, benign breast lesion, malignant breast lesionAbstract
To compare the diagnostic performance of shear wave and strain elastography in distinguishing benign and malignant breast lesions. A prospective study carried out from 20th March 2020 to 20th March 2021 at department of Radiology of Sahiwal, Multan, Lahore. The study included women who were lined for surgical excision or core needle biopsy and were examined using B-mode ultrasound and shear and strain wave elastography. A total of 30 female patients with 40 breast lesions were included in the study. Lesions were categorized on B-mode ultrasound as 3 BI-RADS 3, 18 BI-RADS 4A, 5 BI-RADS 4B, 7 BI-RADS 4C, and 7 BI-RADS 5. After performing a B-mode Ultrasound examination, US elastography was done. A 14-MHz transducer was used to obtain high-resolution images. For comparing the diagnostic performance of both, an area under the ROI curve (AUC) from data sets of shear and strain wave elastography was compared. The McNemar test was used for the comparison of sensitivity and specificity of both data sets. Mean age of the participants was 48.4 years (21-80years). 24 out of 40 lesions were benign while 16 were malignant. B mode US imaging showed the diameter of the lesion ranged from 0.5 to 5.2 cm. There was no significant difference between specificity and sensitivity of elastographic images. 6 breast masses showed discrepant results. After category 4a BI-RADs were selectively downgraded on the bases of cutoff values, AUCs showed improvement. Diagnostic performance of shear wave and strain elastography in distinguishing malignant and benign lesions is the same. Combining both has better diagnostic performance than using each individually.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, A. T. (2020). Diagnostic utility of strain and shear wave ultrasound elastography in differentiation of benign and malignant solid breast lesions. Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine51, 1-8.
Barr, R. G. (2017). Foreword to the second set of WFUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology43, 1-3.
Barr, R. G. (2019). Future of breast elastography. Ultrasonography38, 93.
Barr, R. G. (2020). Breast elastography. Tissue Elasticity Imaging, 21-46.
Barr, R. G., and Zhang, Z. (2015). Shear-wave elastography of the breast: value of a quality measure and comparison with strain elastography. Radiology275, 45-53.
Berg, W. A., Cosgrove, D. O., Doré, C. J., Schäfer, F. K., Svensson, W. E., Hooley, R. J., Ohlinger, R., Mendelson, E. B., Balu-Maestro, C., and Locatelli, M. (2012). Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology262, 435-449.
Brusseau, E., Detti, V., Coulon, A., Maissiat, E., Boublay, N., Berthezene, Y., Fromageau, J., Bush, N., and Bamber, J. (2014). In vivo response to compression of 35 breast lesions observed with a two-dimensional locally regularized strain estimation method. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology40, 300-312.
Cantisani, V., David, E., Barr, R. G., Radzina, M., de Soccio, V., Elia, D., De Felice, C., Pediconi, F., Gigli, S., and Occhiato, R. (2021). US-elastography for breast lesion characterization: prospective comparison of US BIRADS, strain elastography and shear wave elastography. Ultraschall in der Medizin-European Journal of Ultrasound42, 533-540.
Chamming's, F., Mesurolle, B., Antonescu, R., Aldis, A., Kao, E., Thériault, M., Omeroglu, A., Pinel-Giroux, F., Seidler, M., and Solorzano, S. (2019). Value of shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant microcalcifications of the breast. American Journal of Roentgenology213, W85-W92.
Chang, J. M., Won, J.-K., Lee, K.-B., Park, I. A., Yi, A., and Moon, W. K. (2013). Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. American Journal of Roentgenology201, W347-W356.
Chou, S.-H. S., Baikpour, M., Zhang, W., Mercaldo, S. F., Lehman, C. D., and Samir, A. E. (2021). Shear-wave elastography of the breast: impact of technical image quality parameters on diagnostic accuracy. American Journal of Roentgenology216, 1205-1215.
Liu, H., Xu, G., Yao, M.-H., Pu, H., Fang, Y., Xiang, L.-H., and Wu, R. (2018). Association of conventional ultrasound, elastography and clinicopathological factors with axillary lymph node status in invasive ductal breast carcinoma with sizes> 10 mm. Oncotarget9, 2819.
Suvannarerg, V., Chitchumnong, P., Apiwat, W., Lertdamrongdej, L., Tretipwanit, N., Pisarnturakit, P., Sitthinamsuwan, P., Thiravit, S., Muangsomboon, K., and Korpraphong, P. (2019). Diagnostic performance of qualitative and quantitative shear wave elastography in differentiating malignant from benign breast masses, and association with the histological prognostic factors. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery9, 386.
Youk, J. H., Son, E. J., Gweon, H. M., Kim, H., Park, Y. J., and Kim, J.-A. (2014). Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant breast lesions, combined with B-mode ultrasonography: qualitative and quantitative assessments. Ultrasound in medicine & biology40, 2336-2344.
Yu, Y., Xiao, Y., Cheng, J., and Chiu, B. (2018). Breast lesion classification based on supersonic shear-wave elastography and automated lesion segmentation from B-mode ultrasound images. Computers in Biology and Medicine93, 31-46.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Y JAMAL, S NIGHAT, R IRUM, MM KHAN, R SHEIKH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.