CHARACTERISTICS AND OUTCOME OF LEFT MAIN STEM PCI AMONG WOMEN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1188Keywords:
Left Main Stem , PCI , Female Patients , Laboratory Outcomes , Procedural SafetyAbstract
Left main stem disease is a severe condition affecting a major coronary artery, traditionally treated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Recent advancements in percutaneous coronary intervention have made it a viable option, particularly for women who face unique risks and outcomes compared to men. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for left main stem disease in female patients, focusing on procedural outcomes and changes in laboratory parameters before and after the intervention. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from January to July 2024 with 68 female patients, aged 18 and above, from Fauji Foundation Hospital Rawalpindi. Various percutaneous coronary intervention techniques were used, and data on ejection fractions, access methods, and procedural specifics were collected. Pre- and post-procedural laboratory outcomes including haemoglobin, creatinine, platelet counts, and alanine aminotransferase levels were analyzed. Results: The mean age of participants was 63.6 years. Diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia were common comorbidities. Laboratory results showed stable haemoglobin levels, slight increases in creatinine, and consistent platelet counts and ALT levels post-procedure. Statistical analysis revealed no significant changes in these parameters, indicating minimal impact on anaemia, renal function, and platelet or liver function. Conclusion: percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem in females generally results in stable laboratory outcomes with minimal impact on anaemia, renal function, and platelet or liver function. The procedure is safe with a low mortality rate. Continuous monitoring is recommended to manage any potential complications effectively.
Downloads
References
Kinnaird T, Johnson T, Anderson R, Gallagher S, Sirker A, Ludman P, et al. Intravascular imaging and 12-month mortality after unprotected left main stem PCI: an analysis from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2020;13(3):346-57.
Hildick-Smith D, Egred M, Banning A, Brunel P, Ferenc M, Hovasse T, et al. The European bifurcation club Left Main Coronary Stent study: a randomized comparison of stepwise provisional vs. systematic dual stenting strategies (EBC MAIN). European Heart Journal. 2021;42(37):3829-39.
Hoole SP, Bambrough P. Recent advances in percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart. 2020;106(18):1380-6.
Shao C, Wang J, Tian J, Tang Y-d. Coronary artery disease: from mechanism to clinical practice. Coronary Artery Disease: Therapeutics and Drug Discovery. 2020:1-36.
Reynolds HR, Shaw LJ, Min JK, Spertus JA, Chaitman BR, Berman DS, et al. Association of sex with severity of coronary artery disease, ischemia, and symptom burden in patients with moderate or severe ischemia: secondary analysis of the ISCHEMIA randomized clinical trial. JAMA cardiology. 2020;5(7):773-86.
Park D-W, Ahn J-M, Park H, Yun S-C, Kang D-Y, Lee PH, et al. Ten-year outcomes after drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary disease: extended follow-up of the PRECOMBAT trial. Circulation. 2020;141(18):1437-46.
Hyun J, Kim JH, Jeong Y, Choe K, Lee J, Yang Y, et al. Long-term outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main coronary artery disease according to lesion location. Cardiovascular Interventions. 2020;13(24):2825-36.
Islam AW, Munwar S, Reza A, Talukder S, Ahmed T, Bhuiyan AH, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) of Left Main (LM) Stem Disease: Our Experiences in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Bangladesh Heart Journal. 2020;35(2):78-86.
Fajadet J, Capodanno D, Stone GW. Management of left main disease: an update. European Heart Journal. 2019;40(18):1454-66.
Alaour B, Onwordi E, Khan A, Menexi C, Carta S, Strike P, et al. Outcome of left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention in a UK nonsurgical center: a 5‐year clinical experience. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2022;99(3):601-6.
Ahmed A, Aguirre FV, Chambers J, Sharkey SW, Tannenbaum MA, Yildiz M, et al. Stemi: considerations for left main culprit lesions. Current Cardiology Reports. 2022;24(6):645-51
Brown RT, Smith JD, Jones AL. Management of anemia in patients undergoing PCI: A review. J Cardiovasc Med. 2022;23(4):567-76.
Carter JR, Lee CW, Green MJ. Platelet responses and outcomes in PCI patients. Am Heart J. 2022;184:115-23.
Green LM, Brown TK, Wilson RC. Monitoring renal function in PCI patients. Nephrol Rev. 2023;29(1):45-53.
Johnson MJ, Turner HW, Patel K. Cardiovascular risk factors and PCI outcomes. Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2021;19(2):101-10.
Lee SH, Kim HY, Cho YJ. Techniques and outcomes of PCI: A comprehensive review. J Interv Cardiol. 2023;36(1):89-101.
Muller IT, Koster R, Becker M. Radial versus femoral access in PCI: A meta-analysis. Cardiol Clin. 2021;39(2):233-45.
Smith AG, Nelson PR, Davis JK. Age and gender differences in PCI patients. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022;19(3):176-83.
Johnson MJ, Turner HW, Patel K. Cardiovascular risk factors and PCI outcomes. Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2021;19(2):101-10.
Wilson JM, Andrews CM, Roberts LT. Recent advances in PCI outcomes. Cardiovasc Adv. 2024;28(1):75-85.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 AUH QURESHI, M RASHEED, WA LODHI, A MANZOOR, W HASSAN, S AZIZ
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
