PERCEPTION OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS ABOUT DIDECTIC TEACHING AMONG PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES

Authors

  • M BIBI Department Of Nursing, The Superior University Lahore, Pakistan
  • H SADDIQUE Department Of Nursing, The Superior University Lahore, Pakistan
  • R JABEEN Department Of Nursing, The Superior University Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1184

Keywords:

Didactic Teaching, Interactive Teaching, Public Colleges, Private Colleges, Student Perception, Teacher Perception

Abstract

Didactic teaching remains the dominant pedagogical approach in many educational institutions worldwide, including Pakistan. This study aimed to assess and compare the perceptions of students and teachers regarding didactic teaching in public and private colleges in Lahore, Pakistan. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted from January to July 2024, involving 152 participants (95 students and 57 teachers) from public and private colleges in Lahore. Participants were selected using stratified random sampling. Data were collected through a structured, pre-tested questionnaire assessing demographic characteristics, perceptions of didactic teaching, and preferences for interactive teaching methods. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0. Chi-square and t-tests were employed to compare perceptions between groups, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The majority of teachers (68.4%) favored didactic teaching, particularly for syllabus coverage in limited timeframes. In contrast, only 42.1% of students found didactic teaching effective, with significant differences between public (54%) and private (36.4%) college students (p < 0.05). Furthermore, 70.5% of students preferred interactive teaching methods such as group discussions and problem-solving activities, compared to 36.8% of teachers (p < 0.05). Private college participants, both students and teachers, showed a higher preference for interactive methods compared to their public counterparts (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study highlights a significant divide between students' and teachers' perceptions of didactic teaching in public and private colleges. While teachers, particularly in public colleges, defend didactic teaching as efficient, students, especially in private colleges, express a clear preference for interactive methods. These findings suggest the need for reforms in Pakistan’s higher education system to integrate more interactive teaching approaches while maintaining the efficiency of didactic methods, especially in public institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Darling-Hammond L, Hyler ME, Gardner M. Effective teacher professional development. Learning policy institute. 2017.

Stronge JH. Qualities of effective teachers: Ascd; 2018.

Albhnsawy AA. Fostering pedagogical content knowledge through integrating digital lectures with teaching for undergraduate Science teachers. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies. 2020;11(1):9-17.

Leinhardt G. On teaching. Advances in instructional psychology: Routledge; 2019. p. 1-54.

Nilson LB. Teaching at its best: A research-based resource for college instructors: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.

Collins A, Brown JS, Newman SE. Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. Knowing, learning, and instruction: Routledge; 2018. p. 453-94.

Kahembe J, Jackson L. Tanzanian Education and the Purposes of Assessment. Educational Assessment in Tanzania: A Sociocultural Perspective: Springer; 2020. p. 17-35.

Moate RM, Cox JA. Learner-Centered Pedagogy: Considerations for Application in a Didactic Course. Professional Counselor. 2015;5(3):379-89.

Oermann MH, Gaberson KB, De Gagne JC. Evaluation and testing in nursing education: Springer Publishing Company; 2024.

Su JJ, Masika GM, Paguio JT, Redding SR. Defining compassionate nursing care. Nursing ethics. 2020;27(2):480-93.

Black B. Professional nursing-e-book: concepts & challenges: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2022.

Coventry TH, Maslin‐Prothero SE, Smith G. Organizational impact of nurse supply and workload on nurses continuing professional development opportunities: an integrative review. Journal of advanced nursing. 2015;71(12):2715-27.

Molassiotis A, Wang T, Hoang HTX, Tan J-Y, Yamamoto-Mitani N, Cheng KF, et al. Doctoral nursing education in east and Southeast Asia: characteristics of the programs and students’ experiences of and satisfaction with their studies. BMC medical education. 2020;20:1-12.

MEBARKI A. INTRODUCTION TO DIDACTICS: A COURSE FOR THIRD-YEAR LICENCE LEVEL. 2023.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-09

How to Cite

BIBI, M., SADDIQUE, H., & JABEEN, R. (2024). PERCEPTION OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS ABOUT DIDECTIC TEACHING AMONG PUBLIC AND PRIVATE COLLEGES. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2024(1), 1184. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1184

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>