COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY

Authors

  • AGM KHAN Department of Gynae (Unit-1), Civil/SPH Hospital, Quetta, Pakistan
  • PK KAKAR Department of Gynae, Civil Hospital Quetta Balochistan, Pakistan
  • FHM AULAKH Department of Gynae, CMH Chunian, Pakistan
  • S TOFAIL Department of Cantonment General Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan
  • M BASHIR Department of Gynae & Obs, Fauji Foundation Hospital Rawalpindi, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.860

Keywords:

Ectopic Pregnancy, Methotrexate / therapeutic use, Laparoscopy/methods, Treatment Outcome

Abstract

A pregnancy that occurs in any place other than the endometrial cavity is called ectopic pregnancy. Objectives: The main aim of the study is to find a comparative analysis of medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Hospital Civil/SPH Quetta. from January 2023 to December 2023. Data was collected from 220 patients. Comprehensive clinical and demographic data were extracted from electronic medical records. These included patient age, gravidity, parity, gestational age at diagnosis, presenting symptoms, imaging results, serum β-hCG levels, treatment modalities utilised, procedural specifics, and post-intervention outcomes. Results: Data were collected from 220 patients suffering from ectopic pregnancies. The mean age of patients in the medical management group was 29.2±4.3 years, and 29.8±4.1 years in the surgical management group. Nulligravid patients were more prevalent in the medical management group (58%) compared to the surgical management group (45%), while multigravida patients were more evenly distributed between the two groups (42% vs. 55%). In comparing medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy, surgical management demonstrated a higher success rate (95%) compared to medical management (85%). Medical management with methotrexate typically resolved ectopic pregnancies within an average of 17 days, whereas surgical interventions varied in time to resolution. However, surgical management had a slightly higher complication rate (12%) than medical management (10%). Conclusion: It is concluded that both medical and surgical management options demonstrate high efficacy in resolving ectopic pregnancy, with considerations for individual patient characteristics and clinical presentations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yousefnezhad A, Pirdehghan A, Roshandel Rad M, Eskandari A, Ahmadi S. Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes between the medical and surgical treatments in tubal ectopic pregnancy. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018 Jan;16(1):31-34. PMID: 29675485; PMCID: PMC5899767.

Shiravani, Z., Atbaei, S., Jahromi, B. N., Tafti, M. H., Alamdarloo, S. M., Poordast, T., ... & Sabetian, S. (2022). Comparing four different methods for the management of ectopic pregnancy: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine, 20(3), 177.

Baggio, S., Garzon, S., Russo, A., Ianniciello, C. Q., Santi, L., Laganà, A. S., ... & Franchi, M. (2021). Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management. Archives of gynaecology and obstetrics, 303, 259-268.

Singh, S., Sandhu, N., Singh, S., Kumar, P., & Aziz, A. (2020). Comparison between laparoscopy and laparotomy in the management of ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 9(2), 706.

Ozcan, M. C., Wilson, J. R., & Frishman, G. N. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy with salpingectomy versus salpingostomy. Journal of minimally invasive gynaecology, 28(3), 656-667.

Boychuk, A. V., Khlibovska, O. I., & Yakymchuk, Y. B. (2020). Ectopic pregnancy and its long-term results. Wiad Lek, 73(1), 139-144.

Yu, J., Peng, Y., Yu, L., & Shi, S. (2024). Laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy: A comparative study on the clinical benefits and impact on tubal patency and reproductive outcomes. Technology and Health Care, (Preprint), 1-10.

Naveed, A. K., Anjum, M. U., Hassan, A., & Mahmood, S. N. (2022). Methotrexate versus expectant management in ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1-7.

Roche, C., McDonnell, R., Tucker, P., Jones, K., Milward, K., McElhinney, B., ... & Maouris, P. (2020). Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: evolution from medical to surgical management. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 60(6), 852-857.

Roche, C., McDonnell, R., Tucker, P., Jones, K., Milward, K., McElhinney, B., ... & Maouris, P. (2020). Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: evolution from medical to surgical management. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 60(6), 852-857.

Xiao, C., Shi, Q., Cheng, Q., & Xu, J. (2021). Non-surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine, 100(50), e27851.

Hao, H. J., Feng, L., Dong, L. F., Zhang, W., & Zhao, X. L. (2023). Reproductive outcomes of ectopic pregnancy with conservative and surgical treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine, 102(17), e33621.

Arda Düz, S. (2021). Fertility outcomes after medical and surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Acta Clinica Croatica, 60(3.), 347-352.

Aydın, G. A., Özgen, G., & Yavuz, A. (2020). Comparative study of low‐dose versus standard single‐dose methotrexate: A novel approach for medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 46(2), 286-292.

Tsakiridis, I., Giouleka, S., Mamopoulos, A., Athanasiadis, A., & Dagklis, T. (2020). Diagnosis and management of ectopic pregnancy: a comparative review of major national guidelines. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 75(10), 611-623.

Karuserci, Ö. K., & Sucu, S. (2020). Retrospective evaluation of patients treated for ectopic pregnancy: experience of a tertiary centre. Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, 42(12), 800-804.

Karavani, G., Gutman-Ido, E., Herzberg, S., Chill, H. H., Cohen, A., & Dior, U. P. (2021). Recurrent tubal ectopic pregnancy management and the risk of a third ectopic pregnancy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 28(8), 1497-1502.

Malhotra, R., Patel, R., Gill, K., Brandi, K. M., & Merchant, A. M. (2022). Socioeconomic analysis of the surgical management of ectopic pregnancies: an analysis of the national inpatient sample. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 29(5), 641-648.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-19

How to Cite

KHAN, . A., KAKAR, . P., AULAKH, . F., TOFAIL, . S., & BASHIR, . M. (2024). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 2024(1), 860. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.860