ROLE OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR AND WELFARE IN LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT

HA SAEED; MJ HAIDER; TS ANSARI; A FATIMA; A KHALID; MA Gilani; M SALEEM; M SHOAIB; M SARMAD; M AHMAR; A SAKHAWAT

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.442

Authors

HA SAEED Department of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, College of Animal Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China
MJ HAIDER Department of Biotechnology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
TS ANSARI Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
A FATIMA Department of Veterinary Surgery, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
A KHALID Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan
MA Gilani Department of Meat Science and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
M SALEEM Institute of Agriculture Extension, Education and Rural Development, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan
M SHOAIB Department of Animal Nutrition, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Pakistan
M SARMAD Faculty of Animal Husbandry, Institute of Animal Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan
M AHMAR Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan
A SAKHAWAT Department of Meat Science and Technology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.442

Keywords:

Animal behavior, livestock, farms, feedlots, poultry houses

Abstract

Animal behavior and welfare play pivotal roles in livestock production and management, shaping the well-being of animals and the industry's overall success. The primary aim of the study is to find the role of animal behaviour and welfare in livestock production and management. The comprehensive study was conducted at University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences Lahore from November 2021 to January 2022. Behavioral data were collected from various livestock species, including cattle, poultry, pigs, and sheep. Observations were made in various settings, such as farms, feedlots, and poultry houses, to capture a comprehensive view of animal behavior. A total of 220 animals were included in the research. Observations revealed that cattle exhibited grazing behaviors for an average of 6 hours daily, while poultry engaged in frequent feeding bouts totaling 10 hours daily. Pigs and sheep displayed flexible feeding behaviors with an average of 8 hours per day, consistent with earlier findings. It is concluded that this study plays a pivotal role in animal behavior and welfare in livestock production and management. Understanding and accommodating natural behaviors, mitigating environmental stressors, and adhering to ethical guidelines contribute to healthier, more contented livestock.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fernández-Gil, A., Naves, J., Ordiz, A., Quevedo, M., Revilla, E., and Delibes, M. (2016). Conflict misleads large carnivore management and conservation: brown bears and wolves in Spain. PLoS ONE 11:e0151541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151541

Forbes, J. M. (2007). A personal view of how ruminant animals control their intake and choice of food: minimal total discomfort. Nutr. Res. Rev. 20, 132–146. doi: 10.1017/S0954422407797834

Gallo, C. B., & Huertas, S. M. (2016). Main animal welfare problems in ruminant livestock during preslaughter operations: a South American view. Animal, 10(2), 357-364. doi: 10.1017/S1751731115001597.

Gallo, C., Tarumán, J., & Larrondo, C. (2018). Main factors affecting animal welfare and meat quality in lambs for slaughter in Chile. Animals, 8(10), 165. doi: 10.3390/ani8100165. PMID: 30262753; PMCID: PMC6210305.

Garde, M., and Meuret, M. (2017). Quand les Loups Franchissent la Lisière :ExpériencesD'éleveurs, Chasseurs et AutresRésidents de Seyne-les-Alpes Confrontés Aux Loups. Rapp. (Montpellier: CERPAM & INRA Selmet), 116.

Guesgen, M. J., Beausoleil, N. J., Minot, E. O., Stewart, M., Stafford, K. J., and Morel, P. C. H. (2016). Lambs show changes in ear posture when experiencing pain. Anim. Welfare. 25, 171–177. doi: 10.7120/09627286.25.2.171

Hamzaoui, S., Salama, A. A. K., Albanell, E., Such, X., and Caja, G. (2013) Physiological responses lactational performances of late-lactation dairy goats under heat stress conditions. J. Dairy Sci. 96, 6355–6365. doi: 10.3168/jds.2013-6665

Heleski, C. R., Mertig, A. G., & Zanella, A. J. (2004). Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: A national survey of animal science faculty members. Journal of Animal Science, 82(9), 2806-2814. 10.2527/2004.8292806x

Juhnke, J., Miller, J., Hall, J. O., Provenza, F. D., and Villalba, J. J. (2012). Preference for condensed tannins by sheep in response to challenge infection with Haemonchuscontortus. Vet. Parasitol. 188, 104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.02.015

Laporte, I., Muhly, T. B., Pitt, J. A., Alexander, M., and Musiani, M. (2010). Effects of wolves on elk and cattle behaviors: implications for livestock production and wolf conservation. PLoS ONE 5:e11954. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011954

Lescureux, N., Garde, L., and Meuret, M. (2018). “Considering wolves as active agents in understanding stakeholders perceptions and developing management strategies,” in Large Carnivore Conservation and Management: Human Dimensions, ed. T. Hovardas (Routledge: London), 147–167. doi: 10.4324/9781315175454-8

Li, X., Zito, S., Sinclair, M., & Phillips, C. J. (2018). Perception of animal welfare issues during Chinese transport and slaughter of livestock by a sample of stakeholders in the industry. PLoS One, 13(6), e0197028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197028.

Ling, R. Z., Zulkifli, I., Lampang, P. N., Nhiem, D. V., Wang, Y., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2016). Attitudes of students from south-east and east Asian countries to slaughter and transport of livestock. Animal Welfare, 25(3), 377-387.

Lomax, S., Dickson, H., Sheil, M., and Windsor, P. A. (2010). Topical anaesthesia alleviates short-term pain of castration and tail docking in lambs. Aust. Vet. J. 88, 67–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2009.00546.x

Macdonald, K. A., Penno, J. W., Lancaster, J. A. S., and Roche, J. R. (2008). Effect of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production, and reproduction of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. J. Dairy Sci. 91, 2151–2163. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0630

Martínez-Ortiz-de-Montellano, C., Vargas-Magaña, J. J., Canul-Ku, H. L., Miranda-Soberanis, R., Capetillo-Leal, C., Sandoval-Castro, C. A., et al. (2010). Effect of a tropical tannin-rich plant Lysilomalatisiliquum on adult populations of Haemonchuscontortus in sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 172, 283–290. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.04.040

Orihuela A. Review: Management of livestock behavior to improve welfare and production. Animal. 2021;15 Suppl 1:100290. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100290.

Rohlf, V. I., Bennett, P. C., Toukhsati, S., & Coleman, G. (2012). Beliefs underlying dog owners' health care behaviors: results from a large, self-selected, internet sample. Anthrozoös, 25(2), 171-185.

Temple, D., & Manteca, X. (2020). Animal welfare in extensive production systems is still an area of concern. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 545902, https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.545902.

Wu, T. (2018). The socioeconomic and ecological drivers of avian influenza risks in China and at the international level. Arizona State University.