DETERMINE PRE-ANALYTICAL ERRORS ' PERCENTAGE IN CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY LABS AND DEVELOP REMEDIAL PROCEDURES FOR THEIR PREVENTION

R NAWAZ; S BASHIR; S YASMEEN

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.419

Authors

R NAWAZ Master of Science in Nursing (MSN), Nishter Hospital, Multan, Pakistan
S BASHIR Master of Science in Nursing (MSN), Nishter Hospital, Multan, Pakistan
S YASMEEN Master of Science in Nursing (MSN), Nishter Hospital, Multan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2023i1.419

Keywords:

Laboratory Errors, Pre-Analytical Errors, Analytical Errors, Post-Analytical Errors, Total Testing Process.

Abstract

Diagnostic inaccuracies pose a formidable issue in Laboratory Medicine, necessitating immediate initiatives to expand understanding and minimize these discrepancies. Our study delves into the nuances of errors associated with laboratory testing processes, from the test request to result interpretation, underlining the imperative for reducing such errors. Our investigation seeks to identify the incidence of errors in a round-the-clock lab setting over four months, covering pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases.Over a span period from Jan 2021 to Jan 2022, a broad spectrum of errors within pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases was methodically logged using a bespoke proforma. The collected data was systematically analyzed utilizing SPSS version 22.All venous and arterial blood samples were processed in the 24-hour lab throughout this period. From the 185,012 samples received, 2,450 were deemed unsuitable for testing, accounting for a 1.32% rejection rate. These samples were disqualified due to an array of pre-analytical errors, including misidentification (0.07%), incorrect tube usage (0.11%), missing samples (0.07%), drawing from an intravenous site (0.10%), inadequate sample volume (0.51%), improper timing of sample collection (0.10%), hemolysed samples (0.31%), and lipemic samples (0.11%).Utilizing an agreed list of evidence-based Quality Indicators, compliant with the current International Standard (ISO 15189:2012), for incorporation into accreditation programs of clinical laboratories stands as a potent approach to augment quality, mitigate error risks, and bolster patient safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Calmarza, P., and Cordero, J. (2011). Lipemia interferences in routine clinical biochemical tests. Biochemia medica 21, 160-166.

Da Rin, G. (2009). Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducing laboratory errors. Clinica chimica acta 404, 68-74.

Fidler, J. R. (2007). Task analysis revisited: Refining the phlebotomy technician scope of practice and assessing longitudinal change in competencies. Evaluation & the health professions 30, 150-169.

Gray, J. E., Suresh, G., Ursprung, R., Edwards, W. H., Nickerson, J., Shiono, P. H., Plsek, P., Goldmann, D. A., and Horbar, J. (2006). Patient misidentification in the neonatal intensive care unit: quantification of risk. Pediatrics 117, e43-e47.

Hamid, I., Pai, V. R., and Sheriff, M. (2023). Pre-analytical errors in clinical biochemistry-a comparative study. International Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Research 6, 182-189.

Hughes, D. (2006). Root cause analysis: bridging the gap between ideas and execution. Washington DC, USA: National Centre for Patient Safety Topics in Patient Safety, 1-2.

Jagannatha, D. S. B., Chandrakar, D. S., and Durg, C. (2019). Study of Pre-Analytical Errors in a Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory: The Hidden Flaws in Total Testing. Galore International Journal of Health Sciences and Research 4.

Koseoglu, M., Hur, A., Atay, A., and Cuhadar, S. (2011). Effects of hemolysis interference on routine biochemistry parameters. Biochemia medica 21, 79-85.

Lee, A. C., Leung, M., and So, K. (2005). Managing patients with identical names in the same ward. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 18, 15-23.

Lippi, G., Salvagno, G. L., Montagnana, M., Franchini, M., and Guidi, G. C. (2006). Phlebotomy issues and quality improvement in results of laboratory testing. Clinical laboratory 52, 217-230.

Peter, T. F., Rotz, P. D., Blair, D. H., Khine, A.-A., Freeman, R. R., and Murtagh, M. M. (2010). Impact of laboratory accreditation on patient care and the health system. American journal of clinical pathology 134, 550-555.

Pfützner, A., Schipper, C., Ramljak, S., Flacke, F., Sieber, J., Forst, T., and Musholt, P. B. (2013). Evaluation of the effects of insufficient blood volume samples on the performance of blood glucose self-test meters. Journal of diabetes science and technology 7, 1522-1529.

Plebani, M. (2009). Exploring the iceberg of errors in laboratory medicine. Clinica chimica acta 404, 16-23.

Plebani, M. (2012). Quality indicators to detect pre-analytical errors in laboratory testing. The Clinical Biochemist Reviews 33, 85.

Plebani, M. (2013). The CCLM contribution to improvements in quality and patient safety. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) 51, 39-46.

Prasad, P., Kumar, R., and Kumari, R. (2019). Pre-analytical errors in clinical chemistry laboratory of a tertiary care hospital.

Rachana, G., and Manjunatha, R. (2019). A study on identifying the pre-analytical phase errors leading to biochemistry and hematology sample rejection by using fmea & paretos principle. Int. J. Adv. Res 7, 811-820.

Sharma, N. K., Akhtar, M., Pandey, N., Singh, R., and Singh, A. (2017). Sex specific seasonal variation in hematological and serum biochemical indices of Barilius bendelisis from Central Himalaya, India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences 87, 1185-1197.

Sushma, B., and Shrikant, C. (2019). Study on “pre-analytical errors in a clinical biochemistry laboratory”: the hidden flaws in total testing. Biochem Anal Biochem 8, 2161-1009.19.