Efficacy and Safety of Supracostal Puncture in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i11.2100Keywords:
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, supracostal puncture, renal stones, stone-free rate, postoperative complicationsAbstract
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard treatment for large renal stones. The supracostal puncture approach offers improved access to the upper calyces and may enhance stone clearance, but concerns remain regarding thoracic and bleeding complications. Local data evaluating the efficacy and safety of supracostal PCNL in Pakistan are limited. Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of supracostal puncture in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods: This descriptive study was conducted at the Department of Urology, Shaikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore, over six months, from 11 April to 11 October. A total of 100 patients aged 20–70 years undergoing supracostal PCNL were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling. Efficacy was defined as complete stone clearance on KUB CT at 4 weeks. Safety outcomes included bleeding, haematuria, pneumothorax, and overall complications graded according to the Clavien Dindo classification. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Stratification was performed, and chi-square tests were applied with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. Results: The mean age was 45.8 ± 12.6 years, with male predominance (68%). Stone-free status was achieved in 78% of patients. Overall complications occurred in 31%, with bleeding being the most frequent (27%), followed by haematuria (9%) and pneumothorax (3%). Most complications were Clavien Dindo Grade I or II, while Grade IIIa complications occurred in 3% of patients. No Grade IIIb or higher complications were observed. Stratification analysis showed that efficacy was significantly higher in patients with a stone size <3 cm, shorter stone duration, single stones, and no diabetes mellitus. Postoperative bleeding was significantly associated with stone size ≥3 cm, longer stone duration, and diabetes mellitus. Conclusion: Supracostal puncture PCNL is an effective and relatively safe approach for the management of renal stones when performed in appropriately selected patients, with acceptable complication rates and favorable stone clearance outcomes.
Downloads
References
Saeed S., Arshad Z., Batool A., Memon M., Naeem Q., & Habib S. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for renal stones. PJMHS 2022;16(1):1276-1278. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs221611276
Zhou G., Zhou Y., Chen R., Wang D., Zhou S., Jiao Z.et al.. The influencing factors of infectious complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis 2022;51(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01376-5
Marei M., Hashem S., Salem E., & Mohamed D.Supracostal puncture versus subcostal puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine 2022;89(1):5691-5697. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2022.266030
Kunwar A., Upadhyaya A., Tiwari K., Shrestha S., Yadav C., Dangol B.et al.. Thoracic complications in supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Journal of Nepal Health Research Council 2022;20(02):361-365. https://doi.org/10.33314/jnhrc.v20i02.3950
Chow A., Ogawa S., Seigel C., Sands K., Vetter J., Desai A.et al.. Evaluation of perirenal anatomic landmarks on computed tomography to reduce the risk of thoracic complications during supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology 2021;35(5):589-595. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0551
Şahan A., Çubuk A., Özkaptan O., Ertaş K., Çanakçı C., Eryıldırım B.et al.. Safety of upper pole puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the guidance of ultrasonography versus fluoroscopy: a comparative study. Urologia Internationalis 2020;104(9-10):769-774. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509448
Ibrahim M., Daniswara N., Santosa A., Soedarso M., Nugroho E., Wibisono D.et al.. The effectiveness and safety of supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a single-center tertiary hospital. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 2023;11(B):326-329. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11367
Liu L., Yue X., Xiao Y., & Wang Q. Safety and efficacy of enhanced recovery after surgery among patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2023;13(10):e074455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074455
Ali M., Naeem Q., Zafar U., Abbas A., Muhammad F., Naqash M.et al.. Outcomes and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a single-center experience. Cureus 2024. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69567
Rashid A., Mahmood S., Amin A., Bapir R., & Buchholz N.Multitract percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of staghorn stones. African Journal of Urology 2020;26(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-020-00086-x
Khan M., Ullah N., Mohayuddin N., Haroon N., & Nawaz A. Safety of supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy in paediatric population: a single centre experience. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College 2022;26(1):34-37. https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v26i1.1687
Shaikh N., Kumar J., Samad A., Hafeez A., Jamshaid A., & Zaidi S. Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as safe and effective in children as adults?. PJMHS 2023;17(5):590-593. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2023175590
Marei M., Hashem S., Salem E., & Mohamed D.Supracostal puncture versus subcostal puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine 2022;89(1):5691-5697. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2022.266030
Kırlı E., Erdal F., Özman O., Özalp A., Selçuk B., & Önal B.. The efficacy of Guy's stone score for predicting the stone-free and complication rates in children treated by percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Journal of Endourology 2020;34(2):128-133. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0127
Ekkasak S., Cherntanomwong P., Phengsalae Y., & Ketsuwan C. Massive haemothorax from percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a case report. International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 2023;106:108251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.108251
Biswas N., Mm R., Arafuzzaman K., Mm U., & Mn A.. Safety & efficacy of supracostal access for PCNL: nikdu experience. Bangladesh Journal of Urology 2020; 21(2):140-144. https://doi.org/10.3329/bju.v21i2.49893
Şahan A., Çubuk A., Özkaptan O., Ertaş K., Çanakçı C., Eryıldırım B.et al.. Safety of upper pole puncture in percutaneous nephrolithotomy with the guidance of ultrasonography versus fluoroscopy: a comparative study. Urologia Internationalis 2020; 104(9-10):769-774. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509448
Hasan M., Rahman M., Hossain M., Kabir M., Rashid M., Arafuzzaman K.et al.. Outcome of PCNL by supracostal approach for staghorn stone in comparison with infracostal approach. Bangladesh Journal of Urology 2022; 24(2):193-199. https://doi.org/10.3329/bju.v24i2.59494
Thakker P., Mithal P., Dutta R., Carreno G., & Gutiérrez-Aceves J. Comparative outcomes and cost of ambulatory PCNL in select kidney stone patients. Urolithiasis 2022;51(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-022-01392-5
Rachman R., Birowo P., Nurullah G., Cho P., Atmoko W., Widyahening I.et al.. General versus spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000research 2023;12:281. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.124704.1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ahmed Wahaj, Abdul Rauf, Fazal Ur Rehman Khan, Muhammad Hamza Azhar, Nuzhat Faqir Hussain, Muhammad Yahya Hasan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

