Comparison of Recurrence Rate of Pterygium Following Excision by Bare Sclera Technique with and without Conjunctival Autograft – A Hospital-based Study

Authors

  • Khurram Rafiq Department of Ophthalmology, Divisional Headquarter Teaching Hospital, Mirpur, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan
  • Madasar Muneer Department of Ophthalmology, Muhammadi Eye Hospital, Mirpur, Pakistan
  • Waseem Ahmed Khan Department of Ophthalmology, Divisional Headquarter Teaching Hospital, Mirpur, Azad Kashmir, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.2085

Keywords:

Pterygium, conjunctival autograft, bare sclera, recurrence

Abstract

Pterygium is a common ocular surface disorder in Pakistan, driven by high ultraviolet exposure and environmental irritants. Recurrence following surgical excision remains a major clinical challenge. While the bare sclera technique is widely performed due to its simplicity, conjunctival autografting has been proposed to reduce recurrence. This study compared postoperative recurrence between bare sclera excision and conjunctival autografting. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Ophthalmology Department of Ibn-e-Sina Hospital in Multan from September 2024 to February 2025. One hundred and twenty-eight patients aged 15–65 years with primary pterygium were enrolled through consecutive sampling. Participants were randomized into two equal groups: Group A underwent pterygium excision using the bare sclera technique, while Group B underwent excision followed by conjunctival autograft placement. Patients were evaluated clinically at 1 day, 1 week, and monthly for six months. Recurrence was defined as fibrovascular regrowth across the limbus. Data were analyzed with SPSS version 23, using chi-square and independent t-tests, with p ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age was 42.6 ± 11.3 years, and females constituted 54.7% of the cohort. Most participants (64.1%) had symptoms for 3–6 months. Recurrence was significantly higher in the bare sclera group (21.9%) than in the autograft group (12.5%). No statistically significant relationship was observed between recurrence and patient age (p = 0.21), gender (p = 0.63), or symptom duration (p = 0.12). Thus, the surgical method was the primary determinant of the recurrence rate. Conclusion: Conjunctival autografting was superior to the bare sclera technique in reducing the recurrence of pterygium following excision. These findings reinforce the need to adopt autograft-based approaches in high-risk settings such as Pakistan to improve patient outcomes and minimize repeat surgery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhikari P. and Joshi S. Outcome of inferonasal conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery. Nepal Medical College Journal 2021;23(4):319-323. https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v23i4.42223

Costa F., Costa R., Barbosa J., & Gomes J. Pterygium surgery with conjunctival autograft fixation using bipolar electrocauterization. European Journal of Ophthalmology 2020;31(3):1458-1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120672120965488

Afzal S., Qamar F., Khan S., Ahmed M., Rehman S., & Qammer R. Comparison of conjunctival autograft versus bare sclera technique as treatment modalities for primary pterygium. PJMHS 2022;16(12):820-821. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs20221612820

Jamali H., Abuali M., & Khalili M. Clinical outcomes of silk versus nylon sutures for suturing of conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery. Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, 2020; 27(2):110. https://doi.org/10.4103/meajo.meajo_166_19

Alsarhani W., Alshahrani S., Showail M., Alhabdan N., Alsumari O., Almalki A., et al. Characteristics and recurrence of pterygium in Saudi Arabia: a single-center study with a long follow‐up. BMC Ophthalmology 2021;21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-021-01960-0

Yan A., Meng R., O'Doherty C., Wan L., & Gounder R. Cost-effective surgical management of pterygium: a blood-based adhesion technique substituting fibrin glue. Cureus 2024. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57786

Khairat Y., Sabry A., Khalil M., & Elrazik M. Evaluation of sutureless glueless conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery. Minia Journal of Medical Research 2022;0(0):248-257. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmr.2022.223056

Kodavoor S., Preethi V., & Dandapani R. Profile of complications in pterygium surgery - a retrospective analysis. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2021;69(7):1697-1701. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_3055_20

Elshreef O., Abdelwahab A., & Elaish M. Recurrence rate after conjunctival autograft versus intraoperative mitomycin c for treatment of primary pterygium. Journal of Recent Advances in Medicine 2020;0(0):0-0. https://doi.org/10.21608/jram.2020.42975.1084

Patel E. and Rhee M. Surgical techniques and adjuvants for the management of pterygium. Eye & Contact Lens Science & Clinical Practice 2021;48(1):3-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/icl.0000000000000849

Hussain A., Shaukat Q., & Mahmood N. Pterygium. The Professional Medical Journal 2019;26(01). https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2019.26.01.2615

Memon G., Kamil Z., Abbasi S., & Loya H. Autologous serum for fixation of limbal conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium surgery. Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology 2022;39(1). https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v39i1.1459

Afzal S., Qamar F., Khan S., Ahmed M., Rehman S., & Qammer R. Comparison of conjunctival autograft versus bare sclera technique as treatment modalities for primary pterygium. PJMHS 2022;16(12):820-821. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs20221612820

Garg P., Sahai A., Shamshad M., Tyagi L., Singhal Y., & Gupta S. A comparative study of preoperative and postoperative changes in corneal astigmatism after pterygium excision by different techniques. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2019;67(7):1036. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_1921_18

Adhikari P. and Joshi S. Outcome of inferonasal conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery. Nepal Medical College Journal 2021;23(4):319-323. https://doi.org/10.3126/nmcj.v23i4.42223

Govindasamy S. and Chandrasekhar S. Outcome of excision of primary pterygium with bare sclera technique: a study of 80 eyes in Malaysia. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences 2022;4(4):17-20. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2022.4.4.1379

Effectiveness of bare sclera technique versus conjunctival autograft transplantation for pterygium treatment. Liječnički Vjesnik 2023;145(Supp 2). https://doi.org/10.26800/lv-145-supl2-cm07

Shoaib K.. Conjunctival autograft with mitomycin c (MMC) in primary pterygium excision. Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology 2023;39(4). https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v39i4.1731

Memon G., Kamil Z., Abbasi S., & Loya H. Autologous serum for fixation of limbal conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium surgery. Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology 2022;39(1). https://doi.org/10.36351/pjo.v39i1.1459

Okonkwo S., Adebayo D., & Ogbonna I. Outcome of pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft in a tertiary hospital in southern Nigeria. Asian Journal of Medicine and Health 2022:46-51. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajmah/2022/v20i1130526

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Rafiq, K. ., Muneer, M. ., & Khan, W. A. . (2025). Comparison of Recurrence Rate of Pterygium Following Excision by Bare Sclera Technique with and without Conjunctival Autograft – A Hospital-based Study. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 6(6), 582–585. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.2085

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles