Comparative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Clipless Cholecystectomy Using Harmonic Scalpel versus Conventional Technique with Liga Clips: A Clinical Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i11.2077Keywords:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, gallstone disease, Harmonic scalpel, conventional cholecystectomy, wound infection, bile leakage, operative time, blood loss.Abstract
Gallstone disease is an increasingly prevalent global health issue. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, a minimally invasive surgical approach, ensures smaller incisions and quicker recovery. The Harmonic scalpel offers a safe and efficient tool for dissection and haemostasis, but conflicting evidence regarding its efficacy exists in the literature. Objective: To compare intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the Harmonic scalpel versus conventional clip-based cholecystectomy for managing gallbladder stones. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Nishtar Medical University/Hospital, Multan, over six months, from January 1, 2025, to June 30, 2025. A total of 120 patients were enrolled via non-probability consecutive sampling and randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A underwent clipless cholecystectomy with the Harmonic scalpel, while Group B underwent conventional clip-based cholecystectomy. Outcomes measured included operative time, gallbladder perforation, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain (Visual Analogue Scale), bile leakage, and wound infection. Follow-up assessments were conducted at 24 hours, 3 days, and 7 days postoperatively. Data were recorded on a standardized proforma and analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Results: Patients in the Harmonic scalpel group (Group A) had a mean age of 44.12±13.84 years, while the conventional group (Group B) had a mean age of 47.08±13.16 years. The Harmonic scalpel group demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (49.82±6.06 min vs. 55.43±9.39 min, p<0.001), reduced intraoperative blood loss (65.58±8.94 ml vs. 74.00±14.79 ml, p<0.001), and fewer complications, including gallbladder perforation (1.7% vs. 11.7%, p<0.05), postoperative pain (15% vs. 31.7%, p<0.05), bile leakage (8.3% vs. 21.7%, p<0.05), and wound infections (5.0% vs. 16.7%, p<0.05). Conclusion: The Harmonic scalpel demonstrates superior outcomes and fewer complications compared to conventional methods in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Its adoption may enhance surgical practices and improve patient satisfaction.
Downloads
References
Gondal I, Farooq A, Nasir M, Ayaz M, Khan S. Total laparoscopic clipless cholecystectomy by harmonic scalpels in patients with gall bladder stones. Pakistan Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2021;30(03):100-102. https://doi.org/10.51642/ppmj.v30i03.316
Kannan A, Tara A, Quadir H, Hakobyan K, Gaddam M, Ojinnaka U, et al. The outcomes of the patients undergoing harmonic scalpel laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cureus. 2021. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15622
Abounozha S, Ibrahim R, Alshahri T. Is the rate of bile leak higher in clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to conventional cholecystectomy? Ann Med Surg. 2021;62:186-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.038
Chowdhury M, Ullah M, Rahman M, Rahman S, Arefin N, Islam M. A comparative study between metal clip application and suture ligation of cystic duct in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Medicine Today. 2023;35(1):27-30. https://doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v35i1.64935
Verani L, Murateva Y, Muscat N, Dintakurti S, Shah S, Alkhazaaleh O. Comparison of current techniques for securing the cystic duct in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cureus. 2024. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75787
Khan A, Shar Z, Memon M, Zai A, Chandio S. Comparison of clipped laparoscopic cholecystectomy and clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the context of biliary leakage. PJMHS. 2023;17(1):263-265. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs2023171263
Roy D, Sheikh R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to the open procedure in patients with gallbladder disease. Avicenna J Med. 2024;14(01):003-021. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777710
Kousar N, Ghafoor M, Iqbal M, Tariq M. A clinical practice audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at our institute. J Sheikh Zayed Med Coll. 2020;11(1). https://doi.org/10.47883/jszmc.v11i01.15
Ahmed G, Ashraf I, Jabbar A, Muazzam M, Ahmed U, Ali A. Gallbladder perforation with conventional monopolar diathermy versus harmonic scalpel in laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Combined Military Hospital, Quetta. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2022;72(5):1540-1543. https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v72i5.3903
Manan D, Khan D, Ahmad I, Usman D, Jamil T, Sajid D. Comparison of clipless and clipped laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Nishtar Hospital, Multan, Pakistan. J Islamabad Med Dent Coll. 2020;9(4):275-279. https://doi.org/10.35787/jimdc.v9i4.548
Roy D, Sheikh R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy compared to the open procedure in patients with gallbladder disease. Avicenna J Med. 2024;14(01):003-021. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1777710
Pereira C, Gururaj S, Varghese B. Harmonic scalpel versus clips for ligation of cystic duct in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Cureus. 2022. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.32335
Untitled. Medpulse Int J Surg. 2019;11(1). https://doi.org/10.26611/106111
Konagaya K, Kume N, Ogino H. Duodenal ulcer perforation causing acute cholecystitis. Cureus. 2024. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.61293
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Farrukh Aftab, Shahid Hussan, Asiya Shabbir, Muhammad Rashid, Naveed Akhtar, Uzma Rasheed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

