Efficacy and Toxicity of Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using CyberKnife in Patients of Meningioma: A Single Institutional Study

Authors

  • Saima Madiha Shabbir Department of Oncology, Atomic Energy Cancer Hospital NORI (Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy Institute Islamabad, Pakistan
  • Humera Mehmood Department of Oncology, Atomic Energy Cancer Hospital NORI (Nuclear Medicine, Oncology and Radiotherapy Institute Islamabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1910

Keywords:

Brain Edema; Meningioma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Pakistan; Radiotherapy, Stereotactic; Treatment Outcome

Abstract

Meningiomas are among the most common primary intracranial tumors; while typically benign, management is challenging when lesions abut critical neurovascular structures. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with the CyberKnife® system provides a non-invasive, highly conformal alternative to surgery. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of CyberKnife-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) for meningiomas treated at a single Pakistani institution. Methods: This observational descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Oncology, NORI, Islamabad, from December 2023 to December 2024 and enrolled 39 patients with WHO grade I–II or recurrent meningiomas. Treatment modality and dose were individualized by tumor size, grade, and proximity to organs at risk. SRS was delivered in a single fraction (13–18 Gy), and FSRT in 3–5 fractions (total 21.5–30 Gy), adhering to contemporary critical-structure constraints. Efficacy was assessed clinically (symptom change) and radiologically using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria on MRI at approximately 3, 6, and 12 months. Toxicities were recorded prospectively. Descriptive statistics (counts, percentages, medians) were used to summarize baseline characteristics, disease control, and adverse events. Results: The cohort consisted of 72.7% females, with a median age of 52 years. Common locations were parafalcine (25.6%) and cerebral convexity (20.5%). Thirteen patients received SRS and 26 received FSRT. At 6 months, radiologic disease control was achieved in 91% of patients, with stable disease in 91% and a minor radiographic response in 9%. No progressive disease was observed during follow-up. Symptomatic improvement occurred in 70% of patients with headaches and/or seizures and in 20% with focal neurological deficits. Treatment was well tolerated; transient headaches consistent with radiation-related edema were managed with short-course corticosteroids, and no clinically significant late toxicities were documented. Conclusion: CyberKnife-based SRS and FSRT provided high rates of radiologic stability and meaningful symptom relief with minimal toxicity in patients with meningioma at a Pakistani tertiary center. These findings support the effectiveness and safety of CyberKnife SRT as a practical option, including in resource-constrained settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shanbhag N., Antypas C., Msaddi A., Murphy S., & Singh T. Meningioma treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using cyberknife®: first in the united arab emirates. Cureus 2022. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21821

Malone J., Gaviolli E., Doody J., Sinclair J., & Malone S.. Unresectable foramen magnum meningioma treated with CyberKnife robotic stereotactic radiosurgery. Cureus 2020. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8409

Sumaida A., Shanbhag N., & Balaraj K... Evaluating the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife for meningiomas: a systematic review. Cureus 2024. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.56848

Wang Z., Mou J., Sun D., & Liu P. Case report: upper thoracic purely extradural spinal meningioma with nerve root attachment: a case report and literature review. Frontiers in Surgery 2022;9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.918094

Song Y. and Go K... Clinical experiences using CyberKnife for large-volume meningiomas: a preliminary study. Brain Tumor Research and Treatment 2024; 12(4):230. https://doi.org/10.14791/btrt.2024.0030

Farrokhi M., Khosravifarsani A., & Begijonovich M. Sacral extradural spinal meningioma with recurrence; a case report. Immunopathologia Persa 2024. https://doi.org/10.34172/ipp.2023.40603

Grzbiela H., Nowicka E., Gawkowska‐Suwińska M., Tarnawska D., & Tarnawski R. Robotic stereotactic radiotherapy for intracranial meningiomas—an opportunity for radiation dose de-escalation. Cancers 2023; 15(22):5436. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225436

Ihwan A., Rafika R., Cangara M., Sjukur K., & Faruk M. Correlation between radiological images and histopathological type of meningioma: a cohort study. Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences 2022; 32(3). https://doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v32i3.16

Walsh K., Price M., Neff C., Komisarow J., Wimberly C., Kruchko C.et al... The joint impacts of sex and race/ethnicity on incidence of grade 1 versus grades 2–3 meningioma across the lifespan. Neuro-Oncology Advances 2023; 5(Supplement_1):i5-i12. https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdad020

Smitha H. and Sivaraman S... Prevalence of Meningioma in South Indian Population Diagnosed through Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy – A Retrospective Study. Journal of Clinical Research and Applied Medicine 2022; 1(2):63-67. https://doi.org/10.5530/jcram.1.2.15

G unadi S., Suryanti S., & Yohana R. Distribution of meningioma at Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital, Bandung, 2010–2013. Althea Medical Journal 2018;5(3):157-160. https://doi.org/10.15850/amj.v5n3.1062

Hosainey S., Bouget D., Reinertsen I., Sagberg L., Torp S., Jakola A.et al.. Are there predilection sites for intracranial meningioma? A population-based atlas. Neurosurgical Review 2021; 45(2):1543-1552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01652-9

Naeem S., Naz S., Khan A., Afridi E., Javed H., & Zahid S.. Egfr-1 expression in meningioma: insights into gender distribution and grade. Pakistan Journal of Neurological Surgery 2023; 27(3):217-224. https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v27i3.884

Cao J., Yan W., Hong X., & Yan H. Epidemiology and survival of non-malignant and malignant meningiomas in middle-aged females, 2004-2018. Frontiers in Oncology 2023; 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1157182

Shahin M., Magill S., and Ore C., Viner J., Peters P., Solomon D., et al Fertility treatment is associated with multiple meningiomas and younger age at diagnosis. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 2019; 143(1):137-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-019-03147-6

Wafa N., Sarhan A., Ebrahim A., & Balata R. Treatment outcome and survival of meningioma: a retrospective single institutional study. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine 2023; 90(2):2610-2615. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2023.286405

Owusu‐Adjei B., Lim J., Hou C., Mietus C., Daci R., Lambert W.et al.. An evidence-based framework for postoperative surveillance of meningioma. Neuro-Oncology Practice 2024;12(3):478-488. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npae117.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Shabbir, S. M. ., & Mehmood, H. . (2025). Efficacy and Toxicity of Stereotactic Radiotherapy Using CyberKnife in Patients of Meningioma: A Single Institutional Study. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 6(6), 282–286. https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1910

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles