Compliance of Anesthesia Personnel Towards Regional Anesthesia Checklist

Aneeqa  Zia; Faiqa  Hashmi; Safdar Ali  Khan

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1741

Authors

Aneeqa Zia Department of Anesthesiology, National Hospital & Medical Center, Lahore, Pakistan
Faiqa Hashmi Department of Anesthesiology, National Hospital & Medical Center, Lahore, Pakistan
Safdar Ali Khan Department of Anesthesiology, National Hospital & Medical Center, Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i6.1741

Keywords:

Checklist, Compliance, Health Personnel, Regional Anaesthesia

Abstract

Ensuring adherence to institutional protocols is crucial for minimising complications and enhancing patient safety during regional anaesthesia. Standardised checklists are endorsed globally to improve procedural compliance and promote uniformity in anaesthesia practice. Objective: To assess the compliance of anaesthetists with institutional standard practice protocols for regional anaesthesia at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Anaesthesia Department of National Hospital and Medical Centre, Lahore, from August 2024 to February 2025. A total of 83 anaesthetists were enrolled, including both consultants and postgraduate residents. A standardized pre-procedure checklist comprising 9 items was used to evaluate compliance, based on guidelines provided by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia (ASRA) and the WHO pre-block checklist. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were computed, and the chi-square test was applied to determine associations between compliance and variables such as designation and type of surgical procedure. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Overall compliance with regional anaesthesia protocols was 86%. The highest compliance rates were observed for equipment readiness (97.59%), drug labelling (95.18%), and obtaining surgical consent (93.98%). Compliance during the "time-out" phase was slightly lower at 92.77%. Consultants demonstrated a marginally higher compliance rate (88.5%) compared to postgraduate residents (84.2%). No statistically significant differences in compliance were observed based on anaesthetist designation or type of surgical procedure (p>0.05). Conclusion: High compliance with regional anaesthesia protocols was observed, particularly in equipment preparation, drug labelling, and consent verification. While consultants showed marginally better adherence than residents, overall compliance remained commendable across all practitioner levels. Continued emphasis on checklist implementation and periodic audits can further reinforce adherence to protocol.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Farag E, Mounir-Soliman L. Brown's Atlas of Regional Anaesthesia, E-Book: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2024.

Johnston D, Turbitt L. Defining success in regional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2021;76:40-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15275.

Gan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, Chung F, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, et al. Fourth consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia & Analgesia. 2020;131(2):411-48. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004833

Shams D, Sachse K, Statzer N, Gupta RK. Regional anaesthesia complications and contraindications. Clinics in sports medicine. 2022;41(2):329-43.

McCombe K, Bogod D. Regional anaesthesia: risk, consent and complications. Anaesthesia. 2021;76:18-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15246.

Warner MA, Arnal D, Cole DJ, Hammoud R, Haylock-Loor C, Ibarra P, et al. Anaesthesia patient safety: next steps to improve worldwide perioperative safety by 2030. Anaesthesia & Analgesia. 2022;135(1):6-19. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006028

Sotto KT, Burian BK, Brindle ME. Impact of the WHO surgical safety checklist relative to its design and intended use: a systematic review and meta-meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2021;233(6):794-809. e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.08.692.

Castanelli DJ, Woods JB, Chander AR, Weller JM. Trainee anaesthetist self-assessment using an entrustment scale in workplace-based assessment. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2024:0310057X241234676. 10.1177/0310057X241234676

Concha-Torre A, Alonso YD, Blanco SÁ, Allende AV, Mayordomo-Colunga J, Barrio BF. The Checklists: A Help or a Hassle? Anales de Pediatría (English Edition). 2020;93(2):135. e1-. e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpede.2020.05.003.

Looke TD, Sonesh SC, Hughes AM, Gregory ME, Pepe J, Hammer NC, et al. The pre-anaesthesia induction patient safety (PIPS) checklist: Testing dynamic versus static implementation strategies. Human Factors in Healthcare. 2024;5:100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfh.2023.100060.

O’Donoghue A, Mannion S. An Anaesthesia Checklist: A Survey of Compliance and Attitudes. Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement. 2020;8(2):69-76. 10.22038/psj.2020.48968.1275

Mulroy MF, Weller RS, Liguori GA. A checklist for performing regional nerve blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39(3):195-9. 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000075.

Azi LMTdA, Fonseca NM, Linard LG. SBA 2020: Regional anaesthesia safety recommendations update. Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia. 2020;70(4):398-418. 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.02.005

Arbizo JC, Dalal K, Lao V, Rosinia F, Adejuyigbe T. Safe preoperative regional nerve blocks. BMJ Open Quality. 2022;11(1):e001370. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001370.

Saxena S, Krombach JW, Nahrwold DA, Pirracchio R. Anaesthesia-specific checklists: A systematic review of impact. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine. 2020;39(1):65-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2019.07.011.

Muh. Audini M, Iin Aini I, Grido Handoko S. Hubungan Kepatuhan Perawat Kamar Bedah dalam Penerapan SPO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) dengan Keselamatan Pasien Operasi di Instalasi Bedah Sentral RSUD Waluyo Jati Kraksaan. An-Najat. 2023;1(4):156-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59841/an-najat.v1i4.525.

бєлка кю, кучин юл, франк мс, сіренко ів, сажин дс, фоміна г. впровадження чек-листу безпеки вооз в україні: комплаєнс медичного персоналу та інші аспекти. pain, anaesthesia & intensive care. 2022(4):13-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25284/2519-2078.4(101).2022.275111.

Fuchs A, Käser D, Theiler L, Greif R, Knapp J, Berger-Estilita J. Survival and long-term outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest in a Swiss university hospital: a prospective observational study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29(1):115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00931-0.

Turner JS, Bucca AW, Propst SL, Ellender TJ, Sarmiento EJ, Menard LM, et al. Association of checklist use in endotracheal intubation with clinically important outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(7):e209278-e. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9278

Nishisaki A, Lee A, Li S, Sanders RC, Jr., Brown CA, 3rd, Rehder KJ, et al. Sustained Improvement in Tracheal Intubation Safety Across a 15-Centre Quality-Improvement Collaborative: An Interventional Study From the National Emergency Airway Registry for Children Investigators. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(2):250-60. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004725

Fuchs A, Frick S, Huber M, Riva T, Theiler L, Kleine‐Brueggeney M, et al. Five‐year audit of adherence to an anaesthesia pre‐induction checklist. Anaesthesia. 2022;77(7):751–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15704

Jelačić S, Bowdle A, Nair B, Togashi K, Wu C, Boorman D, et al. The effects of an aviation‐style computerised pre‐induction anaesthesia checklist on pre‐anaesthetic set‐up and non‐routine events. Anaesthesia. 2019;74(9):1138–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14707

Klingberg C, Kornhall D, Gryth D, Krüger A, Lossius H, Gellerfors M. Checklists in pre‐hospital advanced airway management. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;64(1):124–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13460

Kusumaningrum P, Daryani D, Suciana F, Krismiyantara A. Impact of surgical safety checklist training on nurses’ compliance in operating room. Adv Health Sci Res. 2020;21:372–5. https://doi.org/10.2991/ahsr.k.200723.076