Comparison Between LigaSure Haemorrhoidectomy and Conventional Haemorrhoidectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i4.1710Keywords:
LigaSure, conventional methods, Hemorrhoids, OutcomesAbstract
Hemorrhoidectomy remains the gold standard for treating advanced (grade III and IV) hemorrhoids. LigaSure, a vessel-sealing technology, has emerged as an alternative to conventional excisional techniques, promising less operative trauma and improved recovery. However, comparative evidence in the local context remains limited. Objective: To evaluate the operational differences and recovery outcomes between LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy and conventional hemorrhoidectomy in patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids. Methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at Fazaia Ruth Pfau Medical College and P.N.S Shifa Hospital, Karachi, from August 1, 2023, to July 1, 2024. After approval from the institutional review board, 60 patients aged 18 to 75 years of both genders with symptomatic grade III or IV hemorrhoids requiring surgery were enrolled through non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients were allocated to undergo either LigaSure or conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Key variables assessed included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain (measured by Visual Analog Scale), complication rate, and length of hospital stay. Statistical analysis was performed using standard comparative methods with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the LigaSure group (18 ± 4.6 minutes) compared to the conventional group (33.3 ± 6.5 minutes; p < 0.0001). Intraoperative blood loss was also significantly reduced in the LigaSure group (17 ± 6.3 mL vs. 34.3 ± 9.3 mL; p < 0.0001). Postoperative pain scores were lower in the LigaSure group (2 ± 1.16) than in the conventional group (6.17 ± 1.5; p < 0.0001). The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the LigaSure group (16%) compared to the conventional group (46%; p = 0.025). Conclusion: LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy offers a superior alternative to conventional techniques, demonstrating significantly reduced operative time, lower blood loss, less postoperative pain, and fewer complications. It presents a safe and effective surgical option for managing advanced hemorrhoids.
Downloads
References
Bharucha AE, Cima RR. Anorectal diseases. Yamada's Textbook of Gastroenterology. 2022:1408-32.
Kukreja AN. Haemorrhoids: Aetiology to Management. Anorectal Disorders-From Diagnosis to Treatment: IntechOpen; 2023.
De Schepper H, Coremans G, Denis MA, Dewint P, Duinslaeger M, Gijsen I, et al. Belgian consensus guideline on the management of hemorrhoidal disease. Acta gastro-enterologica belgica-Bruxelles, 1996-2007. 2021;84(1):101-20.
Gallo G, Martellucci J, Sturiale Ae, Clerico G, Milito G, Marino F, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Techniques in coloproctology. 2020;24:145-64.
Wee IJY, Koo CH, Seow-En I, Ng YYR, Lin W, Tan EJK-W. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy for grade II/III hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of Coloproctology. 2023;39(1):3.
Chambers R, Sarno D, Roweton S. New Bipolar Electrosurgical Vessel Sealing Device Provides Improved Performance and Procedural Efficiency. Medical devices (Auckland, NZ). 2025;18:75-86.
Yu K, Li H, Xue P, Xie Z, Tang M, He H, et al. Modified ultrasound scalpel haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy for mixed haemorrhoids: a study protocol for a single-blind randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2023;24(1):140.
Gallo G, Martellucci J, Sturiale A, Clerico G, Milito G, Marino F, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Techniques in Coloproctology. 2020;24(2):145-64.
Virk AK, Kansal R, Singh C, Mehta M, Arora B, Singh A, et al. A Retrospective Study of Milligan-Morgan Versus LigaSure Hemorrhoidectomy in the Treatment of Symptomatic Hemorrhoids at an Institute in North India. Cureus. 2024;16(8):e66430.
Cheng K-C, Song L-C, Wu K-L, Chen H-H, Lee K-C. Risk factors of delayed hemorrhage after LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. BMC Surgery. 2022;22(1):361.
Yurtkal A, Canday M. Optimizing hysterectomy: a prospective comparative analysis of surgical techniques and their impact on women’s lives. Journal of personalized medicine. 2024;14(3):265.
Vettoretto N, Foglia E, Gerardi C, Lettieri E, Nocco U, Botteri E, et al. High-energy devices in different surgical settings: lessons learnt from a full health technology assessment report developed by SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica). Surgical endoscopy. 2023;37(4):2548-65.
Shimada E, Matsumoto Y, Endo M, Setsu N, Fujiwara T, Yahiro K, et al. Clinical benefits of vessel sealing system (LigaSure™) during surgery for soft tissue sarcoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Japanese journal of clinical oncology. 2021;51(8):1242-7.
Shrivastava N. To Study the clinical outcomes of Ligasure vessel sealer haemorrhoidectomy in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids: A prospective study.
Adams SS. Comparative study of treatment methods of haemorrhoids: Vilniaus universitetas.; 2023.
Onder T, Altiok M. A retrospective comparative study of hemorrhoidal artery ligation versus ligasure hemorrhoidectomy for the third degree hemorrhoidal disease. Asian Journal of Surgery. 2023;46(10):4385-8.
Radunz S, Salem H, Houben P, Pascher A, Büsing M, Utech M. LigaSure Impact™ reduces complications after abdominoplasty in weight loss patients. Langenbeck's archives of surgery. 2022;407(1):321-6.
Haksal MC, Çiftci A, Tiryaki Ç, Yazıcıoğlu MB, Özyıldız M, Yıldız SY. Comparison of the reliability and efficacy of LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy and a conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the surgical treatment of grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids. Turkish journal of surgery. 2017;33(4):233-6.
Ramouz A, Rasihashemi SZ, Safaeiyan A, Hosseini M. Comparing postoperative complication of LigaSure Small Jaw instrument with clamp and tie method in thyroidectomy patients: a randomized controlled trial [IRCT2014010516077N1]. World journal of surgical oncology. 2018;16(1):154.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rohit Kumar, Mahrukh Shafiq, Aun Ali, Muhammad Mansoor Iqbal, Madeeha Shahid, Yousaf Lakdawala

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.