Diagnostic Accuracy of Echocardiography in Assessment of Ejection Fraction Taking CT-Cardiac Function Analysis as Gold Standard
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i4.1674Keywords:
Ejection fraction, echocardiography, cardio CT, accuracyAbstract
Ejection fraction (EF) is a vital parameter in assessing cardiac function and guiding therapeutic decisions. While echocardiography remains the most commonly used modality due to its non-invasiveness and accessibility, its diagnostic accuracy in EF estimation has been debated. Cardiac computed tomography (CT), although less frequently utilized, offers potential advantages in EF evaluation. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ejection fraction (EF) measurements obtained via echocardiography and to compare these results with those obtained from cardiac CT. Methods: This observational, comparative study was conducted at KRL Hospital, Islamabad, from December 15, 2024, to March 15, 2025. After obtaining ethical approval from the institutional review board, a total of 100 patients aged 20–70 years of both genders, presenting with suspected or known cardiac conditions requiring EF assessment, were recruited through non-probability consecutive sampling. EF was measured for all participants using both transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac CT. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting abnormal EF were calculated using CT findings as the reference standard. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25. Results: Echocardiography demonstrated moderate diagnostic accuracy for EF assessment, with a sensitivity of 55% and specificity of 67%. In contrast, cardiac CT showed superior diagnostic performance, achieving a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 80% in detecting abnormal EF. Conclusion: Echocardiography provides moderate diagnostic accuracy for evaluating ejection fraction, with relatively lower sensitivity and specificity compared to cardiac CT. The findings suggest that cardiac CT may serve as a more reliable modality for EF assessment, particularly in cases where precise evaluation is critical.
Downloads
References
Konstam MA, Abboud FM. Ejection Fraction: Misunderstood and Overrated (Changing the Paradigm in Categorizing Heart Failure). Circulation. 2017;135(8):717-9.
Heidenreich Paul A, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen Larry A, Byun Joni J, Colvin Monica M, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022;79(17):e263-e421.
Mancusi C, Basile C, Spaccarotella C, Gargiulo G, Fucile I, Paolillo S, et al. Novel Strategies in Diagnosing Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Comprehensive Literature Review. High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention. 2024;31(2):127-40.
Sun X, Yin Y, Yang Q, Huo T. Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular diseases: diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives. European Journal of Medical Research. 2023;28(1):242.
Fraser AG, Monaghan MJ, van der Steen AFW, Sutherland GR. A concise history of echocardiography: timeline, pioneers, and landmark publications. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;23(9):1130-43.
Dini FL, Cameli M, Stefanini A, Aboumarie HS, Lisi M, Lindqvist P, et al. Echocardiography in the Assessment of Heart Failure Patients. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14(23).
Tatsugami F, Nakaura T, Yanagawa M, Fujita S, Kamagata K, Ito R, et al. Recent advances in artificial intelligence for cardiac CT: Enhancing diagnosis and prognosis prediction. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2023;104(11):521-8.
Dissabandara T, Lin K, Forwood M, Sun J. Validating real-time three-dimensional echocardiography against cardiac magnetic resonance, for the determination of ventricular mass, volume and ejection fraction: a meta-analysis. Clinical Research in Cardiology. 2024;113(3):367-92.
Conte E, Mushtaq S, Muscogiuri G, Formenti A, Annoni A, Mancini E, et al. The Potential Role of Cardiac CT in the Evaluation of Patients With Known or Suspected Cardiomyopathy: From Traditional Indications to Novel Clinical Applications. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021;8.
Harkness A, Ring L, Augustine DX, Oxborough D, Robinson S, Sharma V. Normal reference intervals for cardiac dimensions and function for use in echocardiographic practice: a guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography. Echo Res Pract. 2020;7(1):G1-g18.
Almaadawy O, Uretsky BF, Krittanawong C, Birnbaum Y. Target Heart Rate Formulas for Exercise Stress Testing: What Is the Evidence? Journal of clinical medicine. 2024;13(18):5562.
Nicol P, Rank A, Lenz T, Schürmann F, Syryca F, Trenkwalder T, et al. Echocardiographic evaluation of left ventricular function using an automated analysis algorithm is feasible for beginners and experts: comparison with invasive and non-invasive methods. J Echocardiogr. 2023;21(2):65-73.
Oktay AA, Shah SJ. Diagnosis and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: 10 key lessons. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2015;11(1):42-52.
Groeneveld NS, Guglielmi V, Leeflang MMG, Matthijs Boekholdt S, Nils Planken R, Roos Y, et al. CT angiography vs echocardiography for detection of cardiac thrombi in ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2020;267(6):1793-801.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bushra Ishtiaq, Muhammad Wasim Awan, Uzma Rashid, Shan E Zahra, Shaghaf Iqbal, Huma Mahmood Mughal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.