Audit of Cesarean Section Rates and Indications in Public Sector Hospitals of Saudi Arabia

Zahra Elbukhari Mohammed Ahmed  Ali; Sanam  Jamali

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v6i4.1664

Authors

Zahra Elbukhari Mohammed Ahmed Ali Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dallah Hospital- Alkhobar KSA, Saudi Arabia
Sanam Jamali Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Dallah Hospital- Alkhobar KSA, Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i4.1664

Keywords:

Cesarean Section, Audit, Obstetrics, Saudi Arabia, Indications

Abstract

The global rise in cesarean section (CS) rates has raised concerns about its appropriateness and potential overuse. Understanding local trends and clinical indications is essential for optimizing obstetric practices. Objective: To audit the rates and clinical indications of cesarean section deliveries in selected public sector hospitals of Saudi Arabia. Methods: This retrospective, multi-center clinical audit was conducted over six months (October 2023 to March 2024) in three major government hospitals: King Saud Medical City (Riyadh), King Fahd Hospital of the University (Al Khobar), and Maternity and Children Hospital (Jeddah). 1,050 CS cases (350 from each hospital) were included using non-probability consecutive sampling. Inclusion criteria were women aged 18–45 who underwent elective or emergency CS during the study period. Data were extracted from medical records, including maternal age, parity, booking status, gestational age, type and indication of CS, comorbidities, and neonatal outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Version 26.0. Associations between CS type and clinical parameters were tested using chi-square, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results: The mean maternal age was 30.8 ± 5.7 years; 58.9% were multiparous. Elective and emergency CS accounted for 44% and 56% of cases, respectively. The most common indications were previous CS (28%), fetal distress (18.9%), and cephalopelvic disproportion (12%). A significant association (p < 0.001) was found between the type of CS and its indication. Emergency CS was linked to lower Apgar scores (p = 0.003) and low birth weight (p = 0.041). No significant institutional difference was observed in CS types across hospitals (p = 0.078). Conclusion: Cesarean section rates in public hospitals of Saudi Arabia exceed WHO recommendations, with prior CS and fetal distress being the leading indications. Institutional practices were consistent, but clinical vigilance is needed to reduce unnecessary CS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM; WHO Working Group on Caesarean Section. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526.

Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29(1):7-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285829.

Huang X, Lei J, Tan H, Walker M, Zhou J, Wen SW. Cesarean delivery for first pregnancy and neonatal morbidity and mortality in second pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod. 2011;158(2):204-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.05.006.

Rafiei M, Saei Ghare M, Akbari M, Kiani F, Sayehmiri F, Sayehmiri K, et al. Prevalence, causes, and complications of cesarean delivery in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2018;16(4):221-34.

Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(4):262.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035.

Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026.

Sung S, Mahdy H. Cesarean Section. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.

De Jager K. Audit of term elective caesarean section outcomes at Tygerberg Academic Hospital. (Online) 2021 (cited 2018 Jun 25). Available from: https://scholar.sun.ac.za/server/api/core/bitstreams/7855854b-9503-4433-b813-ba74bc16227b/content

World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018. (Online) 2018 (cited 2018 Jun 25). Available from: https://www.google.com.pk/books/edition/WHO_Recommendations_on_Intrapartum_Care/hHOyDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover

Shakeri M, Mazloumzade S, Mohamaian F. Factors affecting the rate of cesarean section in Zanjan maternity hospitals in 2008. J Adv Med Biomed Res. 2012;20:98-104.

Lee AS, Kirkman M. Disciplinary discourses: rates of cesarean section explained by medicine, midwifery, and feminism. Health Care Women Int. 2008;29:448-67. doi: 10.1080/07399330801949574.

Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e005671. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671.

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343.

Al-Hammami H, Taleb MJ, Alsharif MN, Taleb MM. Prevalence of cesarean section at ALTAWLID Hospital during the Syrian crisis. J Med Pharm Allied Sci. 2017;6:947-53.

Roberts CL, Algert CS, Ford JB, Todd AL, Morris JM. Pathways to a rising caesarean section rate: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001725. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001725.

Mohammed AK. A cross-sectional analytic study of rate and indication of caesarean section. Res Sq. 2022. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1558056/v1. (Preprint)

Omani-Samani R, Mohammadi M, Almasi-Hashiani A, Maroufizadeh S. Cesarean section and socioeconomic status in Tehran, Iran. J Res Health Sci. 2017;17:e00394.

Ahmed HM, Namir AL. Rate and indications of cesarean section in the Maternity Teaching Hospital in Erbil City, Kurdistan region, Iraq. Zanco J Med Sci. 2018;22:148-54. doi: 10.15218/zjms.2018.020.

AlSheeha MA. Epidemiology of cesarean delivery in Qassim, Saudi Arabia. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6:e891-5. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.213.

Deng R, Tang X, Liu J, Gao Y, Zhong X. Cesarean delivery on maternal request and its influencing factors in Chongqing, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:384. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03866-7.

Shabila NP. Trends and changes in cesarean delivery rates in Iraq: findings from the multiple indicator cluster surveys, 2011-2018. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35:6272-7. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1910664.

Abdulrahman M, Abdullah SS, Alaani AFK, AlAbdool NH, Sherif FEY, Ahmed ZS, et al. Exploring obstetrical interventions and stratified cesarean section rates using the Robson classification in tertiary care hospitals in the United Arab Emirates. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2019;41:147-54. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676524.