Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Diagnosing and Staging Urinary Bladder Carcinoma, Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v6i3.1583Keywords:
MRI, Bladder carcinoma, Histopathology, accuracyAbstract
Urinary bladder carcinoma is a common malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis and staging are essential for guiding treatment decisions. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) provides a non-invasive approach for evaluating bladder tumours; however, its diagnostic accuracy compared to histopathology, the gold standard, requires validation. Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced MRI in diagnosing and staging urinary bladder carcinoma in comparison to histopathological findings. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC), Karachi, from September 1, 2024, to February 28, 2025, following ethical approval. A total of 25 patients aged ≥18 years, of either gender, with clinical suspicion of urinary bladder carcinoma, were enrolled using non-probability consecutive sampling. Patients with contraindications to MRI or a history of contrast allergy were excluded. All patients underwent CE-MRI followed by cystoscopic biopsy for histopathological confirmation. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CE-MRI were calculated by comparing MRI findings with histopathological results. Results: CE-MRI demonstrated a sensitivity of 53.85%, specificity of 75%, and an overall diagnostic accuracy of 64% in detecting and staging urinary bladder carcinoma. Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced MRI shows moderate diagnostic accuracy in the detection and staging of urinary bladder carcinoma. While it provides valuable non-invasive insights, its limited sensitivity underscores the continued importance of histopathology for definitive diagnosis.
Downloads
References
Saginala K, Barsouk A, Aluru JS, Rawla P, Padala SA, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of bladder cancer. Medical sciences. 2020;8(1):15.
van Hoogstraten LM, Vrieling A, van der Heijden AG, Kogevinas M, Richters A, Kiemeney LA. Global Trends in the Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer: Challenges for Public Health and Clinical Practice. Nature reviews Clinical oncology. 2023;20(5):287-304.
Hensley PJ, Panebianco V, Pietzak E, Kutikov A, Vikram R, Galsky MD, et al. Contemporary staging for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: accuracy and limitations. European Urology Oncology. 2022;5(4):403-11.
Tufano A, Rosati D, Moriconi M, Santarelli V, Canale V, Salciccia S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the detection of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis. Current Oncology. 2024;31(2):818-27.
Ahmed SA, Taher MGA, Ali WA, Ebrahem MAES. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the assessment of tumour response to neoadjuvant therapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Abdominal Radiology. 2021;46:2712-21.
Costelloe CM, Amini B, Madewell JE, editors. Risks and benefits of gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced MRI. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI; 2020: Elsevier.
Caglic I, Panebianco V, Vargas HA, Bura V, Woo S, Pecoraro M, et al. MRI of bladder cancer: local and nodal staging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2020;52(3):649-67.
Sim KC, Sung DJ. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in tumour staging and follow-up for bladder cancer. Translational Andrology and Urology. 2020;9(6):2890.
Stabile A, Giganti F, Kasivisvanathan V, Giannarini G, Moore CM, Padhani AR, et al. Factors influencing variability in the performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer: a systematic literature review. European urology oncology. 2020;3(2):145-67.
Panebianco V, Narumi Y, Altun E, Bochner BH, Efstathiou JA, Hafeez S, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for bladder cancer: development of VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System). European urology. 2018;74(3):294-306.
Rais-Bahrami S, Pietryga JA, Nix JW, editors. Contemporary Role of Advanced Imaging in Bladder Cancer Staging. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations; 2016: Elsevier.
Panebianco V, De Berardinis E, Barchetti G, Simone G, Leonardo C, Grompone MD, et al. An evaluation of morphological and functional multi-parametric MRI sequences in classifying non-muscle and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. European radiology. 2017;27:3759-66.
Lahdensuo K. Diagnostic and predictive tools in localised prostate cancer: biopsies, magnetic-resonance imaging, and tissue markers. 2017.
Gandhi N, Krishna S, Booth CM, Breau RH, Flood TA, Morgan SC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for tumour staging of bladder cancer: systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJU international. 2018;122(5):744-53.
Galgano SJ, Porter KK, Burgan C, Rais-Bahrami S. The role of imaging in bladder cancer diagnosis and staging. Diagnostics. 2020;10(9):703.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Piriha Nisar, . Varsha, . Sanjna, Shaista Shoukat, Abdul Samad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.