COMPARISON OF VAC DRESSING AND SOFRA DRESSING IN DIABETIC FOOT WOUND IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL OF SOUTH PUNJAB

G HASSAN; M SABIR; G YASEEN; I ALAM; N FAREED; I ASIM

doi:10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1430

Authors

G HASSAN Department of Surgery, D. G. Khan Medical College Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
M SABIR Nishtar Medical University Multan, Pakistan
G YASEEN Doctors Hospital Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
I ALAM Department of Surgery, D. G. Khan Medical College Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
N FAREED Department of Surgery, D. G. Khan Medical College Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
I ASIM Department of Surgery, D. G. Khan Medical College Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1430

Keywords:

Diabetic foot ulcers, vacuum-assisted closure, Sofra dressing, wound healing, Pakistan, advanced wound care.

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are a significant complication of diabetes, contributing to high morbidity and healthcare costs. Vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy is a promising intervention for DFU management, but its adoption in Pakistan is limited. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of VAC therapy and conventional Sofra dressing in managing DFUs in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A prospective comparative study was conducted among 120 patients with Wagner grade 2 or 3 DFUs. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group A (VAC therapy) and Group B (Sofra dressing). Data on wound surface area reduction, granulation tissue formation, and demographic variables were collected over four weeks. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 26, with a p-value of <0.05 considered significant. Results: VAC therapy demonstrated superior outcomes compared to Sofra dressing. The mean wound surface area reduction was 45% in Group A and 25% in Group B. Granulation tissue formation occurred significantly faster in the VAC group (14.90 ± 9.11 days) compared to the Sofra group (29 ± 5.81 days) (p < 0.05). No significant gender differences were observed, but younger patients (<55 years) experienced slightly faster healing rates in both groups. Conclusion: VAC therapy is more effective than conventional Sofra dressing in reducing wound size and promoting faster granulation tissue formation in diabetic foot ulcers. These findings support the adoption of VAC therapy as a standard intervention for DFU management in Pakistan, despite resource limitations. Policy-level support and training are essential for its widespread implementation..

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th Edition. 2021. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org.

Basit A, Fawwad A, Qureshi H, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, prediabetes, and associated risk factors: Second National Diabetes Survey of Pakistan. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e040276.

Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Murdoch DP, et al. Risk factors for foot infections in individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(3):594-601.

Rehman S, Malik T, Ahmed T. Challenges in diabetic foot ulcer management in Pakistan: A systematic review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2021;71(5):1398-1402.

Apelqvist J, Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, et al. Vacuum-assisted closure therapy for diabetic foot wounds: A systematic review. Lancet. 2020;396(10267):1778-1785.

Khan ZA, Zafar N, Ahmed R. Barriers to adopting advanced wound care techniques in Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(6):1432-1438.

Ahmed S, Khan S. Utilization of advanced wound care technologies in tertiary care hospitals in Pakistan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):456.

Zafar N, Siddiqui M, Ahmed A. Comparative efficacy of wound care techniques for diabetic foot ulcers in resource-constrained settings. Int J Nurs Pract. 2020;26(5):e12875.

Malik S, Rehman A. Efficacy of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in DFU management: A meta-analysis. J Wound Care. 2021;30(4):273-280.

Khan AA, Siddiqui R. Role of advanced wound care techniques in improving outcomes for diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2020;17(5):1245-1252.