IN HOSPITAL OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ST ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION NEEDED TEMPORARY PACEMAKER
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2024i1.1271Keywords:
ST-elevation myocardial infarction, temporary pacemaker, in-hospital outcomes, ventricular tachycardia, arrhythmia, mortality, conduction abnormalitiesAbstract
Patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are at risk for conduction abnormalities and bradyarrhythmias, which may necessitate the use of a temporary pacemaker (TP). While TPs can stabilize patients, in-hospital outcomes, particularly mortality and arrhythmic complications, remain concerns. Understanding these outcomes in STEMI patients requiring TP can provide insights into timely interventions and guide clinical management. Objective: .To evaluate the in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) requiring temporary pacemaker (TP) insertion, examine patient demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory parameters, timing of pacemaker intervention, and associated complications. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 90 patients with confirmed STEMI, treated in the cardiology department of a tertiary care hospital. Patients were eligible if they presented with acute STEMI and required TP due to conduction abnormalities or bradyarrhythmias unresponsive to pharmacological therapy. In-hospital outcomes, including mortality and arrhythmic complications (ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, asystole) were recorded. Results: The mean age was 51.14 ± 6.18 years, with a predominance of males (64.4%). TP was inserted at presentation in 47.8% of patients and on the first post-MI day in 52.2%. In-hospital mortality occurred in 7.8% of cases, while ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and asystole were observed in 27.8%, 5.6%, and 2.2% of patients, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with STEMI requiring TP have substantial in-hospital mortality and a high rate of arrhythmic complications, particularly ventricular tachycardia. The findings underscore the importance of early intervention in cases with high risk of conduction abnormalities, emphasizing the value of TP in managing unstable STEMI cases.
Downloads
References
Reindl M, Eitel I, Reinstadler SJ. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance to improve risk prediction following acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020;9(4):1041.
Watanabe N, Takagi K, Tanaka A, Yoshioka N, Morita Y, Yoshida R, et al. Ten-year mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2021;149:9-15.
Reindl M, Holzknecht M, Tiller C, Lechner I, Schiestl M, Simma F, et al. Impact of infarct location and size on clinical outcome after ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. International Journal of Cardiology. 2020;301:14-20.
Versaci F, Biondi-Zoccai G, Dei Giudici A, Mariano E, Trivisonno A, Sciarretta S, et al. Climate changes and ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary angioplasty. International journal of cardiology. 2019;294:1-5.
Gibson CM, Mehta S, Ceschim MR, Frauenfelder A, Vieira D, Botelho R, et al. Evolution of single-lead ECG for STEMI detection using a deep learning approach. International journal of cardiology. 2022;346:47-52.
Wang P, Wang S, Liu Z, Song L, Xu B, Dou K, et al. Prognostic Value of Temporary Pacemaker Insertion in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Era of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2023;24(6):179.
Yanase T, Sakakura K, Jinnouchi H, Taniguchi Y, Yamamoto K, Tsukui T, et al. Factors associated with temporary pacing insertion in patients with inferior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Plos one. 2021;16(5):e0251124.
Suarez K, Banchs JE. A review of temporary permanent pacemakers and a comparison with conventional temporary pacemakers. The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management. 2019;10(5):3652.
Skowerski T, Kułach A, Kucio M, Majewski M, Maciejewski Ł, Wybraniec M, et al. Temporary transvenous cardiac pacing in cathlab—myocardial infarction versus other causes—differences, complications, and prognosis. Data from a single-center retrospective analysis. Cardiology Journal. 2024.
Javid R, Wassef N, Wheatcroft SB, Tayebjee MH. Coronary Guidewires in Temporary Cardiac Pacing and Assessment of Myocardial Viability: Current Perspectives and Future Directions. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023;12(22):6976.
Zavalichi M, Zavalichi SD, Statescu C, GEORGESCU MCA. Cardiac pacing in acute right ventricular myocardial infarction. The Medical-Surgical Journal. 2020;124(4):565-71.
Zeijlon R, Jha S, Le V, Chamat J, Espinosa AS, Poller A, et al. Temporal electrocardiographic changes in anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction versus the Takotsubo syndrome. IJC Heart & Vasculature. 2023;45:101187.
Khalil M, Khawaja AZ, Saidullah S, Rauf A, Younas N, Shah SNA. In Hospital Outcome of Patients with Acute St-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Requiring Temporary Pacemaker. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2023;17(05):336-.
Aamir J, Abdul Rehman A, Faizul Hasan R, Ijaz A. In hospital outcome of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction requiring temporary transvenous pacing. 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 W YOUSAF, S ASIF, SA MALIK, RAK KHARL, A KHURSHID, J ASHRAF
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.